[ErlyRisa]

Just remmember that ur enlightened understanding.... should be kept to urself! -if u are right, then u realise that u should wait for ur fellow man to catch up - at the very least subconsciencly.

--learning to thwart missconception and steer towards enlightenment is what all of us need to learn how to teach.... hollywood does a great job.

ie . try not to be so blatant --steering anothers mind without them knowing, will illicit thier thought toward the end goal much more effectively than just blurting out a formula.

[rudeonline]

What do you mean with this post? I can not discuss about relativity?

[Tormod]

Ignore the last post, it is pointless.

Your thread is in Strange Claims because you *claim* to have a *theory*, and you have provided what you call *evidence* - but the evidence is not supported by anything. It is only a set if loose ideas and thoughts.

Thus it is a Strange Claim!

Having a post moved to Strange Claims does not necessarily mean that it gets less attention. However, your original post is not very easy to discuss since there is not much to discuss - Einstein's relativity theory explains the speed of light much better than you.

Your idea is interesting and cool but it's not very substantial. If you have more evidence of the "moving through space at the speed of light" idea then it would be a good candidate for the physics forum.

[KickAssClown]

I can accept the speed of light as zero, or infinite even, but that comes from reading a number of papers.

I quiet like the image of one translating along possible paths in space, and thus traversing time.

I will note for the moderators, that though his wording is poor. His statement that c is zero, is not far fetched and actually can be much better substantiated.

Two papers come to mind. Doctor Dick's and a paper I read on faster than light signals through a casmir vacuum that discusses the difference between the invariant speed and maximum speed. Very challenging to grasp, but very comprehensive.

I would encourage Mr. Rudeonline to perhaps go about revising, and revamping his written piece, with an eye towards accuracy, clarity, and accessibility.

[rudeonline]

Sorry, I'm a Dutch native speaker. My Inglish is a problem.

The only question I can have now is ask me what part of my idea you don't understand. I will try to answer all yor questions, also if my Inglish is poor. If someone can tranlate from Dutch to Inglisch.. your welcome!

[rudeonline]

The Mayan Calendar Comes North 01 - Ian Xel...

Maybe this link will tell you something new about consciousness. Take's 3 hours, I don''s believe all that's been said on this video, but it's getting very close..

[Snocrash]

Rude... I thought your idea was pretty intriguing and it definitely should be hashed out some more. So you're saying that light itself doesn't move... but what is actually moving at 300,000 km/sec is the entire universe... is that right? So time slows down because every time we move... we are moving in the opposite direction the universe is going?

I drew a pic to help me visualize this better:



If that's correct then one question comes to mind:

How is it that no matter what direction we move we are always moving opposite to the universe?

[Jay-qu]

This is kind of silly.. why come up with a less intuitive, more complicated way of explaining time dilation, when we already have a model that works fine. Unless there is a way to prove this actually happens and/or show that it works when special rel fails, its useless.

[rudeonline]

How is it that no matter what direction we move we are always moving opposite to the universe?

That's because we ( the "now") are the border of the universe. We always travel opposite of the zeropoint of time. Our movement trought the universe is that we travel trought time. The light does'nt. The speed of light is the absolute point zero of space and time. Like 0 Kelvin is the absolute point zero of temperature.

For the Dutch readers,

Volkskrantblog - Het "nu" als grens van het universum.. - Waarom men de relativiteitstheorie zou moeten omdraaien,

[rudeonline]

Are there still people here?