|  | | Welcome to Hypography, a forum for science and technology. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
10-18-2004
|
#21 (permalink)
| | Resident Atheist |
Aliens Quote: Originally posted by: Stargazer Quote: Originally posted by: Freethinker
What value would there bo to alien visitation, as is typically presented by UFOers? We are a small non-descript planet circling a medium to small sun on the outer arm of our galaxy. What about us would draw attention?
| One might say the same about any of the planets or moons that we have sent probes or even people to...
| That is exactly my point. In each and every space flight we ahve made, there has been an established goal, or set of them. An ROI (yes Return on Investment) is established. It might be subjective in part, such as the original "Moon Race" included political advantage. The US decided it had to beat the USSR to the moon. And the research and needed technical advancements have paid off many fold.
Can we show a direct financial benefit to the Mars roomers we have there right now? Perhaps not based on an ability to mine product from Mars today, but again the technologies have benefit as well as the cash funnelled into the marketplace. Not to mention potential benefits should we find some elements not known here.
But none were just for kicks. To make cute patterns in wheat fields. Or to stick stuff into various orifices of inhabitants. Quote: |
To a sufficiently advanced species, interstellar travel could be as routin as flying is to us.
| But even flying for pure fun has a cost to the person. They get a personal ROI out of their expenditure.
---------------- Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head
Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11 | |
10-19-2004
|
#22 (permalink)
| | Understanding |
Aliens One problem as I see it is that we want to see immediate return on whatever we do, especially in space. Some people say that space exploration and colonization is a waste of money. I suppose it is the same kind of waste as the early European exploration journeys were, for example... What we need is a long term perspective. We might not colonize the moon and Mars tomorrow, but it will happen, and when it happens we might not get the scientific and economic return right away. Also, if alien species wish to observe and study us, then surely they could do it with technology so advanced we wouldn't notice it. | |
10-21-2004
|
#23 (permalink)
| | Explaining |
Aliens Quote: Originally posted by: Stargazer
Also, if alien species wish to observe and study us, then surely they could do it with technology so advanced we wouldn't notice it.
| Alien abduction? But i'm not sure if I'll buy into that. | |
10-21-2004
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Reminiscing |
RE: Aliens Quote: |
and i always thought it stands for 'region of interest'.....
| Bo,
you are also correct. ROI is the military acronym for region of interest. 10 years in Naval Cryptology taught me that.
As for the aliens, didn't any of you watch MIB II??? Of course there are aliens. i just saw a Madonna video earlier. What more proof do you need? 
---------------- "Lucky in love, well maybe so. there's still a lot of things you'll never know...
like why each time the sky begins to snow - you cry..." - Dan Fogelberg | |
10-22-2004
|
#25 (permalink)
| | Understanding |
Aliens Quote: Originally posted by: Aki Quote: Originally posted by: Stargazer
Also, if alien species wish to observe and study us, then surely they could do it with technology so advanced we wouldn't notice it.
| Alien abduction? But i'm not sure if I'll buy into that.
| Neither do I, of course. There is no real evidence anything like that ever happened. What I meant was the possible use of observing us from a great distance, or perhaps use nanotechnology. I'm only speculating in how they could do it, not how they have done it. | |
10-22-2004
|
#26 (permalink)
| | Resident Atheist |
Aliens Quote: Originally posted by: Stargazer
What I meant was the possible use of observing us from a great distance, or perhaps use nanotechnology. I'm only speculating in how they could do it, not how they have done it.
| It would seem, again based on (monetary) ROI, any (military) ROI RE Earth for "Aliens", that unaliened probes, with enhancements thru advanced technologies, would be most cost effective for basic research. Aliened probes, like anything we are working on, would only be needed for colonization or direct intentional contact.
Why wouldn't Aliens want to make formal contact? Would that not be the obvious process? The only reason I could see for not doing so would be based around the concept of not interferring with "Alien" (us) civilization. But if we found intellegent life with-in our travel access area, we'd jump at the chance to make direct contact. Why would other society's not do the same?
---------------- Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head
Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11 | |
10-22-2004
|
#27 (permalink)
| | Explaining |
RE: Aliens Well the Aliens have such high technology compared to us that we don't bring any good to them, so I guess they won't bother meeting us. It's like humans and ants, we only observe them, and we ignore their presence because there is nothing we need to learn from them. | |
10-23-2004
|
#28 (permalink)
| | Resident Atheist |
RE: Aliens Quote: Originally posted by: Aki
we only observe them, and we ignore their presence because there is nothing we need to learn from them.
| I disagree. If ants could have any higher level of communications we would be interacting with it. In fact we strive to understand what our greatest level of communications is with ants. We use it to our advantage in "pest control".
Take any species we know of and there has been an effort to establish the highest level of communications possible with it. The same is true with every other species and every other species. Whenever two species are in geographical proximity enough to interact, they try to "understand" the other. Even an ant as a colony, follows a "reasoned" process to succesfully interact with it's surroundings, including other species. That communications my be a defensive one, such as a bad taste or coloring. But those are forms of communications.
It seems to be emperically connected with existence. Evolutionary hard wiring. Why would we expect extraterrestrials to do otherwise? If an intellegent species was not interested in exploring and interacting with what they find, why would they put any resources into it? Interplanetary vehicles don't grow on trees, or whatever version of life would be equivalent on other planets. Merely by spending resoources on the effort, they have identified themselves as interested in interacting.
---------------- Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head
Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11 | |
10-24-2004
|
#29 (permalink)
| | Understanding |
Aliens Quote: Originally posted by: Freethinker
Why wouldn't Aliens want to make formal contact? Would that not be the obvious process? The only reason I could see for not doing so would be based around the concept of not interferring with "Alien" (us) civilization. But if we found intellegent life with-in our travel access area, we'd jump at the chance to make direct contact. Why would other society's not do the same?
| It would be near impossible to guess what an alien civilization would like to do, especially since they would be all different. I mean, look at the different cultures on Earth, we're all the same species, yet some cultures and societies have been very active in exploring and colonizing new territories, while others seem to pretty much stick around where they are. Why would we like to establish contact with other civilizations? I think that many of us would like to do it because it would broaden our view on ourselves and the universe, and that there could be exciting exchange of ideas, technology, science, culture, etc. Then I am sure there are some of us humans who would like to keep as silent as possible so that the evil aliens wont come and eat our brains. But personally I would be surprised if a civilization with the capacity of space travel and interstellar communication would not want to establish contact at all, ever. But, I suppose whatever they would choose, they have their reasons. Maybe they don't want to interfer with us, maybe we are too different, or whatever. But being very different would make things interesting, wouldn't it... | |
10-24-2004
|
#30 (permalink)
| | Understanding |
RE: Aliens Quote: Originally posted by: Aki
Well the Aliens have such high technology compared to us that we don't bring any good to them, so I guess they won't bother meeting us. It's like humans and ants, we only observe them, and we ignore their presence because there is nothing we need to learn from them.
| There are scientists who do try to, with some success, to communicate with dolphins and chimpanzees. I suppose we wont get much return from them, though... other than that it is possible to communicate with other species. About ants, it made me remember a few lines from Carl Sagan's Contact, where some people get into a discussion on how to communicate with other species, including ants. | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 PM. Hypography? Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography. We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds. | Share the love! Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader! | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
| | |