|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: new (?) perpetual motion idea
Well, we all know that the maximum theoretical efficiency of any machine can not exceede 100% and 100% is only possible in a frictionless universe. Though some systems seem to exceede this, as an example, the black-bird, since the engine was partly driven by the air compression, and the front shroud of the engine could move in and out providing more or less air pressure on demand, at full speed 80% + of the thrust that the engine produced was produced by the air pressure on the compression blades on the front of the engine, this is opposed to 20% or less in subsonic operation, thus the faster you went the more fuel you saved.
Even though this seems counter-intuitive, it's not, just simply that the faster you went, the more efficiently energy regeneration techniques made the engine operate, and it also does not mean over 100% mechanical efficiency as fuel was still burned (and at astounding rates).
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
 |
