Sedna/Xena confusion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-04-2005   #1 (permalink)
Thinking
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 26
Evanescence is an unknown quantity at this point
Question Sedna/Xena confusion

Hi all,
I have a question that’s been really baffling me and the rest of my science class at school.
Last year it was announced that a ‘10th planet’ was discovered in the outer solar system. It was named ‘Sedna’. It was believed to be red in colour, much smaller than Pluto, and had no moon.
However, recently I read an article in a newspaper that claimed that scientists had found a new 10th planet this year and called it ‘Xena’. It was this time bigger than Pluto and had a moon.
Can someone please explain what’s going on here? Is Xena Sedna under a new name? Is Sedna now not classed as a planet and therefore Xena is the 10th planet? Help!
Evanescence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005   #2 (permalink)
Creating
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Editor
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Posts: 4,512
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sedna/Xena confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evanescence
Is Xena Sedna under a new name? Is Sedna now not classed as a planet and therefore Xena is the 10th planet? Help!
No, Sedna and Xena are completely separate objects. Whether one, both, or neither should be called a planet is under debate among professional astronomers, as is whether Pluto should continue to be called one.

For the past few years, about 3 or so objects Sedna’s size or bigger are being discovered every year. Occasionally, a discovery gets a lot of press coverage, such as Sedna or Xena, but more often, they do not. More than half or recent discoveries have yet to be given nice names, going by names like 2000 CR105, 90482, 003 EL61, and 2005 FY9. By my count, we’re up to about 25 objects that can make a reasonable claim to be called “planets”

I think the consensus among planetary scientists is that it was a mistake to grant Pluto “planet” status, since there are likely hundreds more like it, and we should go back to saying there are 8, stopping with Neptune. Some, like one of Xena’s discoverers, Mike Brown, argues that “planet” isn’t really a scientific term, but a cultural one, so, if the discovery is well known enough, we should go ahead and call it a planet, even if its small, or its orbit weird. A discussion of this can be found in the Space article “Defining 'Planet': Newfound World Forces Action”.

Scienceforums discussed this a few weeks ago in threads "New 10th Planet Discovered" and ”Sun's Tenth Planet Discovered”, if you want to read some of our thoughts on the subject.

However the argument about counting planets turns out, it seems that Xena has stolen Sedna’s moment of glory, and the title “tenth planet.” It’ll be interesting to see if it can hold on to the title, or if people will decide to stop counting at 9, or even back up one to 8.
CraigD is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Confusion and Logic ShadowMind Philosophy and Humanities 85 04-26-2006
Bose PA System CONFUSION orbsycli Computer Science 2 07-29-2005


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network