Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Space
Become a science forums sponsor today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2008   #1 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Astounding Vision


 



Question Terraforming Venus

[Moderator note: this thread was split off from the thread Terraforming Mars, because the two subjects are literally worlds apart]


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Check this out
http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it


Last edited by CraigD; 03-29-2008 at 11:22 AM. Reason: Added moderation note
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2008   #2 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Editor

 



Post Terraforming Venus

Quote:
Originally Posted by modest View Post
Why assume Earth would loose its atmosphere? I don't think it would - at least not quickly. Venus has no magnetic field, more solar wind, and less mass. All that, and more atmosphere then it knows what to do with.
Venus’s atmosphere has been stripped of nearly all of its light molecules, so that it’s now about 96.5% CO2 (mass 44 AMU) and 3.5% N2 (28 AMU), vs. Earth’s 78% N2, 21% O2 (32 AMU), and 1% argon (40 AMU). Being about Earth’s mass (82%) and distance from Sol (72%), Venus should have had an initial composition about like Earth. Counterintuitively, stripping its of more light molecules has resulted in Venus’s atmosphere not only having a higher average molecular mass, but a higher total mass (about 93 times) than Earth’s.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman View Post
All the light molecules like oxygen and nitrogen are gone.
In absolute terms, this isn’t an accurate statement.

Though small as a percentage, note that Venus’s 3.5% nitrogen times its total atmosphere mass of 93 times Earth’s means it has about 4.5 times as much nitrogen as Earth’s 78%. The oxygen in Venus’s 96.5% CO2 atmosphere is over 420 times that of Earth’s 21% O2!
Quote:
Originally Posted by modest View Post
This makes me think, could we more easily terraform Venus by stripping away its atmosphere than terraforming mars?
I don’t think you could just strip Venus’s atmosphere away into space, but rather would have to get as much of the carbon out of it as possible (a carbon sequestration project dwarfing any terrestrial one), and dispose of the freed oxygen. The ideal use of the freed oxygen is to bond with hydrogen into that human-friendliest of molecules, H2O.

A big problem is that Venus doesn’t appear to have much hydrogen left. Its surface temperature is so high there’s nearly no liquid H2O. All its H2O is a gas, which appears to be getting unbonded and swept into space – one of the Venus Express probe major instruments, its ASPERA-4, found that Venus is venting about 1.9 H+ ions for every 1 O+ ion, and small traces of He+, suggesting that nearly all of it is coming from lost H2O.

So, as with Mars’s, terraforming Venus’s atmosphere would likely require adding a lot of hydrogen – which, with what there is to work with in the solar system, comes mostly in the form of H2O ice. Unlike Mars, there’d be a lot of left-over oxygen, which would have to be bound into solids on the surface.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies

Last edited by CraigD; 03-28-2008 at 10:08 PM. Reason: Added a quote and response
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2008   #3 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator

 



Re: Terraforming Venus

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
Venus’s atmosphere has been stripped of nearly all of its light molecules, so that it’s now about 96.5% CO2 (mass 44 AMU) and 3.5% N2 (28 AMU), vs. Earth’s 78% N2, 21% O2 (32 AMU), and 1% argon (40 AMU).
While I could intuitively see how this would be true of Hydrogen, I'm unconvinced of the other elements. Venus has 1.68 \times 10^{19} kg of nitrogen while earth has 4 \times 10^{18} kg. Twenty four percent considering Venus is lighter seems comparable to me. Like a lifeless earth, I wouldn't expect Venus to have Oxygen though I don't know why we'd attribute this to the solar wind. Oxygen's molecular weight is 32 g/mol while carbon dioxide's is 44 g/mol. I would be very supprised if that difference in mass makes the difference between getting stripped or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
Being about Earth’s mass (82%) and distance from Sol (72%), Venus should have had an initial composition about like Earth. Counterintuitively, stripping its of more light molecules has resulted in Venus’s atmosphere not only having a higher average molecular mass, but a higher total mass (about 93 times) than Earth’s.
Can you explain how stripping 75% of the nitrogen would result in such a big carbon dioxide build-up. Are we sure one has something to do with the other?

