Welcome TEguy to this forum
, ill reply in some quotes. Its 3 AM here but new posts enjoy me in writeing some replys
.
First of all, if you read all posts you will now that me and my friend have working, really working model of perpetual motion machine and we are still searching how to make it publish (see my old posts).
But it seems no winning for us.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TEguy
I think people get a bit carried away with what is perpetual and what is not. I think that strictly speaking you can't have a true perpetual motion device because of friction and heat losses etc...
|
There are lot of definitions of what perpetual machine really is. We modificate expression like this.
1. Doesnt matter if perpetual motion machine needs starting impuls or not.
2. It must not be working with any king of gravity force. (If yes, its good but mot perpetual
)
3. If device product energy to repair or to restore its functionality and some free usable energy, than it is perpetual motion device.
We do not need to test perpetual device for infinite time or 10 neather 100 years. If it can product as much energy as required for its working state plus anything to it, it is simple perpetual.
Of course such device must have eficiency of 150 % and more (my opinion).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TEguy
I think the people in this forum put together have more potential than any one single person who ever attempted this sort of thing. I think it would be great if someone has completely and truly given up on their idea they should share it with everyone else in this forum and allow others to solve the problem that had brought the concept at a halt.
|
This is really nice thinking. But problem start if someone will success. I do not have problem present several ideas here. I can save you very lot of time, because we spend really huge amount sum of money for building up to 40 realizations, all looks very good at first stage, but at the final they do not work. And idea was good. Theoreticaly they should work. Most of them doesnt brake any physic laws. Its just in angle of look.
Im really interested if someone else will make different machine work, ill help as much as i can. It seems that there is not just one possible realization. I know about 3 more modification of our device which can work now. But trully it is very long time of hard work. Many years.
Please do not be negative to this opinion. Its not so easy as just tell it anywhere in forum or fire it to media throught world.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TEguy
Musical mechanic in case no one answered your question couse I’m not sure now, A good magnetic shield is a piece of steel. Put a piece of steel between two magnets and they will not repel each other, even when like poles are facing. The problem I guess then is you can’t have a magnetic shield that is not affected by the magnet it is shielding. It’s been keeping me awake at night this one.
If anyone knows of a way to shield a magnet without the shielding medium being affected by the magnet other than a great distance, please let us know. You might be saving the world.
|
I can help you with this problem. It is not true what you wrote down. It is similar to usual subwoofer or any other repro magnet. If you look at it, it has shealding. It means box from steel without one side (you will use that side for entering magnet in it). Then magnet is shield from all sides except one where is looking its face.
It is not possible to make shielding as just put some piece of steel between magnets. Then if you know how looks diagram of magnet forces you can imagine it like all force of magnet is forwarding to unshielded side, so it is as much as almost 2x stronger then unshielded magnet. All other sides are without any magnetic force, because all magnet forces are shorted to margin of unshielded face. Its similar to electricity. Easyest way is where forces goes. If i find how i can post an image of such magnet here from one of our experiments.
This is fine but unusuable, because forces are very strong in all directions.
It works as nice as if you put the box with magnet to other metal (at shielded side, there is no magnetic strong, clean zero. Another good thing is that magnet does not demagnetize itself in this shield. So you can test it, but we make several tests and it is not useable (of course we can be wrong).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TEguy
I didn’t hear anyone mention the Perendev motor. Has anyone heard what the latest is? It was very promising and then it went quiet.
|
Perendev motor cristalize to clean big bubble. As fast as they introduce it to world and start receiving orders with payment, as fast they gone.
They was not able to prove that their motor is not falsum. There are just few videos over the net, and all are taken from bad angles and there is no starting sequence of device except one, where you can see device just from one side.
We made a replic of this motor and as we thank before, it was all fake. Shielding neodym magnets is just fort they maximum force. But basic problem is that there is no way how to make this device unbalanced to extract rotary force. Any possible variants of all three rotor disks make all magnet positions to balanced zero state, so no rotation is generated. All video sequence was taken when some device startmachine work to high rotation and device itself work just as balance wheels (wery heavy and long time whenit stops).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TEguy
I have many concepts in my head most of them I can see why will not work. But with one concept so far I haven’t figured out why it should not work. I am planning on building something simple to find out what will happen.
|
If you can describe it a little maybe we can help you with right way or maybe we can find some solution here (or maybe there is some simple mistake you cannot see). As you want.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TEguy
Hope none of you have given up. IT CAN BE DONE. Even if it is as perpetual as a permanent magnet is permanent. Magnets are cheap, using them for generating power even for a finite period of time beats polluting the environment and relying on oil companies.
|
Clean true.
Nothing just agree.
See ya,
Geronimo.
Re: Perpetual motion
