Go Back   Science Forums > Help and Advice > Questions and Answers
Comment
 
LinkBack Question Tools
Old 05-10-2009  
paigetheoracle's Avatar
paigetheoracle
Thinking


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Placebo - mind over matter?

Could placebo effectiveness be proof of mind over...


----------------
Author of 'Empty Thoughts from an Empty Head' and other trivia including 'Logic Lists English, the cure for illiteracy (allegedly)'.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
By paigetheoracle on 06-03-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

The way I view placebo is the same way I see 'lucky charms' - belief driven. It works by drawing attention to what is wrong and believing it can be fixed as opposed to abandonment and depression, which is believing nothing works, so staying ill or getting worse.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
By stereologist on 06-03-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

Quote:
Could placebo effectiveness be proof of mind over...
I guess it all depends on what you mean. My interpretation is no. Here are some ideas to consider:

1. The placebo effect also works with real treatments
2. Placebo effects are not strong clinical effects
3. Pill color and type make a difference
4. People receiving pain killers and thought they were getting a placebo reported less benefit
5. Placebos don't work on people that are asleep
6. Placebos usually affect only subjective issues such as pain, headaches, nausea, and so forth
7. Placebos usually do not affect objective issues - things that can be measured (poor evidence for this)
8. People told that a side effect of a drug was nausea suffered adverse effects to the inert material
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
By paigetheoracle on 06-04-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stereologist View Post
I guess it all depends on what you mean. My interpretation is no. Here are some ideas to consider:

1. The placebo effect also works with real treatments
2. Placebo effects are not strong clinical effects
3. Pill color and type make a difference
4. People receiving pain killers and thought they were getting a placebo reported less benefit
5. Placebos don't work on people that are asleep
6. Placebos usually affect only subjective issues such as pain, headaches, nausea, and so forth
7. Placebos usually do not affect objective issues - things that can be measured (poor evidence for this)
8. People told that a side effect of a drug was nausea suffered adverse effects to the inert material
All the above seem to suggest mind over matter to me, including pill colour and sleep (If you're asleep, how can you suggest/ hypnotize somebody into believing that they are getting better or worse as the above suggests). It won't remove a tumour but if you read 'Anatomy of an Illness' by Norman Cousins, you might see that the power of positive suggestion does work but over time, not instantly as with a scalpel.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
By stereologist on 06-04-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

I see all of the above reasons for showing there is no 'mind over matter'.

For example, you still have a mind if asleep, yet no effect is observed.

An interesting attitude is that some people get 'hooked' on the placebos. They demand that the doctor continue to give them the placebo even after being told that it is an inert material. Doctors admit prescribing placebos, for example prescribing antibiotics for viral infections.

Like I suggested before, it all depends on what 'mind over matter' is defined to be.

Do you have a definition?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
By paigetheoracle on 06-05-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stereologist View Post
I see all of the above reasons for showing there is no 'mind over matter'.

For example, you still have a mind if asleep, yet no effect is observed.

An interesting attitude is that some people get 'hooked' on the placebos. They demand that the doctor continue to give them the placebo even after being told that it is an inert material. Doctors admit prescribing placebos, for example prescribing antibiotics for viral infections.

Like I suggested before, it all depends on what 'mind over matter' is defined to be.

Do you have a definition?
That which believes it can control matter and therefore can - you in other words: As somebody said 'If you believe you can do something, you can (include curing yourself - it's called motivation) - if you believe you can't, you won't' (Henry Ford?). If you move it is your will power that achieves this otherwise it couldn't happen: There has to be a you that wants to achieve things for them to happen, it doesn't happen spontaneously for no reason or don't you believe in cause and effect?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
By stereologist on 06-05-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

I don't believe we can control matter by thinking. Numerous studies have shown that thinking about a cure does not cure. Cancer is not cured by thinking a cure. Thinking, prayer, motivation, or what ever you want to call it did not stop AIDS.

