| | #11 (permalink) | |||||||
| Married man ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: lightspeed Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
---------------- Hypography Science Forums Moderator --- "There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan "We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie | |||||||
| ||||||||
| | #12 (permalink) | |
| Astounding Vision | Re: lightspeed Amazing how gokus simple questions have been complicated into these posts. I say we just repeal the speed of light limit and go on with exploring the galaxy. ![]() ---------------- Michael Life is the poetry of the universe. Love is the poetry of life. Nuclear is the only real option! http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx Check this out http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?" Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it ![]() | |
| ||
| | #13 (permalink) | ||
| Suspended | Re: lightspeed Quote:
you can't magically start gaining mass, understand that superman is not real. the shuttle gets lighter during takeoff because it is burning fuel to accelerate, it is looseing mass no proof of course but then again, rudolf diesel had no proof of a diesel engine before he created it | ||
| |||
| | #14 (permalink) | ||
| Astounding Vision | Re: lightspeed Quote:
---------------- Michael Life is the poetry of the universe. Love is the poetry of life. Nuclear is the only real option! http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx Check this out http://www.conservationfisheries.org...ream_lines.htm Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?" Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it ![]() | ||
| |||
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Thinking | Re: lightspeed Goku, First off when you said "you get fatter the faster you go.", what I think you meant to say is, "The faster an object or particle travels the more MASSIVE it becomes." At least in terms of its relativistic mass. We can show this through the simple equation, M=(gamma)m. This can be easily derived and would be a good exercise for you to do, to become more familiar with relativity and to prove to yourself that my statement is correct. In the equation presented M=relativistic mass, m=rest mass, (gamma)=1/[(1-(v^2/c^2))^(1/2)], v=velocity, and c=speed of light. With this we can show that the theory hold for what we see every day because, when v is small the (gamma) factor is approximately 1, which in turn makes the M approximately equal to m. A good start, now to show that when the object or particle travels at close to the speed of light but NOT the speed of light we can see that the (gamma) factor is going to increase M by a factor of approximately 2.35 if the v=.9c, which is a substantial amount. The final thing that we can prove from this equation is what happens to a particle or object travelling at the speed of light, (because in order to go faster you have to break the barrier of the speed of light.), If v=c we can see that the (gamma) factor is 1/0, and we all know that 1/0 is infinity. The problem with an infinite mass is that you need infinite energy to get to the velocity of light and infinite energy to maintain the velocity, to see it takes infinite energy use E=Mc^2. Where E=energy, M=relativistic mass, and c=speed of light. We have no know source of infinite energy, so it sounds like were out of luck on the front. As for your final question, I do not have a good answer for you except maybe that’s not the right question to be asking. Sometimes in science the question you ask makes all the difference. | |
| ||
| | #16 (permalink) | |
| Thinking | Re: lightspeed Goku, As for your proof, for the Theory of Relativity,thier is plenty of experimental evidence especially now adays that is completely consistent with the theory. Some of the proof is: Perihelion precession of Mercury Deflection of light by the Sun Gravitational redshift of light Post-Newtonian tests of gravity Gravitational lensing Light travel time delay testing Gravitational redshift Frame dragging tests Gavity Probe B (and many more) but I think you should google search "Theory of Relativity Expeiment" and research it before you come to the conclusion thier is no evidence. | |
| ||
| | #18 (permalink) | |
| Married man ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: lightspeed ---------------- Hypography Science Forums Moderator --- "There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan "We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie | |
| ||
| | #19 (permalink) | ||
| Suspended | Re: lightspeed Quote:
maybe i dumded it down a little too much my reality says one doesn't just start increaseing mass i reckon if the particles of your thrust (exhuast gasses, or what ever) do not travel at or beyond light speed you may not acheive light speed has anyone ever actually tried to go light speed? Last edited by goku; 08-17-2008 at 04:13 PM. Reason: added an "o" | ||
| |||
| | #20 (permalink) | |
| Thinking | Re: lightspeed Goku, all I have to say is research it you have the tools Google search it or go to a library. There is no point in a discussion if you will not look at the sources I listed or the mathematical proof I presented to you. By the way we are trying to accelerate things to the speed of light but it takes allot of energy we are getting closer and closer to getting things close to the speed of light. The things we are doing this with are called particle accelerators and the reason we haven’t gotten things to the speed of light is because it takes infinite energy which I stated in a past post. Since it takes a huge amount of energy to just accelerate protons and electrons it is doubtful we have tried to accelerate a human to that speed. Last edited by DI5STURBED; 08-17-2008 at 04:53 PM. | |
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« Spaceship Design
|
Aliens Poll »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lightspeed Internet Block | ThisIsMyName | Computer Science | 3 | 04-29-2008 09:12 AM |
| vision at lightspeed? | sundog | Physics and Mathematics | 4 | 05-12-2004 07:40 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:45 PM.


