//edit

Sorry, I had Earth and Venus inverted in my percent calculation up there, I believe the mass of Nitrogen on Venus is 4.2 that of Earth and it is lighter than oxygen. I don't think we can say the oxygen was stripped off or infer that Earth's would be if we lost our magnetic field.


----------------

Last edited by modest; 03-28-2008 at 11:35 PM. Reason: inverse percent
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2008   #4 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Astounding Vision


 



Re: Terraforming Venus

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
Venus’s atmosphere has been stripped of nearly all of its light molecules, so that it’s now about 96.5% CO2 (mass 44 AMU) and 3.5% N2 (28 AMU), vs. Earth’s 78% N2, 21% O2 (32 AMU), and 1% argon (40 AMU). Being about Earth’s mass (82%) and distance from Sol (72%), Venus should have had an initial composition about like Earth. Counterintuitively, stripping its of more light molecules has resulted in Venus’s atmosphere not only having a higher average molecular mass, but a higher total mass (about 93 times) than Earth’s.In absolute terms, this isn’t an accurate statement.

Though small as a percentage, note that Venus’s 3.5% nitrogen times its total atmosphere mass of 93 times Earth’s means it has about 4.5 times as much nitrogen as Earth’s 78%. The oxygen in Venus’s 96.5% CO2 atmosphere is over 420 times that of Earth’s 21% O2!I don’t think you could just strip Venus’s atmosphere away into space, but rather would have to get as much of the carbon out of it as possible (a carbon sequestration project dwarfing any terrestrial one), and dispose of the freed oxygen. The ideal use of the freed oxygen is to bond with hydrogen into that human-friendliest of molecules, H2O.

A big problem is that Venus doesn’t appear to have much hydrogen left. Its surface temperature is so high there’s nearly no liquid H2O. All its H2O is a gas, which appears to be getting unbonded and swept into space – one of the Venus Express probe major instruments, its ASPERA-4, found that Venus is venting about 1.9 H+ ions for every 1 O+ ion, and small traces of He+, suggesting that nearly all of it is coming from lost H2O.

So, as with Mars’s, terraforming Venus’s atmosphere would likely require adding a lot of hydrogen – which, with what there is to work with in the solar system, comes mostly in the form of H2O ice. Unlike Mars, there’d be a lot of left-over oxygen, which would have to be bound into solids on the surface.
Actually in real terms the earth probably has the same or similar amount of both nitrogen and CO2 it's just that water allows these chemicals to sequestered in the rocks of the surface. The first to go would be the water, after the water is gone the carbonate rocks would release all their carbon dioxide and then the temps really start to climb and most all volatile compounds are released into the atmosphere to be swept away by the suns radiation or solar wind. As for left over oxygen that would depend on how much oxygen was bound up in the surface and how much CO2 would be disolved into any ocean that would form after the ice was deposted on the surface. formation of carbonate rocks would take care of the surplus of free oxygen. Of course you would have to sped up the planets revolutions for any changes to have real effects. that might even start up a magnetic field. Be a hot place but it might be livable after all the cO2 was sequestered. I'm betting it would take much longer to terra form Venus than it would Mars!


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Check this out
http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2008   #5 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Editor

 



Post Venus's ancient runaway greenhouse effect

Quote:
Originally Posted by modest View Post
Can you explain how stripping 75% of the nitrogen would result in such a big carbon dioxide build-up. Are we sure one has something to do with the other?
As I understand it, the current composition of Venus’s atmosphere (which is known with pretty high precision, having been directly and remotely measured by several lander and orbiter spacecraft) isn’t due to the loss of fairly massive nitrogen molecules, but to a massive transfer of CO2 from carbon and oxygen formerly in surface carbon and oxygen-bearing solids and liquid H2O – what’s commonly described as a “runaway greenhouse effect”, believe to have occurred anywhere from 2 to 4 billion years ago. Prior to that, Venus is believed to have been fairly Earth-like.

