Go Back   Science Forums > Science News, Articles, Papers > Science News
Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools
Published by C1ay 11-04-2005
In the sci-fi movie "The Matrix," a cable running from a computer into Neo's brain writes in visual perceptions, and Neo's brain can manipulate the computer-created world. In reality, scientists cannot interact directly with the brain because they do not understand enough about how it codes and decodes information.

Now, neuroscientists in the McGovern Institute at MIT have been able to decipher a part of the code involved in recognizing visual objects. Practically speaking, computer algorithms used in artificial vision systems might benefit from mimicking these newly uncovered codes.

The study, a collaboration between James DiCarlo's and Tomaso Poggio's labs, appears in the Nov. 4 issue of Science.

"We want to know how the brain works to create intelligence," said Poggio, the Eugene McDermott Professor in Brain Sciences and Human Behavior. "Our ability to recognize objects in the visual world is among the most complex problems the brain must solve. Computationally, it is much harder than reasoning." Yet we take it for granted because it appears to happen automatically and almost unconsciously.

"This work enhances our understanding of how the brain encodes visual information in a useful format for brain regions involved in action, planning and memory," said DiCarlo, an assistant professor of neuroscience.

In a fraction of a second, visual input about an object runs from the retina through increasingly higher levels of the visual stream, continuously reformatting the information until it reaches the highest purely visual level, the inferotemporal (IT) cortex. The IT cortex identifies and categorizes the object and sends that information to other brain regions.

To explore how the IT cortex formats that output, the researchers trained monkeys to recognize different objects grouped into categories, such as faces, toys and vehicles. The images appeared in different sizes and positions in the visual field. Recording the activity of hundreds of IT neurons produced a large database of IT neural patterns generated in response to each object under many different conditions.

Then, the researchers used a computer algorithm, called a classifier, to decipher the code. The classifier was used to associate each object -- say, a monkey's face -- with a particular pattern of neural signals, effectively decoding neural activity. Remarkably, the classifier found that just a split second's worth of the neural signal contained specific enough information to identity and categorize the object, even at positions and sizes the classifier had not previously "seen."

It was quite surprising that so few IT neurons (several hundred out of millions) for such a short period of time contained so much precise information. "If we could record a larger population of neurons simultaneously, we might find even more robust codes hidden in the neural patterns and extract even fuller information," Poggio said.

This work was funded by DARPA, the Office of Naval Research and the National Institutes of Health.

Source: MIT
  #1 (permalink)  
By Bio-Hazard on 11-05-2005
Talking Re: Neuroscientists break code on sight

Yes! Yes! Yes!

What I've been meaning to research lately was the idea that we percieve objects yet our mind can break them down to shapes, colors, items.. lines.. circles.. squares.. and this is a very interesting article. This is mainly what I'm trying to do in science right now, which I do more neuroscience talk at scienceforums.net (me bio-hazard ) I'm going to have to enhance my skills to get a better grasp on this, but I'm glad they actually figured some of it. A lot of this could be arm-chair thought up but when they jot it down and get proof i'm a lot more satisfied.
Last edited by Bio-Hazard; 11-05-2005 at 07:31 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
By Tormod on 11-07-2005
Re: Neuroscientists break code on sight

Great story. Fascinating stuff, really.
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools


Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
Scientists crack 40-year-old DNA puzzle C1ay Science News 3 11-08-2005 05:07 PM
Prophecized Biblical Events Have Occurred Eddy_P Theology forum 7 10-11-2005 10:56 PM
SCO vs IBM results alexander Computer Science and Technology 2 07-14-2005 09:47 PM
Basic: Programming Language or Corrupting Influence Buffy Computer Science and Technology 33 05-06-2005 04:37 AM
Page Table Question Leo_E_49 Computer Science and Technology 14 04-16-2005 10:39 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008