Quantum Mechanics problem

		Science Forums > Help and Advice > Questions and Answers
Quantum Mechanics problem

Page 1 of 3

LinkBack

Question Tools

Published by dkv 08-12-2008

Not Ranked : 0 score

Since I have my own opinions therefore I thought it would be better to post the thread here.I have a question. In Quantum Mechanics there is something called probability density which is a solution of Schrödinger equation.
For particle in a Box the solutions are very simple ,phi=sqrt(2/L)*sin(kx)
momentum p=nh/2L , energy =n^2*h^2/8mL^2
The initial conditions are given as at x=0, phi=0 and at x=L, phi=0
Particle in a box - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

However if I change the phi and initial conditions then will there be any change in the observables i.e the energy and momentum ?

For example if I let phi=Asin(kx)+B where B is a constant.
Initial conditions are given as x=0 phi=B and at x=L phi=B
i.e the probability densities are not exactly zero at x=0,L

Thanks

#1 (permalink)

By dkv on 08-12-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

I do not find any change in the Energy and momentum at all. Moreover there are infinite wave function solutions with different initial conditions which satisfy the Schrodinger's equation and give the same energy and momentum..
The wave function remains normalizable.
Thus there is no definite shape of the probability distribution of particle in the box.

Energy and Momentum remain discreet.

#2 (permalink)

By Erasmus00 on 08-12-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkv

However if I change the phi and initial conditions then will there be any change in the observables i.e the energy and momentum ?

For example if I let phi=Asin(kx)+B where B is a constant.
Initial conditions are given as x=0 phi=B and at x=L phi=B
i.e the probability densities are not exactly zero at x=0,L

The probability needs to be 0 at x=0 and L or else your wave function isn't continuous (or fails to meet the boundary condition of 0 at infinity). You aren't free to add a constant (it solves the problem but not physical boundary conditions).
-Will

#3 (permalink)

By dkv on 08-12-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

Hello Will,
The wave function remains continuous within the range.
My question is why do we need probability to be zero at x=0 when it is possible to find the particle at x=0?
For a large particle it is understandable but for small atomic ones this need not be the case because boudary is largely empty ..(more 90% empty)

Moreover uncertainity principle demands that we can not know the position of a particle and its momentum with any certainity more than h/2pi.
At x=0 we know that particle does not exist(i.e momentum is zero because mass is zero).

It is possible to have a finite probability at x=0 without changing the energy and momentum of the particle within the box.

#4 (permalink)

By dkv on 08-13-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

Infact the Energy and Momentum remains unchanged in the Hydrogen Atom even if we change the probability density function by a constant...
Which means that there is no unique solution to the probability density.

#5 (permalink)

By Jay-qu on 08-13-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

Im not sure where you are throwing this constant in, but you should note that the wavefunction remains unchanged when it undergoes rotation of phase. This invariance to a rotation done in U(1) provides the starting point from which QED can be derived.

#6 (permalink)

By dkv on 08-13-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

In the integration of the wave function we can introduce the constant.I am not talking about the phase rotation.. I am talking about non-zero probabilities.
Meaning that the probabilities always remains greater than 0 at any point within the defintion of the problem.
The non-zero probabilities at the boundary conditions do not change the Energy or Momentum distribution inside the box or inside an atom.
For simplicity can you find any mistake in the box argument? No.
Solving for the particle in the box there are infinite number of wave function solutions ,with different non-zero initial conditions, giving the same discreet Energy and Momentum.

#7 (permalink)

By Erasmus00 on 08-13-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkv

Hello Will,
The wave function remains continuous within the range.

It needs to be continuous over ALL space. Outside of the box (if its an infinite well) the wavefunction must be 0 to solve Schroedinger. Therefore to be continuous at the boundary it must be 0.

Quote:

Moreover uncertainity principle demands that we can not know the position of a particle and its momentum with any certainity more than h/2pi.
At x=0 we know that particle does not exist(i.e momentum is zero because mass is zero).

