Is the United States ready for a President who speaks to the populace like adults?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008
Freddy's Avatar
Understanding

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 463
Freddy is a glorious beacon of lightFreddy is a glorious beacon of lightFreddy is a glorious beacon of lightFreddy is a glorious beacon of lightFreddy is a glorious beacon of lightFreddy is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Is the United States ready for a President who speaks to the populace like adults

Quote:
Originally Posted by C1ay View Post
Yes, the Constitution conveyed no citizenship rights until the Bill Of Amendments. There were laws passed by the legislature concerning the citizenship of immigrants but they did not come from the Constitution and they granted no rights. They also conflicted with the various state laws which was the root of the problem with slavery. That's why the 14th Amendment explicitly granted federal citizenship to the citizens of the states. Prior to this slaves were only considered 2/3 a man and they had no rights.
Article I: The Legislative Branch
Section 8: The Powers of Congress
Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

Clearly the naturalization laws of 1790, 1795, 1798, and 1802 were allowed by the above power given to Congress by the Constitution.
__________________
"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008
C1ay's Avatar
¿42?
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 33.78N 84.66W
Posts: 5,654
C1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant future
Re: Is the United States ready for a President who speaks to the populace like adults

I'm not saying people couldn't become citizens, I'm saying the Constitution gave them no rights. All of the people's rights were in the hands of the state governments until the Bill Of Rights was added. The lack of a bill of rights was one of the key reasons that several delegates refused to sign the Constitution at the Constitutional Convention.
__________________
Clay

Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
Add yourself to Hypography's Frappr.
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008
Creating
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Editor

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Posts: 4,385
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
Post An election game

As Reason notes in post #40 the apportionment of US electors is closer to the based-on-population apportionment of members of Congress’s House of Representatives than the 2-per-state of its Senate. It’s actually based on the sum of each state’s Senators and Representatives, except that DC, which has no senators and one non-voting representative, nonetheless gets 3 electors. The individual state legislatures, and, for DC, Congress, determines how the slate of electors are chosen. In all but Maine (4 electors) and Nebraska (5), have some form of “winner-takes-all”, where the candidate who wins the popular vote, or the greatest number of nearly equal-population districts, wins all the electors.

The history, purpose, strengths, weaknesses, and fairness of this scheme is a complicated, lengthy and controversial subject. However, with a few simplifying assumptions, one can pretty easily make a non-trivial game of it, like this:
  • Each player (candidate) has a given amount of money
  • The probability of winning one representative worth of votes (about 5,000, at typical recent voter turnouts) is proportional to the money spent in its state
  • Ties are decided randomly (“coin toss”)
  • The candidate winning the most districts is assumed to also have won the statewide vote
  • The actual elector selecting rules (winner-take-all or proportional) for each state apply
This is a “limited knowledge” game – if one player knows the other’s spending of his money, he has a great advantage. There are, therefore, several fair ways to play the game:
  • Players allocate their money simultaneously
  • Players allocate their money in a series of turns, either simultaneous or staggered
Here’re a few plays of the game, with trivial money allocations. In the first plays, all players allocate $1 to each state, so the election outcome is random. In the second, player 2 (“cand 2”) has twice as much money as 1, and both allocate it evenly as before:
Code:
State Abbrs: AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DC DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY
# of Reps:   7  1  8  4  53 7  5  1  1  25 13 2  2  19 9  5  4  6  7  2* 8  10 15 8  4  9  1  3* 3  2  13 3  29 13 1  18 5  5  19 2  6  1  9  32 3  1  11 9  3  8  1

Cand 1 :   1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1
Cand 2 :   1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1

1 wins:      2  1* 4* 2* 15 2  3* 1* 1* 16*4  2* 1* 13*5* 3* 2* 2  2  1* 5* 8* 5  2  1  4  0  3* 3* 1* 6  1  15*4  0  6  4* 1  13*2* 4* 0  7* 13 1  1* 5  6* 1  2  1* 
2 wins:      5* 0  4  2  38*5* 2  0  0  9  9* 0  1  6  4  2  2  4* 5* 1  3  2  10*6* 3* 5* 1* 0  0  1  7* 2* 14 9* 1* 12*1  4* 6  0  2  1* 2  19*2* 0  6* 3  2* 6* 0  
Wins: 207 229*  States: 28 23  Electors: 250 288*  

1 wins:      4* 1* 2  2  28*2  4* 1* 1* 18*5  2* 1  13*5* 3* 3* 3* 3  0  4* 6* 4  3  1  3  1* 1  1  1  4  3* 12 8* 0  10*3* 2  13*1  3* 0  2  20*1  1* 4  6* 1  4  1* 
2 wins:      3  0  6* 2* 25 5* 1  0  0  7  8* 0  1* 6  4  2  1  3  4* 2* 4  4  11*5* 3* 6* 0  2* 2* 1* 9* 0  17*5  1* 8  2  3* 6  1* 3  1* 7* 12 2* 0  7* 3  2* 4* 0  
Wins: 225* 211  States: 26 25  Electors: 317* 221  

