| ||
| Looking at the various reports and films of flying saucers, the question arises in my mind, why do the majority spin? There must be some advantage to it. I even remember film of a cylinder in Soviet airspace, that corkscrewed away, pursued by fighters (See gun rifling for the same effect with... | ||
| |
|
#30
By
alexander
on
05-31-2008
| ||||
| Re: Why do UFO's spin? Quote:
Quote:
The again, Russians picked up the scram jet project, they are still developing ekranoplans, hopefully still developing ever-more reliable rocket boosters, and still make some of the most innovative and, call me byist, best, in terms of reliability and performance, weapons, in the world.... Those crazy bastards ![]() Quote:
Quote:
And once again, don't take me wrong on this, i am not a pro anything person, i like to look at things rationally, and sometimes find myself pondering the rationality of those decisions to not be too byist(sp?), for hours, till my nose starts bleeding... (literaly) So, i try not to be too byist in this thread, i did start off by attempting to describe that there is more likely then not, another planet with creatures of a sort there. But first of all, when i read the name of this thread, i could not help to think "Why do UFOs spin?" .... "maybe aliens are trying to get that spinning sensation?". I see your frustration of not being taken seriously, but you have to understand that this is a science forum, we don't believe anything until proven, by default, not a case of innocent till proven guilty, no; guilty, until mathematically proven that innocent makes sense, and guilty just does not work in the current model... | ||||
|
#31
By
paigetheoracle
on
05-31-2008
| |
| Quote:
| |
|
Last edited by paigetheoracle; 06-05-2008 at 07:15 AM.
|
|
#32
By
paigetheoracle
on
06-05-2008
|
| To finish off this subject, I shall make some odd points. Firstly, science is about analysis, not reaction. it is easy to dismiss an argument by saying it doesn't make sense because it means you don't have to search further for answers. Reaction is shutting the door on enquiry (ignoring the facts). To quote Sherlock Holmes ' When you've eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, 'no matter how improbable', must be the truth'. Reaction stops you learning as analysis is being open and letting in the light of experience (fresh ideas/ data). Innocense allows progress (creativity/ discovery/ invention)), guilt (knowledge) stops it - Alexander please note: Scientific method or defence of the faith? (The Inquisition and Gallileo). All we can be sure of is effect. The cause of things can be many and various in appearance (All roads lead to Rome/ You have the corpse or injury but who or what caused the condition/ situation, how, when, where and why have yet to be disclosed and proven - that is the (forensic) science of it/ the scientific detective story that must be unearthed ('And yet it moves' Gallileo). Experiencers 'know' there is something in the subject - armchair critics don't because their data is second hand. ('Any truth is better than indefinite doubt' Sherlock Holmes again): Theory versus reality. 'It is easier to know it than to explain why I know it. If you were asked to prove that 2 and 2 made 4, you might find some difficulty, and yet you are quite sure of the fact' (Sherlock Holmes). 'It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts'. Conspiracy theorists doubt man landed on the moon and how are you going to convince them otherwise, unless you stick them in a rocket and blast them up there yourselves, and even then they could convince themselves it was a trick, done to deceive them (It's all belief): The photo's shown to the public could be fakes, made in a studio, either because the quality of the ones shot in the lunar landscape weren't very good or didn't come out. The photographic arguments, like those for Lee Harvey Oswald's shot of him holding a rifle sound convincing (shadows in wrong direction for his face when compared to rest of picture). With regards to the magnetic flux argument, Linda Crystal in her books, insist only hers are genuine because of this force field effect, saying only fogged pictures are real because of this effect (If it's clear, it's faked being her argument). You say this is a science site and physical proof needs to be provided. What I and others like me are saying is that the nuts and bolts argument misses the philosophical one and that is that 'belief' holds a prominent part in what is held up as true or dismissed as false, which has nothing to do with the facts of the case but is surely behind what people do with them. The effect of UFO interaction leaves people overawed or traumatized, like a car accident. To ask them to prove something genuine occurred is like a policeman trying to get the facts from a witness. They may be so thrown by the incident that they can't give you the details and maybe not even recall them because of the way such things throw the mind into confusion. Clear thought is the prerogative of the calm and unruffled, not the worn torn or shocked. As for the effects generated by such sitings - immersive thrill rides or Imax 3-D screenings of films, could explain why they seem so real but may not be or even tell us something about what we assume reality truly is (The Matrix/ Hindu 'Maya'). For all we know, we could just be reality junkies, lost in the illusion that the tricks our minds are playing, actually mean what we are perceiving is genuine, when it isn't |
