Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Psychology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-30-2009   #11 (permalink)
Jethro Tull's Avatar
Thinking


 
Jethro Tull is infamous around these partsJethro Tull is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: A funny question please leave your opinion ^.^

This is funny, because I just saw some kids across the street doing this today and writhing in amusement and joy.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009   #12 (permalink)
Michaelangelica's Avatar
Creating

Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
North of Sydney Australia
 
Michaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Smile Re: A funny question please leave your opinion ^.^

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexander View Post

By the way i think the psychology behind us liking that is not dissimilar to that behind liking fireworks, rockets and other projectiles. We are generally fascinated by things that defy gravity or logic, we are fascinated with things we can not explain, our minds are tuned to detect motion, and because of that, moving things tend to fascinate us more then not moving things, things that make subtle sound arouse our predatory instinct, which gets further reinforced with the movement of an object, (this is not the case with fireworks and rockets, but is with coke). And exploding things, such as the volatile reaction that makes a bottle of diet coke spew a fountain of soda into the air, also give us a small sense of danger, all of which induces the release of endorphins and adrenalin, both of which, unless in a dangerous situation, we tend to enjoy...
Interesting--and possibly true-- speculations.
Some research on Why might be good.
  • We are generally fascinated by things that defy gravity or logic
  • we are fascinated with things we can not explain,
  • our minds are tuned to detect motion, (Men--the hunter-- only??)
  • things that make subtle sound arouse our predatory instinct,
  • And exploding things, also give us a small sense of danger
  • all of which induces the release of endorphins and adrenalin, both of which, unless in a dangerous situation, we tend to enjoy.


----------------
"Unemployment is capitalism's way of getting you to plant a garden."
~Orson Scott Card
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2009   #13 (permalink)
alexander's Avatar
Dedicated Smart-ass

Senior Moderator
Gallery Curator
Dev Team Member

Location:
Just before 0xAA55
 
alexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond reputealexander has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to alexander
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: A funny question please leave your opinion ^.^

Michael, the detection of motion is not a male or female trait, its in our nature. Back in time, in hunter-gatherer society, detecting motion was both predatory, when men hunted, and defensive, women could be attacked by animals just as easily as men, thus the mind tuned to detect moving things and focus on them. Another reason why, is because our eyes also help us balance, we see and smell and hear in 3d, our eyes constantly adjust to range things, which helps the body ballance. This is the reason why astronauts, while their inner ear might not work, use eyes much more when they get back on earth. It is shown that if you present them with a horizon that moves, the body does not know how to balance at all and completely fails at that task, while if they look out on a stable horizon, they may still have problems walking, but its much easier for them to stay up.

Actually this motion detection and ranging is such an intrinsic part of our vision and perception system, that a significant amount of brain power is set aside for that very process. In an experiment, in which scientists were tracking brain activity, if a subject is asked to focus on the words that appear on an empty screen, you could see visionary response, once a word is shown, you see how the brain processes the information and track that to vocalizing, in a pretty clear pattern. If you add random moving pixels to that screen, you can see constant activity of the brain, regardless of whether the human is trying or not trying to pay attention, the brain is constantly interpreting those moving pixels subconsciously. This makes it a lot harder to concentrate on the words, too...


----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.

Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.

Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.

Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009   #14 (permalink)
Michaelangelica's Avatar
Creating

Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
North of Sydney Australia
 
Michaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Smile Re: A funny question please leave your opinion ^.^

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexander View Post
Michael, the detection of motion is not a male or female trait,
OK I conceded. Please don't make me play or watch football.

It does not explain the preponderance of males in aggressive ball game.


----------------
"Unemployment is capitalism's way of getting you to plant a garden."
~Orson Scott Card
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Funny orbsycli Watercooler 1 06-11-2007 04:54 AM
Anti-Adhesive Layers Leave No Hope for Insects C1ay Science News 0 01-18-2006 04:47 AM
Why should we leave Earth anyway NORMANBOND007 Earth science 16 08-03-2005 06:14 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network