| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Understanding | Evaluating matrices with negative integers? Im struggling with how to evaluate matrices with negative integers and am looking for help. As far as i can understand the negative integer causes the matrix to be inverted, so does this mean that i multiply the matrix by 1/A and also invert the vectors? For example, consider a 2x2 matrix (a11, b12, a21, b22) with 3, -2, 4, -5 respectively. Does this become (b22, -b12, -a21, a11), -5, 2, -4, 3? Also, will the inverse be 1/(ad-bc)? Such that it becomes 1/(3*-5) - (2*-4) leading to a multiple of -0.142857142.. This seems bizarre and i think im doing something wrong, can anyone tell me if im doing it wrong or im on the right track please? Edit: Nevermind, im on the right track. The multiple can be left as a fraction making it seem less bizarre ![]() Last edited by geko; 04-16-2008 at 06:04 AM. Reason: No longer need help | |
| ||
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Hypographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Evaluating matrices with negative integers? Glad you figured it out! ![]() ---------------- Your Friendly Neighborhood AdministratorWant to sponsor Hypography? Buy a print in our Fall 2008 Benefit Sale Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. - Carl Sagan | |
| ||
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Creating | Although geko notes he’s answered his own question, for anyone puzzled by this thread, let me offer my take on the question and its answer. I believe the question is “how do you get the inverse of a matrix?” As I’ve heard the term most commonly used, the inverse of a matrix means a matrix such that , where is a unit matrix. For the example given in post one, the matrix, its inverse, their 2x2 unit matrix product are:![]() It’s neater to extract a constant from B and write it ![]() Inverse of this kind are only meaningful for square (same number of columns and rows) matrixes. Calculating the inverse of a matrix is pretty easy: Start with a matrix A and a unit matrix B of the same size; Multiply the rows of A by scalars and add them together as needed to change it into a unit matrix; For every operation performed on a row of A, perform the same operation on B; When complete, B is the inverse of A. If it’s impossible to change A into a unit matrix, it has no inverse. If you do this calculation symbolically (with variables), you’ll find that the inverse of ![]() is ![]() From this, we can get the quick-and-easy rule “swap the diagonals, negative the other diagonals, and divide by the determinant. ---------------- Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies ![]() | |
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question on matrices | emzz | Questions and Answers | 2 | 09-03-2007 04:26 AM |
| Negative inertia | sciman55 | Physics and Mathematics | 17 | 05-26-2006 08:20 PM |
| Negative integers | tarak | Physics and Mathematics | 5 | 02-13-2006 06:27 AM |
| Statisitical View Of Integers Grouped By Number Of Divisors | Turtle | Physics and Mathematics | 25 | 07-14-2005 11:05 AM |
| Negative Pressure | Aki | Physics and Mathematics | 12 | 10-16-2004 11:08 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:12 PM.























