Go Back   Science Forums > Science News, Articles, Papers > Science News
Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools
Published by Tormod 09-20-2006
Satellite images acquired from 23 to 25 August 2006 have shown for the first time dramatic openings - over a geographic extent larger than the size of the British Isles - in the Arctic's perennial sea ice pack north of Svalbard, and extending into the Russian Arctic all the way to the North Pole.

Observing data from Envisat's Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) instrument and the AMSR-E instrument aboard the EOS Aqua satellite, scientists were able to determine that around 5-10 percent of the Arctic's perennial sea ice, which had survived the summer melt season, has been fragmented by late summer storms. The area between Spitzbergen, the North Pole and Severnaya Zemlya is confirmed by AMSR-E to have had much lower ice concentrations than witnessed during earlier years.

Mark Drinkwater of ESA's Oceans/Ice Unit said: "This situation is unlike anything observed in previous record low ice seasons. It is highly imaginable that a ship could have passed from Spitzbergen or Northern Siberia through what is normally pack ice to reach the North Pole without difficulty.

"If this anomaly trend continues, the North-East Passage or 'Northern Sea Route' between Europe and Asia will be open over longer intervals of time, and it is conceivable we might see attempts at sailing around the world directly across the summer Arctic Ocean within the next 10-20 years."

During the last 25 years, satellites have been observing the Arctic and have witnessed reductions in the minimum ice extent - the lowest amount of ice recorded in the area annually – at the end of summer from around 8 million km2 in the early 1980s to the historic minimum of less than 5.5 million km2 in 2005, changes widely viewed as a consequence of greenhouse warming.

Satellite observations in the past couple of years have also shown that the extent of perennial ice is rapidly declining, but this strange condition in late August marks the first time the perennial ice pack appears to exhibit thinner and more mobile conditions in the European sector of the Central Arctic than in earlier years.

Both sets of images were taken by two different satellite instruments - ASAR on the left and AMSR-E on the right. In the coloured AMSR-E images, ice cover, or the concentration of ice, is represented by the colour. Pink represents pack ice and the colour blue open water. Intermediate colours orange, yellow, and green indicate lower ice concentrations of 70%, 50% and 30%, respectively. In the ASAR images, ice cover is represented by the uniform grey area which extends radially-outwards from the North Pole, represented by the central black hole.

The set of images on the top were both acquired on 24 August 2005, while the bottom left ASAR image was acquired on 23 August 2006 and the AMSR-E on 24 August 2006. In 2005, the uniform grey area in the ASAR image and the pink colour in the AMSR-E image are both consistent all the way around the pole (black hole), indicating pack ice with 100% ice concentration.

However in 2006 there is a significant extent of leads - fractures and openings in the sea-ice cover - just below the pole in both the ASAR image, seen as splashes of dark grey and black, and the AMSR-E image (with British Isles shown for scale), seen by the high concentration of yellow, orange and green colours, signifying low ice concentrations.

In the last weeks, what was open water has begun to freeze, as the autumn air temperatures over the Arctic begin to fall. Although a considerable fraction of darker leads can still be seen in the area using ASAR, the AMSR-E sensor no longer shows openings.

ASAR is an active microwave instrument which sends periodic radar pulses toward the Earth and measures the signals return. AMSR-E is a passive microwave instrument which does not send radar pulses down but receives radiation naturally emitted from the Earth. Passive microwave data contain a certain amount of ambiguity in interpretation of ice types, particularly in mid summer during melting. However, this ambiguity is removed in high resolution active microwave data.

Though the reason for the considerable change in the ice pack configuration is still unknown, it is likely due to the stormy weather conditions in August that characterised the month.

The effect stormy conditions have on ice is illustrated in this ASAR image, taken on 25 August 2006, as the ice in the red circle is divergent as a consequence of a low pressure system centred on the North Pole.

"As autumn freeze-up begins, the current pattern will undoubtedly precondition the ice situation in the Central Arctic for the subsequent ice season," Drinkwater said.

Source: European Space Agency
  #1 (permalink)  
By ronthepon on 09-20-2006
Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

I'm not optimistic about this.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
By Zythryn on 09-20-2006
Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

You know, times like this I really wonder why we aren't doing more.
Even if, as some skeptics state, mankind isn't contributing to GW (which I don't believe for a second) don't the skeptics think we should do something?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
By Tormod on 09-20-2006
Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

Global warming is a fact, and humans are most likely contributing to it. What's not established is whether the observed changes in climate has anything to do with human activities.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
By Turtle on 09-20-2006
Arrow Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tormod
Global warming is a fact, and humans are most likely contributing to it. What's not established is whether the observed changes in climate has anything to do with human activities.
A new study (from Norway no less) appears to indict we humans:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science...eut/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
By Jay-qu on 09-20-2006
Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

I am inclined to think that we do have something to do with it, but isnt it also a natural process? after it warms we cycle back to an ice age.. the planet has been around for billions of years, and will be around for billions more, are we too modest to think we dont have such an impact on this planet?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
By Tormod on 09-20-2006
Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

Well, I didn't imply that humans have not contributed. I simply pointed out that AFAIK there are no direct evidence that humans have caused the trend in global warming.