Diseases can be stopped in comatose patients. Although the placebo effect is not seen in sleeping or unaware patients drugs do work.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
By paigetheoracle on 06-05-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stereologist View Post
I don't believe we can control matter by thinking. Numerous studies have shown that thinking about a cure does not cure. Cancer is not cured by thinking a cure. Thinking, prayer, motivation, or what ever you want to call it did not stop AIDS.

Diseases can be stopped in comatose patients. Although the placebo effect is not seen in sleeping or unaware patients drugs do work.
What you're saying is that drugs and operations cure diseases? I use drugs to 'control' my migraines but it doesn't cure the dis-ease and it was emotion (anger) that started them. You can control pests in the garden and put down fertilizer to encourage growth. You can also harvest what you've planted but you still need the roots of the good plants to survive and to kill the weeds to optimize the crop. If the root of a dis-ease is mental and not physical, killing the effect upon the body through drugs or cutting out the offending parts through surgery, won't cure the patient - hence remission, not to mention iatrogenic damage through surgical procedures and drug reactions/ overdoses.

What percentage of patients die under medical supervision as opposed to survive cancer without it and why do people in China survive cancer where people in the West die in their droves from it? These are questions that need answering. Why the spread of Aids and why are some people surviving it nowadays? Why doesn't every accident or illness kill every victim alike? Why do some survive while others succumb? These are questions you should ask yourself and indeed this is the whole point of this thread. Not to blandly accept that we know the answers to everything but to search for them diligently and that means both you and me as well as everyone else interested in this thread. The world needs to progress or die out like the dinosaurs, through lack of evolution of thought, leading to evolution of body i.e. every research, leading to every advance in our knowledge and abilities to act therefore to our individual or racial advantage.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
By Michaelangelica on 06-05-2009
Smile Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stereologist View Post
I don't believe we can control matter by thinking. Numerous studies have shown that thinking about a cure does not cure. Cancer is not cured by thinking a cure. Thinking, prayer, motivation, or what ever you want to call it did not stop AIDS.

Diseases can be stopped in comatose patients. Although the placebo effect is not seen in sleeping or unaware patients drugs do work.
i don't believe this to be true.
See my previous posts.

What evidence have you that sleeping or comatose patients are not affected by placebos?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
By stereologist on 06-05-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

Quote:
i don't believe this to be true.
See my previous posts.
Can you clarify this?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
By stereologist on 06-05-2009
Re: Placebo - mind over matter?

Quote:
What you're saying is that drugs and operations cure diseases?
Yes. In some cases. You point to a disease in which the treatment is not a cure.

Quote:
What percentage of patients die under medical supervision as opposed to survive cancer without it and why do people in China survive cancer where people in the West die in their droves from it? These are questions that need answering. Why the spread of Aids and why are some people surviving it nowadays? Why doesn't every accident or illness kill every victim alike? Why do some survive while others succumb? These are questions you should ask yourself and indeed this is the whole point of this thread. Not to blandly accept that we know the answers to everything but to search for them diligently and that means both you and me as well as everyone else interested in this thread. The world needs to progress or die out like the dinosaurs, through lack of evolution of thought, leading to evolution of body i.e. every research, leading to every advance in our knowledge and abilities to act therefore to our individual or racial advantage.
There are a lot issues here.
My main question is, do you have any evidence of the cancer in China statement?
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Question: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Question Tools


Similar Threads
Question Question Starter Category Comments Last Post
Stigmata & possession - proof of mind over matter? paigetheoracle Strange Claims Forum 12 05-01-2009 08:37 AM
Placebo quandry paigetheoracle Medical Science 0 03-16-2009 02:35 PM
Placebo matrixscarface Medical Science 12 01-06-2008 09:44 PM
Mind over Matter theblackalchemist Science News Elsewhere 0 06-22-2007 08:26 PM
Placebo Effect: Explain This! McGyver Medical Science 7 07-01-2005 02:13 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:45 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008