Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Sociology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2008   #51 (permalink)
charles brough's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
Florida
 
charles brough is a glorious beacon of lightcharles brough is a glorious beacon of lightcharles brough is a glorious beacon of lightcharles brough is a glorious beacon of lightcharles brough is a glorious beacon of light
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: No one blames over-population for our diminishing natural resources! WHY NOT?

Hay Paigetheoracle, we all three are on the same side, aren't we? Perhaps we have worn this thread down now. It may be time to stop.

chas.


----------------
charles, http://atheistic-science.com
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008   #52 (permalink)
Essay's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Colorado, Earth
 
Essay has a brilliant futureEssay has a brilliant futureEssay has a brilliant futureEssay has a brilliant futureEssay has a brilliant futureEssay has a brilliant futureEssay has a brilliant futureEssay has a brilliant future
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: No one blames over-population for our diminishing natural resources! WHY NOT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by charles brough View Post
Hay Paigetheoracle, we all three are on the same side, aren't we? Perhaps we have worn this thread down now. It may be time to stop.

chas.
...stumbles into the room. "Oh no, just when I have a few minutes...."
{Hey, did you see? The election is over; we made it to this side of Nov. 4th.
...and as it turns out: YESBAMA!}

Sorry, I've been busy... Gobama.

My friends.... {hehe} ...but seriously....
There's more to say here, isn't there?

Can't we support about 9 billion people here, if we manage our resources very effectively, in a sustainable way?

That is the task before us (...speaking of Obama), unless you opt for the easy solution of radical population reduction (which I know is very likely, etc., but still doesn't have to be the guiding principle).

Maybe later I can add more, but for now there is this rough draft of a poem that may ...say something. [Thanks for the inspiration, Charlie Rose....]

CONTINUATION
Such a shame, to lose a brain...
in the course of evolution.
Funny how smart people see, what needs to be...
and limit their contribution.

Well I just had to say, to my friends on the way...
you have to contribute to the conflagration.

There's grandeur in the Big Picture,
despite what Nostradamus saw.

To waste how most among us may,
enjoin sublimity to the sea...

...we may lose some right new angle,
...or Angel of our... ...to Be....
(y'know ...Being).



~ later....

Last edited by Essay; 11-07-2008 at 03:51 PM.. Reason: edit
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008   #53 (permalink)
paigetheoracle's Avatar
Thinking


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: No one blames over-population for our diminishing natural resources! WHY NOT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Essay View Post
...stumbles into the room. "Oh no, just when I have a few minutes...."
{Hey, did you see? The election is over; we made it to this side of Nov. 4th.
...and as it turns out: YESBAMA!}

Sorry, I've been busy... Gobama.

My friends.... {hehe} ...but seriously....
There's more to say here, isn't there?

Can't we support about 9 billion people here, if we manage our resources very effectively, in a sustainable way?

That is the task before us (...speaking of Obama), unless you opt for the easy solution of radical population reduction (which I know is very likely, etc., but still doesn't have to be the guiding principle).

Maybe later I can add more, but for now there is this rough draft of a poem that may ...say something. [Thanks for the inspiration, Charlie Rose....]

CONTINUATION
Such a shame, to lose a brain...
in the course of evolution.
Funny how smart people see, what needs to be...
and limit their contribution.

Well I just had to say, to my friends on the way...
you have to contribute to the conflagration.

There's grandeur in the Big Picture,
despite what Nostradamus saw.

To waste how some among us may,
enjoin sublimity to the sea,

...we may lose some right new angle,
...or Angel of our... ...to Be....
(y'know ...Being).



~ later....
Well it could be the hundredth monkey effect...um! (God only knows - that's especially for Charles; an in joke)
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008   #54 (permalink)
paigetheoracle's Avatar
Thinking


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: No one blames over-population for our diminishing natural resources! WHY NOT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by charles brough View Post
Hay Paigetheoracle, we all three are on the same side, aren't we? Perhaps we have worn this thread down now. It may be time to stop.

chas.
Yeh, it's like arguing with yourself most of the time, with you especially and Sym. is like knowing what he means but still arguing anyway because....
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009   #55 (permalink)
carlton-temple's Avatar
Thinking


 
carlton-temple is a glorious beacon of lightcarlton-temple is a glorious beacon of lightcarlton-temple is a glorious beacon of lightcarlton-temple is a glorious beacon of light
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: No one blames over-population for our diminishing natural resources! WHY NOT?

May I be permitted to make a few demographic observations.
In general, the population of Europe remained as far as we know, pretty much stable up to the 1700 century, regardless of wars, plagues appalling hygiene and so on. Then for reasons unknown the population suddenly began to steadily increase, again regardless of the appalling sanitary conditions and there were as yet no important medical advances. Why? This population increase seems, so far as what records there were, to have been common all over Europe. One of the main sources showing this increase, at least in England, were church registers which in general (for tax purposes), were well kept. Much the same in France, tax and soldiers ! The present situation in Europe seems to be equally odd. Number one political problem in Russia is the falling population. Mongolia's population has dropped so dramatically that huge swathes of land have been hire to the Chinese. In France, were it not for large "breeding" allowances and immigration the problem would be equally desperate, Germany likewise, I believe, but am not sure, eastern Europe is in a similar situation. Scandinavia, on the other hand, has remained demographically stable for generations? Where I live in rural France the "resident" population, which is not unusual, is down to 7/kilometre!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009   #56 (permalink)
Symbology's Avatar
Questioning


Location:
Houston, TX
 
Symbology is a name known to allSymbology is a name known to allSymbology is a name known to allSymbology is a name known to allSymbology is a name known to allSymbology is a name known to all
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: No one blames over-population for our diminishing natural resources! WHY NOT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlton-temple View Post
May I be permitted to make a few demographic observations.
In general, the population of Europe remained as far as we know, pretty much stable up to the 1700 century, regardless of wars, plagues appalling hygiene and so on. Then for reasons unknown the population suddenly began to steadily increase, again regardless of the appalling sanitary conditions and there were as yet no important medical advances. Why? This population increase seems, so far as what records there were, to have been common all over Europe. One of the main sources showing this increase, at least in England, were church registers which in general (for tax purposes), were well kept. Much the same in France, tax and soldiers ! The present situation in Europe seems to be equally odd. Number one political problem in Russia is the falling population. Mongolia's population has dropped so dramatically that huge swathes of land have been hire to the Chinese. In France, were it not for large "breeding" allowances and immigration the problem would be equally desperate, Germany likewise, I believe, but am not sure, eastern Europe is in a similar situation. Scandinavia, on the other hand, has remained demographically stable for generations? Where I live in rural France the "resident" population, which is not unusual, is down to 7/kilometre!
Assuming what you say is accurate, it sounds like it's time to migrate the overpopulated groups of the America's over there.

However from what I know it is still over populated in Great Britain.


----------------
Point: Making the simple complicated is commonplace; making the complicated simple, awesomely simple, that's creativity.
~ Charles Mingus

Counter Point: The simplest solutions are often the cleverest.
They are also usually wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Resources for Learning German jasonchild German forum 5 08-28-2007 08:39 AM
Resources in each country... gribbon Earth science 1 10-03-2006 11:31 PM
AJAX development resources Buffy Computer Science and Technology 17 12-08-2005 09:58 PM
Hubble looks for possible moon resources C1ay Science News 0 10-25-2005 04:44 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Should Hypography have a forum dedicated to Plant Sciences?
Yes - 69.57%
16 Votes
No - 13.04%
3 Votes
Maybe - 17.39%
4 Votes
Total Votes: 23
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network