Go Back   Science Forums > Science News, Articles, Papers > Science News
Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools
Published by Tormod 08-04-2005
Marvin Cohen, president of the American Physical Society (APS), has stated that that only scientifically validated theories, such as evolution, should be taught in the nation’s science classes.

He made this statement in response to recently reported remarks of President Bush about intelligent design, which is a type of creationism.

"We are happy that the President's recent comments on the theory of intelligent design have been clarified,” says Cohen. “As Presidential Science Advisor John Marburger has explained, President Bush does not regard intelligent design as science. If such things are to be taught in the public schools, we believe they belong in a course on comparative religion, which is a particularly appropriate subject for our children given the present state of the world."

In comments to journalists in Texas on Monday, President Bush said that intelligent design should be taught side by side with scientific theories of evolution in the classroom.

Presidential science advisor John Marburger followed up on the President’s comments in an interview on Tuesday, stating that “evolution is the cornerstone of modern biology” and ''intelligent design is not a scientific concept.'' Marburger also said it would be over-interpreting President Bush’s remarks to conclude that Bush meant that intelligent design should be placed on an equal footing with evolution.

The APS governing Council has long expressed its opposition to the inclusion of religious concepts such as intelligent design and related forms of creationism in science classes. Two statements, passed by the Council in 1981 and 1999, can be found on the web at http://www.aps.org/statements/81_1.cfm and http://www.aps.org/statements/99_5.cfm respectively.

The American Physical Society is the world’s largest professional body of physicists, representing over 43,000 physicists in academia and industry in the US and internationally. Its President, Marvin L. Cohen, is University Professor of Physics at the University of California, Berkeley. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, and received the National Medal of Science from President Bush in 2002.

Source: American Physical Society
  #1 (permalink)  
By Fishteacher73 on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

This is very similar to the POV of the NAS.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
By Southtown on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

Any hypotheses attempting to venture before the big bang, into how or why space, matter, and energy came to be, will be unrepeatable and unobservable, and therefore unscientific, treading in the realm of religion.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
By C1ay on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southtown
Any hypotheses attempting to venture before the big bang, into how or why space, matter, and energy came to be, will be unrepeatable and unobservable, and therefore unscientific, treading in the realm of religion.
Unrepeatable and unobservable, and unscientific does not necessarily mean religous, just unscientific. Anyone's faith that such a hypothesis is true would be religous.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
By Southtown on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by C1ay
Unrepeatable and unobservable, and unscientific does not necessarily mean religous, just unscientific. Anyone's faith that such a hypothesis is true would be religous.
What is the purpose of a hypothesis if not to be held as true?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
By C1ay on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southtown
What is the purpose of a hypothesis if not to be held as true?
hy·poth·e·sis

1. A tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation.
2. Something taken to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation; an assumption.
3. The antecedent of a conditional statement.

It can be assumed true for the sake of argument, that does not mean that it is true. Anyone who thinks that it is, does so by faith.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
By Dark Mind on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

Then I DO have faith . Huh, go figure...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
By MortenS on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southtown
What is the purpose of a hypothesis if not to be held as true?
The purpose of a hypothesis is to generate testable predictions. If the hypothesis can not generate testable predictions, it is not a good hypothesis.

When you test a hypothesis it can either fail, or it can pass the test.

If it fails the test(s), you either have to modify the hypothesis (most often) or scrap it completely.

If it pass the test, you device new tests that can falsify the hypothesis.

and so on...

Whether a hypothesis is good or bad does not depend on whether it is true or false, it depends on whether it is testable or not.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
By Southtown on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by C1ay
hy·poth·e·sis

1. A tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation.
2. Something taken to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation; an assumption.
3. The antecedent of a conditional statement.

It can be assumed true for the sake of argument, that does not mean that it is true. Anyone who thinks that it is, does so by faith.
And hypotheses delving into the realm of "first cause" are naturally doomed to remain hypotheses, correct?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
By bumab on 08-04-2005
Re: Intelligent Design Should Not be Taught as Science

In fact, hypothesis are formally meant to be disproven, not proven.
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools


Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
Science Cannot Replace Religion Antti Theology forum 50 06-14-2006 12:22 PM
Intelligent Design Uncle Martin Philosophy Forums 14 03-05-2005 12:26 AM
Intelligent design / creationism Stargazer Biology 206 02-25-2005 10:42 AM
Toward an Intelligent Design Science James Putnam Philosophy of Science 110 02-19-2005 02:14 AM
Preliminary remarks on the philosophy of science The Heretic Philosophy of Science 9 02-16-2005 11:16 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008