This wikipedia section has a brief description and references of the subject.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2008   #6 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Astounding Vision


 



Re: Venus's ancient runaway greenhouse effect

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
As I understand it, the current composition of Venus’s atmosphere (which is known with pretty high precision, having been directly and remotely measured by several lander and orbiter spacecraft) isn’t due to the loss of fairly massive nitrogen molecules, but to a massive transfer of CO2 from carbon and oxygen formerly in surface carbon and oxygen-bearing solids and liquid H2O – what’s commonly described as a “runaway greenhouse effect”, believe to have occurred anywhere from 2 to 4 billion years ago. Prior to that, Venus is believed to have been fairly Earth-like.

This wikipedia section has a brief description and references of the subject.
One fairly new theory stipulates that a massive impact like the one that is believed to have formed earth's Moon stopped the rotation of Venus and started it turning slowly the opposite direction from the Earths rotation. This impact either didn't form a moon or since it was from the opposite direction than the Earths giant impactor any moon that was formed spiraled down into Venus instead of spiraling out as Earths Moon has. This second impact event and or the slow rotation could have been the trigger that started the runaway greenhouse we see today. Of course all this is highly speculative.


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Check this out
http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2008   #7 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator

 



Re: Terraforming Mars

Why would Venus have it's Oxygen stripped off and not it's Nitrogen? Oxygen is heavier. This theory seems to have more leaky holes than our sister planet out there.

-modest


----------------

Last edited by modest; 03-28-2008 at 11:11 PM. Reason: of = off
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2008   #8 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Astounding Vision


 



Re: Terraforming Mars

Quote:
Originally Posted by modest View Post
Why would Venus have it's Oxygen stripped off and not it's Nitrogen? Oxygen is heavier. This theory seems to have more leaky holes than our sister planet out there.

-modest
That is a good question and my only answer is maybe the oxygen didn't get stripped from the atmosphere but it reacted with the surface and other chemicals to form the sulfer dioxide and sufuric acid seen in the atmosphere. I'm not sure but I think it would also form nitric acid as well. But I'm not completly sure about that. One thing is sure oxygen would not be stable in the atmosphere of Venus with out a contuinous source of resupply. On the earth plants do that. I don't think Venus has much in the way of plant life.


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Check this out
http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2008   #9 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator

 



Re: Terraforming Mars

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman View Post
That is a good question and my only answer is maybe the oxygen didn't get stripped from the atmosphere but it reacted with the surface and other chemicals to form the sulfer dioxide and sufuric acid seen in the atmosphere. I'm not sure but I think it would also form nitric acid as well. But I'm not completly sure about that. One thing is sure oxygen would not be stable in the atmosphere of Venus with out a contuinous source of resupply. On the earth plants do that. I don't think Venus has much in the way of plant life.
I could see that. I suppose we also say that of nitrogen and nitrogen compounds - but there's nothing sure about that.

However, like I said, I don't find it too strange that there's no atmospheric, elemental oxygen. I just thought there might be more evidence linking the loss of Venus' magnetic field and the run-away greenhouse. Perhaps there is and I just need to find it.

-modest


----------------
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008   #10 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Astounding Vision


 



Re: Terraforming Mars

Quote:
Originally Posted by modest View Post
I could see that. I suppose we also say that of nitrogen and nitrogen compounds - but there's nothing sure about that.

However, like I said, I don't find it too strange that there's no atmospheric, elemental oxygen. I just thought there might be more evidence linking the loss of Venus' magnetic field and the run-away greenhouse. Perhaps there is and I just need to find it.

-modest
Actually the loss of water can be atributed to the lack of a magnetic feild. Loss of water means that all the planets CO2 is in the atmosphere. this accounts for the greenhouse effect, pretty straight forward to me. oh yeah slow rotaion probably accounts for the lack of a magentic feild which could have been caused by a giant impactor that hit in the dead wrong orieintation to it's original rotation.


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Check this out
http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Terraforming Mars Thunderbird Space 124 1 Week Ago 04:36 PM
Terraforming Other Planets? Space Emu Space 13 04-30-2006 02:14 AM
Terraforming Mars pgrmdave Space 28 02-06-2006 10:20 PM
Terraforming Mars sundog Space 13 12-03-2004 11:50 AM
Terraforming and cheap space launch Marcus Space 1 06-12-2003 06:56 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network