|
#33
By
Moontanman
on
06-05-2008
|
| Re: Why do UFO's spin? I think the question "Why do UFOs spin" is a flawed question to begin with. I am not a true believer but I do think the UFO phenomenon needs to be investigated. Why is it a flawed question? Mainly I see no evidence in UFOs that they all spin or that even a majority spin. Even the ones that are described as disk or oval shaped seldom are described as spinning. I can think of a reason for disk shaped craft to spin but that doesn't mean they all spin or even most. I do think the UFO phenomenon is so full of BS and people who are also filled with BS it's difficult to winnow out the wheat from the chaff. The is the main reason it's so difficult to take a fleeting sighting at face value. Having said that there are indeed some sightings that flat out defy explanation, they have a huge amount of data from impeccable witnesses and are detected on radar, have pics, multiple witnesses in the air on the ground and some trained military observers. While the fleeting lone person type sighting may really be true it's impossible to really make a call on such a sighting. Far to many skeptics concentrate on any sighting than can be explained away easily or resort to ridicule to destroy the credibility of the witness. Far to many skeptics are so ignorant about celestial objects I rate them on the same level as the guys who see very light in the night sky as alien visitors. I am almost completely sure something important has to be at the root of UFOs, it may indeed be alien visitors or something natural or even something about the human mind, but something is going on. We need to give it serious study to find out. Pointing fingers and making claims and accusations will not prove anything. |
|
#34
By
paigetheoracle
on
06-11-2008
|
| One last interesting question:- If not all UFO's spin, do all celestial bodies and if so why? I've noticed that if you kick something along the ground, it rolls or spins, unless there is reduced friction as on ice. Could it be that this is the material worlds way of dealing with resistance to ensure movement continues? |
|
#35
By
Moontanman
on
06-12-2008
|
| Re: Why do UFO's spin? |
|
#36
By
Turtle
on
06-13-2008
| |
| This is not an UFO, but it is a spinning flying saucer. Spin means stability, although the article does not mention the spin other than in the opening. Quote:
If this turns into a large scale workable aircraft, perhaps some UFO's utilize the same principles. ![]() PS Just saw Moontan's previous post. ![]() ![]() I'll leave this as the quote is good. ![]() | |
|
#37
By
DFINITLYDISTRUBD
on
06-14-2008
| |||
| Re: Why do UFO's spin? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||
|
#38
By
paigetheoracle
on
07-02-2008
|
| Re: Why do UFO's spin? This may sound a little silly but could flying saucers be shaped the way they are for the same reason foam is spun into discs by whirlpools? I saw a program on TV about the Bermuda triangle, where oceanographers said that mounds on the sea bed caused spirals above them, through the action of tides and currents (Think of a fire stick and the backwards and forwards movement of each hand, to generate spin on the stick itself). This made me wonder if the same thing occurred with mountains and air? Could the Egyptians have latched onto this and could this explain the design of the pyramids, for what purpose I can't even speculate at this time but maybe it has to do with kites and thermals? Maybe Flying Saucers use these thermals to glide to Earth too, manipulating local conditions? (Energy saving manoeuvre, even if it couldn't be used for take off). |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Question: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Question Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Question | Question Starter | Category | Comments | Last Post |
| New idea about UFO's! | Moontanman | Space | 80 | 04-14-2008 05:10 AM |
| UFO's in space, apollo 11 | Moontanman | Space | 27 | 03-04-2008 08:59 AM |
| Spin | orbsycli | Psychology | 10 | 11-30-2007 05:46 AM |
| how to visualise the particles of spin 1/2,3/2----- | gccbhu | Physics and Mathematics | 2 | 01-31-2005 06:54 PM |
| particles with spin 3/2 | sanctus | Physics and Mathematics | 1 | 01-30-2005 10:45 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 AM.









Just saw Moontan's previous post. 