1 wins:      2  1* 3  2* 33*2  4* 1* 1* 11 3  0  0  10*7* 3* 2* 1  4* 2* 2  5* 6  5* 3* 4  1* 2* 2* 0  8* 2* 15*7* 1* 10*4* 2  9  2* 3  1* 4  17*2* 1* 4  6* 1  4* 1* 
2 wins:      5* 0  5* 2  20 5* 1  0  0  14*10*2* 2* 9  2  2  2  5* 3  0  6* 5  9* 3  1  5* 0  1  1  2* 5  1  14 6  0  8  1  3* 10*0  3* 0  5* 15 1  0  7* 3  2* 4  0  
Wins: 226* 210  States: 33 18  Electors: 344* 194  

...

1 wins:      2  0  3  3* 28*3  1  1* 0  10 8* 2* 2* 11*6* 3* 1  2  1  1* 3  4  8* 4* 1  6* 0  1  3* 1  4  2* 16*5  1* 6  5* 3* 10*1  4* 1* 1  5  1  1* 6* 2  2* 4  1* 
2 wins:      5* 1* 5* 1  25 4* 4* 0  1* 15*5  0  0  8  3  2  3* 4* 6* 1  5* 6* 7  4  3* 3  1* 2* 0  1* 9* 1  13 8* 0  12*0  2  9  1* 2  0  8* 27*2* 0  5  7* 1  4* 0  
Wins: 200 236*  States: 26 25  Electors: 282* 256  

Cand 1 :   1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1
Cand 2 :   2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2  2

1 wins:      2  0  5* 2* 21 3  3* 1* 1* 9  5  0  0  4  2  2  2  2  4* 1* 2  3  5  3  1  4  0  0  2* 1* 1  1  13 3  1* 6  2  1  3  0  4* 0  2  10 0  1* 4  1  0  1  1* 
2 wins:      5* 1* 3  2  32*4* 2  0  0  16*8* 2* 2* 15*7* 3* 2* 4* 3  1  6* 7* 10*5* 3* 5* 1* 3* 1  1  12*2* 16*10*0  12*3* 4* 16*2* 2  1* 7* 22*3* 0  7* 8* 3* 7* 0  
Wins: 145 291*  States: 13 38  Electors: 67 471*

1 wins:      1  0  1  1  20 1  0  0  1* 5  2  1  0  5  5* 1  1  3* 1  1  4* 3  6  4  2* 1  0  0  1  1  5  1  9  8* 1* 8  3* 1  3  0  3* 0  0  12 1  0  3  3  1  2  1* 
2 wins:      6* 1* 7* 3* 33*6* 5* 1* 0  20*11*1* 2* 14*4  4* 3* 3  6* 1* 4  7* 9* 4* 2  8* 1* 3* 2* 1* 8* 2* 20*5  0  10*2  4* 16*2* 3  1* 9* 20*2* 1* 8* 6* 2* 6* 0  
Wins: 137 299*  States: 10 41  Electors: 75 463*

1 wins:      4* 0  2  1  17 4* 3* 0  0  5  3  1* 1* 8  1  1  1  2  1  0  4* 1  4  4  1  2  0  1  1  1  5  2* 8  5  1* 5  1  2  3  1* 2  0  3  14 1  0  1  2  2* 2  1* 
2 wins:      3  1* 6* 3* 36*3  2  1* 1* 20*10*1  1  11*8* 4* 3* 4* 6* 2* 4  9* 11*4* 3* 7* 1* 2* 2* 1* 8* 1  21*8* 0  13*4* 3* 16*1  4* 1* 6* 18*2* 1* 10*7* 1  6* 0  
Wins: 135 301*  States: 11 40  Electors: 64 474*

1 wins:      1  0  4  1  15 3  2  0  0  9  3  0  0  7  2  0  0  5* 2  0  3  7* 4  1  3* 3  1* 2* 0  1* 6  2* 13 2  1* 8  2  3* 5  1* 0  0  1  6  1  0  6* 2  1  3  1* 
2 wins:      6* 1* 4* 3* 38*4* 3* 1* 1* 16*10*2* 2* 12*7* 5* 4* 1  5* 2* 5* 3  11*7* 1  6* 0  1  3* 1  7* 1  16*11*0  10*3* 2  14*1  6* 1* 8* 26*2* 1* 5  7* 2* 5* 0  
Wins: 143 293*  States: 12 39  Electors: 72 466*
If anyone is interested in trying the game, we can start a thread for it, using PMs if several people want to play completive keeping their allocation secret, or in the open for playing against oneself or using a honor or rounds system.

The number of states and elector rules can, of course, be tweaked as desired.