You cannot apply the uncertainty principle to a single point in space- its about distributions. Uncertainty is defined with standard deviation of a distribution and its mean.

Quote:

It is possible to have a finite probability at x=0 without changing the energy and momentum of the particle within the box.

Which is fine, but it doesn't solve the Schroedinger equation with a continuous result.
-Will

#8 (permalink)

By Erasmus00 on 08-13-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkv

Your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise. A family of solutions can all have the same energy and momentum, which are differential operators. However, only one of the family satisfies the boundary conditions. You aren't free to set your boundary conditions haphazardly, they fall out from the requirement that schroedinger's equation must be satisfied in the wall of the box AND the wavefunction must be continuous.
-Will

#9 (permalink)

By dkv on 08-14-2008

Re: Quantum Mechanics problem

Wave functions are only continous within the range.. It is not possible to create arbitarily continuos equations because potentials can change sharply. The known function of the particle in the Box is continuous within the range of conditions.

Changing the intial conditions doesnt make the function discontinuous. Can you give me an example where the equation becomes discontinuous ??
psi= A sin(kx) + b remains continuous at all points inside the box. (not outside the box because function is not defined outside the infinite potential)
You can still perform the differentiation and integration on the modified equation.

What I said was nothing new.. Probability is never zero in the physical situations.
That is why a family of solutions can exist.
In the GR theory the solutions of einstein equations left the scope for a constant which Einstein incorporated initially but later called it the greatest mistake of his life.But today scientists are finding that such a constant can account for the virtual energy filled in the vacuum of the space.
Similarly by incorporating the missing constant in the wave function(no matter how small) we can predict the probabilistic interaction of particles at the boundary..
What happens when there is a minimum probability of at the boundaries? What happens if particles occasionaly interacts with the boundary?
For example if particle is photon then at the boundary what happens? Will it escape out of the box ? Will it get absorbed by the atoms on the boundary?
In my opinion if the boundary accepts the photon energy then sooner or later it will get absorbed and will leave the system.
These are some of interesting questions which arises due to this slight modification.

Page 1 of 3

Bookmarks

Your Ad Here

Currently Active Users Viewing This Question: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Question Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page

Similar Threads
Question	Question Starter	Category	Comments	Last Post
Postulates on the behavior in quantum mechanics.	arkain101	Philosophy of Science	4	04-05-2007 09:34 AM
Quantum mechanics versus Einstein	humanbydefault	Physics and Mathematics	2	03-13-2006 10:48 AM
Quantum Mechanics & Celestial Mechanics	Abstruce	Physics and Mathematics	11	01-26-2006 06:57 PM
Against the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics	Daymare17	Physics and Mathematics	1	11-08-2005 07:54 PM
Is Quantum Mechanics Just a Math Trick?	Fishteacher73	Physics and Mathematics	15	01-24-2005 02:44 PM

» Advertisement

» Recent Threads
Why is the Universe the way it is?
Japan
Boerseun's Perpetual Motion Machine...
Expanding Universe
Off-grid power sources
Quotes
Could aliens be time-travelling humans from the future?
Katabatak Math-An Exploration In Pure Number Theory
Does a genome have entropy
What are you listening to right now?

» Latest Science News
Spitzer Observes a Chaotic Planetary System by C1ay
Generating electricity from air flow by Tormod
First Aquarium in US to Breed Dwarf Cuttlefish by Moontanman
Cognitive Dysfunction Reversed in Mouse Model of Down Syndrome by Moontanman
Paleontologists Find Extinction Rates Higher in Open-Ocean Settings During Mass Extin by Moontanman

» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
Robert Pattinson - 0%
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
Total Votes: 11 You may not vote on this poll.
» View Poll Results » Comment On This Poll » This Poll Has 13 Comments

Hypography?

Share the love!

Sponsors

Friends