Spaceship designA forum for the community space ship project.
Advertisement (please log in or register to remove this ad)
Notices
Welcome to the Hypography Science Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, take quizzes, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
There has been a suggestion for a thread like this so I an taking initiative.
Lets say that our spacecraft is orbiting the moon at some height (the less the better, well unless you hit a crater ring . So now we have to initiate deorbiting burn and land somehow.
Options to do that:
Airbag landing: dispersing kinetic energy with rolling on lunar surface
Apollo-like landing: controlled descent with thrusters for deacceleration
Hard landing: from uncomplete deacceleration into "arrow" mode where spacecraft sticks into lunar surface (regolith not only optional ). Cargo itself would have to survive of course, but there is still a lot of stress involved. Maybe if thruster tanks would be used as collapsable front as in cars...
The lower the altitude of the orbit, the harder it is to have a soft landing.
So where is the "sweet spot"?
__________________ Hypography Science Forums Moderator
--- "There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
The lower the altitude of the orbit, the harder it is to have a soft landing.
In what way do you mean?
Orbital speed just skimming the crater tops: 1681m/s
This is the velocity you need to shed to make a soft landing.
Starting at an orbital altitude 100km. First you do a 230m/s burn to put you in a moon grazing elliptical orbit. At perigee, your speed will be 1704m/sec, which is the velocity you need to shed. total delta v = 1934 m/sec, more than the value above.
__________________ "Men are apt to mistake the strength of their feelings for the strength of their argument.
The heated mind resents the chill touch & relentless scruntiny of logic"-W.E. Gladstone
My gut feeling is that the airbag route is safer, albeit less accurate. From lunar orbit, decelerate with retro-rocket then deploy the bag(s) for the drop.
__________________ dare to be naive. ~ r. buckminster fuller
Does anyone know if the Apollo Lunar Module's legs had shock absorbers? I know there were very flimsy sensors extending down from the pads to trigger engine shutoff, but the legs sure don't look like there's anything under the mylar than aluminum poles....
At any rate, I'd think that single-use shock absorbers could be built without too much additional weight, possibly less weight that those big rubber bags....
Shocking,
Buffy
__________________ "If you do not agree with anything I say, I'll not only retract it, but deny under oath that I ever said it!" __________________________________________________ ______________-- Tom Lehrer
"What, you guys couldn’t even wear one of your tuxedo t-shirts? I mean, I know each one of you have one."
Does anyone know if the Apollo Lunar Module's legs had shock absorbers? ...
Yes. I know.
The landing pads had six inches of crushable aluminum honeycomb material. The legs themselves contained something similar between the telescoping segments.
__________________ Hypography Forums Moderator -- - - - - - What concerns me is not the way things are, but rather the way people think things are.
Epictetus, Greek Philosopher The map is NOT the territory.
Korzybski, Polish-American Philosopher
The landing pads had six inches of crushable aluminum honeycomb material. The legs themselves contained something similar between the telescoping segments.
That's single use! And light! At least some "delta v" to be absorbed there!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadam
When using shock absorbers you have to point them...or land on your head
There is a question how much delta v coud an airbag survive.
Obviously the thrusters necessary to "keep you upright" for those "pointed" shock absorbers could be traded off against the all-around padding of an unoriented airbag-protected craft--that is, the latter would require airbags on all sides if you wanted to eliminate the need for the thrusters.
If you're going unoriented though, I'd think you'd need to worry also about the rigging you need to keep the eggs from breaking *inside*. It would have to absorb equally well in all directions too...
An ounce of wall-adhesive is worth a pound of all-the-king's-men,
Buffy
__________________ "If you do not agree with anything I say, I'll not only retract it, but deny under oath that I ever said it!" __________________________________________________ ______________-- Tom Lehrer
"What, you guys couldn’t even wear one of your tuxedo t-shirts? I mean, I know each one of you have one."
Astronomical instruments needed to answer crucial questions, such as the search for Earth-like planets or the way the Universe expands, have come a step closer with the first demonstration at the telescope of a new calibration system for precise spectrographs. The method uses a Nobel Prize-winning technology called a 'laser frequency comb', and is published in this week's issue of Science. Read » | 0 comments
Stanford computer scientists have developed an artificial intelligence system that enables robotic helicopters to teach themselves to fly difficult stunts by watching other helicopters perform the same maneuvers. The result is an autonomous helicopter than can perform a complete airshow of complex tricks on its own. Read » | 0 comments
. So now we have to initiate deorbiting burn and land somehow. 
). Cargo itself would have to survive of course, but there is still a lot of stress involved. Maybe if thruster tanks would be used as collapsable front as in cars...
Re: Soft landing on the moon discussion 
dare to be naive. ~ r. buckminster fuller 