For people with a MUMPS interpreter, here’s the code that produces the above (slightly cleaned up) output:
Code:
f  r R q:'(R)  s I=((R,";",(R,";")),":") i (I) s @I=R ;XRX: read xecute code
n (XGEC) x XGEC(1),XGEC(3) f  x XGEC(4),XGEC(6),XGEC(5) r "  Repeat? NO/ ",R,! q:(R,"no","NO")?1(1"",1"N".1"O") ;XGEC: The electoral college game
n (XGEC,SA,SR,AE) r "State Abbrs: ",R,! x XGEC(2) s SA=R r "# of Reps:   ",R,! x XGEC(2) s SR=R r "# Senators:  ",AE,! ;XGEC(1)
n (XGEC,R) x XGEC(2,1),XGEC(2,2) ;XGEC(2)
s R=(R,":",(R,":")) f  q:R'["  "  s (R,"  ",1,2)=(R,"  ")_" "_(R,"  ",2) ;XGEC(2,1)
s:(R)=" " (R)="" s:(R,(R))=" " (R,(R))="" ;XGEC(2,2)
n (XGEC,MS) k MS f I=1:1 w "Cand ",I," :",?13 r R,! q:R=""  x XGEC(2) s MS(I)=R ;XGEC(3)
n (XGEC,W,WV,WS,SR,AE,MS) x XGEC(4,1),XGEC(4,2) ;XGEC(4): determine winner
n (T,SR,MS) s T="" f J=1:1:(SR," ") f I=1:1:(MS(""),-1) s (T," ",J)=(MS(I)," ",J)+(T," ",J) ;XGEC(4,1): total MS(I)
n (XGEC,W,WV,WS,SR,AE,MS,T) k WV s (W,WV,WS)="" f J=1:1:(SR," ") x XGEC(4,2,1),XGEC(4,2,2) s SRJ=(SR," ",J),(WS," ",IW)=(WS," ",IW)+1 x XGEC(4,3,(SRJ["*":2,1:1)) ;XGEC(4,2)
n (SR,WJ,WV,MS,T,J) s WJ="" f K=1:1:(SR," ",J) s R=((T," ",J)) f I=1:1:(MS(""),-1) s R=R-(MS(I)," ",J) i R<0 s (WJ," ",I)=(WJ," ",I)+1,(WV," ",I)=(WV," ",I)+1,(WV(I)," ",J)=((WV(I))," ",J)+1 q ;XGEC(4,2,1)
n (XGEC,WJ,J,WV,IW) x XGEC(4,2,2,1) s (IW)="",IW=(IW," ",((IW," "))+1),(WV(IW)," ",J)=(WV(IW)," ",J)_"*" ;XGEC(4,2,2): find top I
s (M,IW)="" f I=1:1:(WJ," ") s N=(WJ," ",I) s:N>M IW="",M=N s:M=N IW=IW_" "_I ;XGEC(4,2,2,1)
s (W," ",IW)=(W," ",IW)+SRJ+AE ;XGEC(4,3,1): winner take all allocation method
s (W," ",IW)=(W," ",IW)+AE f I=1:1:(WJ," ") s (W," ",I)=(W," ",I)+(WJ," ",I) ;XGEC(4,3,2): congressional district allocation method
n (XGEC,W,WV,WS) s R=W x XGEC(5,1),XGEC(5,2) s W=R,R=WV x XGEC(5,1),XGEC(5,2) s WV=R w "Wins: ",WV,"  States: ",WS,"  Electors: ",W ;XGEC(5): mark winners
s (M,IW)="" f I=1:1:(R," ") s N=(R," ",I) s:N>M M=N,IW="" s:N=M IW=IW_" "_I ;XGEC(5,1)
f J=2:1:(IW) s I=(IW," ",I),(R," ",I)=(R," ",I)_"*" ;XGEC(5,2)
n (SA,MS,WV) f I=1:1:(MS(""),-1) s NN=(WV(I)) w I," wins: ",?13 f J=1:1 s L=((SA," ",J))+1,N=(NN," ",J),(N,"*")=+N w (N_("",L),1,L) i J=(SA," ") w ! q ;XGEC(6): display wins by state

x XGEC
__________________
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
infantile


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guantanamo Bay: Shame on you, United States Michaelangelica Social sciences 218 07-18-2008
You are called upon by the next President of the United States to head up a.... damocles Social sciences 51 07-24-2007
Madam Speaker, The President of the United States InfiniteNow Social sciences 33 07-03-2007
Theocratic United States? TheBigDog Social sciences 52 11-07-2006
Starting a company in the United States... matrixscarface Social sciences 2 03-28-2006

» Current Poll
Do you read popular science books?
Yes, a few each year - 60.00%
6 Votes
Yes, but very rarely - 10.00%
1 Vote
Yes, most of the time - 20.00%
2 Votes
No - 10.00%
1 Vote
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network