Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Alternative theories > Silly Claims Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2009   #1 (permalink)
buddha elämuni's Avatar
Thinking


 
buddha elämuni is infamous around these partsbuddha elämuni is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
CREATION scientifically.

Strange that science can not yet tell how the creation took place/happend!

In this way it went/goes.

CREATION scientifically.

There are only three different types of things.

1. Thought

2. Energy

3. Space


All, therefore, consists of one and the same thing which can be called energy. Energy is a state does not change. Space does not expand or bend/curv.

The idea of God or the creator of the intelligent designer, namely me, he created the even-fold universe force our ideas on energy. Me, he moved to a steady state of scattered energy density energyconcentrations ideas about force. We wanted to experience for ourselves and forget about everything for everything. Now we are once again finding themselves ourselves.

All phenomena can be explained by the pressure fluctuation based on the fact that the energy of atoms changes the nucleus at all times less energy, high-density mode, which is not expanding or bending/curving!

What else nucleus of atoms could be as one and the same energy which can be called?

Surely there is a so-called. protons and neutrons which is so called quarks, but all of these in a separate energy concentrations comprise one and the same thing that we like to call energy. At one and the same issue has ability snuggle up smaller area mode, in which energy is more densely and the ability to deploy larger area mode when energy is less frequent.

The whole visible universe is the history of the energy density of atoms in the nucleus has changed in less high-density, and this has resulted in pressure fluctuations, etc.




Otherwise it will not create the need!

Now you know how it happened in creation. You were involved in creating this universe and you were involved forget about ourselves. Now you're a part of discovering ourselves.

Nice time for us!

One Simple Principle Introduction*

.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009   #2 (permalink)
stereologist's Avatar
Questioning


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: CREATION scientifically.

How do you know that everything falls into those 3 categories?
Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009   #3 (permalink)
buddha elämuni's Avatar
Thinking


 
buddha elämuni is infamous around these partsbuddha elämuni is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: CREATION scientifically.

Should physicists eat testosterone that they understand the same as me?

I produce testosterone is too much and it creates a sense of pressure in the left side of the brain. Therefore, the more I use the right side of my brain.

The problem is that other part to think creatively in the same left-side brain.

Ask some of Savant what they are think about onesimpleprinciple of idea.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009   #4 (permalink)
buddha elämuni's Avatar
Thinking


 
buddha elämuni is infamous around these partsbuddha elämuni is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: CREATION scientifically.

Perhaps physicists should take 15 minutes, the dose per pulse magnetic brain's left of that first? Then they too can handle the new physics at the right side of the brain?

Toista | Yle Areena | Yle.fi


There is some finnish, but everything important with english.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009   #5 (permalink)
GAHD's Avatar
Creating

Administrator

Location:
Winterpeg, Manitoba
 
GAHD has a brilliant futureGAHD has a brilliant futureGAHD has a brilliant futureGAHD has a brilliant futureGAHD has a brilliant futureGAHD has a brilliant futureGAHD has a brilliant futureGAHD has a brilliant future
Send a message via ICQ to GAHD Send a message via AIM to GAHD Send a message via MSN to GAHD Send a message via Yahoo to GAHD
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Thumbs down Re: CREATION scientifically.

Word salad describes both your post and the link in it.
You say nothing, try to sound like you know something, and come of to those who do know as a fool with thinly veiled religious motives.


----------------
Sometimes a Hypography Forum Administrator



"With a big enough engine, even a brick will fly." -Law of Aerospace
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009   #6 (permalink)
carlton-temple's Avatar
Thinking


 
carlton-temple is a glorious beacon of lightcarlton-temple is a glorious beacon of lightcarlton-temple is a glorious beacon of lightcarlton-temple is a glorious beacon of light
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: CREATION scientifically.

Queen Victoria, him very fine man, him big creation man got many little peoples.

Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009   #7 (permalink)
Boerseun's Avatar
Phantom Cow of Justice

Moderator

Location:
Hartbeespoort, South Africa
 
Boerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: CREATION scientifically.

You make me universe, me love you long time!

Whooooooo! Lookit' em squirrels on the ceiling!

Dude, I have no idea what you're on. But it sounds groovy. And slightly illegal.


----------------
Hypography Forums Moderator

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII



Ecce bos taurus justitia
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009   #8 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: CREATION scientifically.

Some math would be helpful..

It would cut down on the word confusion by about 100%


----------------
When you go, you may take nothing with you except that which can be held in your heart. Fill it wisely.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009   #9 (permalink)
lemit's Avatar
Exploring

Junior Moderator
Senior Editor
Editor
Platinum Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
Colorado
 
lemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond reputelemit has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: CREATION scientifically.

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha elämuni View Post

There are only three different types of things.

1. Thought

2. Energy

3. Space
There are two groups of people: those who divide people into two groups and those who don't.

(Yes, I know it's an old joke.)

--lemit


----------------


A mind is a terrible thing to close.

Entropy is just nature's way of telling us it's time to slow down.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2009   #10 (permalink)
stereologist's Avatar
Questioning


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: CREATION scientifically.

I thought the old joke was, "There are those that pee in their wetsuits, and then there are those that say they don't."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Creation of the Universe...or Not questor Astronomy and Cosmology 28 10-11-2008 08:29 PM
Creation vs. Evolution snydley Biology 37 04-20-2008 09:15 PM
What is more important; socially or scientifically based evolution? New-ideas Political sciences 20 06-27-2007 09:17 AM
Hell Explained Scientifically EWright Watercooler 5 06-26-2007 05:33 AM
Law of Creation Guadalupe Physics and Mathematics 13 10-09-2005 09:36 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Should Hypography have a forum dedicated to Plant Sciences?
Yes - 69.57%
16 Votes
No - 13.04%
3 Votes
Maybe - 17.39%
4 Votes
Total Votes: 23
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network