I don't doubt for a second that a couple of hundred years of pumping exhaust into the atmosphere and toxins into rivers have made lasting damage on our environment. We do have direct evidence that CFC gases break down ozone in the higher layers of the atmosphere, but it does not follow that this means that CFC contributes to global warming.

Global warming as a phenomenon has happened before and will happen again.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
By Boerseun on 09-20-2006
Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

We inhabit such a thin slice of the planet, from sea level to only a few thousand feet up (and a handful a couple of hundred miles up, but that's artificial an' don't count!). But the planet is wholly indifferent to our antics on the surface, we might kill off a couple o' species and then exit stage left ourselves.

My fear is that seeing that most of human concentrations are in coastal cities, can civilization survive tens to hundreds of New Orleans/Katrina events annually?

The info on the ice as mentioned in this article is quite scary - but you can only ask yourself; so where did the ice go?

1) Evaporated, which means that there's more water vapour in the atmosphere, water vapour being a greenhouse gas as well. This will heat up the planet further, and melt more ice, which will inject more water vapour, etc. This water vapour will eventually rain out, raising sea levels.

2) Melted, simply raising sea levels.

In both cases, sea levels will rise, raising the probability of Katrina-like flooding all over the planet.

And if it is indeed a natural phenomena, so be it. But we shouldn't be shortsighted and accelerate it. That's just plain stupid on a global scale.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
By Turtle on 09-20-2006
Arrow Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boerseun
1) Evaporated, which means that there's more water vapour in the atmosphere, water vapour being a greenhouse gas as well. This will heat up the planet further, and melt more ice, which will inject more water vapour, etc. This water vapour will eventually rain out, raising sea levels.

2) Melted, simply raising sea levels.

In both cases, sea levels will rise, raising the probability of Katrina-like flooding all over the planet.

And if it is indeed a natural phenomena, so be it. But we shouldn't be shortsighted and accelerate it. That's just plain stupid on a global scale.
Melting ocean ice in the Arctic will not raise sea levels because the weight of the ice displaces the same weight of water. Like melting ice cubes in a glass of water don't raise the level.
If the extra moisture in the atmosphere precipitates as snow, it may simply grow glaciers and not raise the sea level either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tormod
Well, I didn't imply that humans have not contributed. I simply pointed out that AFAIK there are no direct evidence that humans have caused the trend in global warming....
Global warming as a phenomenon has happened before and will happen again.
Agreed. Moreover, ice ages separate these global warming events/periods. As we have seen here at Hypog over the last many months, every new scientific study adds data that compounds the complexity of this very sticky wicket.
Last edited by Turtle; 09-21-2006 at 01:11 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
By Boerseun on 09-21-2006
Re: Arctic summer ice anomaly shocks scientists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle
Melting ocean ice in the Arctic will not raise sea levels because the weight of the ice displaces the same weight of water. Like melting ice cubes in a glass don't raise the level.
True. Didn't think about that. But if that is happening at the North Pole where the ice sheet is floating (which won't raise sea levels as per your ice-cube analogy), the same can be inferred to be happening with the Greenland ice-sheet, which isn't floating. That'll be a doozy. And with that being said, the Antarctic ice cap have also been shrinking. And that sucker ain't floating either (well, the biggest part of it ain't floating).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle
If the extra moisture in the atmosphere precipitates as snow, it may simply grow glaciers and not raise the sea level either.
Granted, it may. But it seems as if that's not the case, either. Glaciers all over the world have been shrinking now for quite a while.

My point is simply that whether Global Warming is a natural cyclical phenomenon or not, we shouldn't accellerate it. And injecting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere en masse is achieving simply that.

If the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets were to melt and raise sea levels by a few feet, it will be disastrous for sea-level cities, where most of the world's populations live, incidentally.
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools


Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
Has summer arrived yet for you? anglepose Earth science 10 2 Weeks Ago 08:58 AM
Cassini Finds Lakes on Titan's Arctic Region C1ay Science News 2 07-31-2006 09:20 AM
Arctic, Antarctic, Mars Turtle Science News 4 07-02-2006 01:05 AM
Gravitation anomaly observed UncleAl Physics and Mathematics 3 08-08-2005 02:57 PM
Huge 2004 stratospheric ozone loss tied to solar storms, Arctic winds C1ay Science News 0 03-01-2005 07:02 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008