Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Help and Advice > Questions and Answers
Become a science forums sponsor today
Comment
 
LinkBack Question Tools
paigetheoracle's Avatarhttp://hypography.com/forums/ Why do UFO's spin?
paigetheoracle
Posted 05-26-2008
Looking at the various reports and films of flying saucers, the question arises in my mind, why do the majority spin? There must be some advantage to it. I even remember film of a cylinder in Soviet airspace, that corkscrewed away, pursued by fighters (See gun rifling for the same effect with...
  #30  
By alexander on 05-31-2008
Re: Why do UFO's spin?

Quote:
As for God - it depends upon what you define it or him/her as. If it's all existence, then God is within you and all around you. If you think of God as some external force, then you're on the way to avoiding responsibility for your own life and becoming a follower, not self-led (Someone to blame for your own failures). Well that's my opinion anyway.
I won't discuss this topic, like politics, unless you are going to approach it with an open mind, if you really want to go into it, pm me.

Quote:
Russians are working on similar stealth technology at present
lol, i assure you they are not the only ones who are

The again, Russians picked up the scram jet project, they are still developing ekranoplans, hopefully still developing ever-more reliable rocket boosters, and still make some of the most innovative and, call me byist, best, in terms of reliability and performance, weapons, in the world.... Those crazy bastards

Quote:
What propulsion they use to get here is as likely to be understandable to us as plane mechanics are to people living in mud huts
lol, perhaps, though practice shows, sometimes the solution so much simpler then it has ever believed to have to be... also, whoever says that they propell themselves with advanced systems anyways? they could just jump from one point in the universe to another (according to quantum mechanics, its possible and apparently happens on the quantum level all the time anyways)

Quote:
instance scientific investigation that leaves the majority of the population ignorant
yes, well problem is that science describes things, if a scientiffic investigation explained the phenomenon, perhaps it was not, as those open minded people may think, what it was though to be... I find more open minded people believe in all sorts of conspiracy theories, and it seems that you can make them believe those theories rather easily. You are talking about the same group of open minded people, who believe that the twin towers were a covered up CIA operation, and that somebody paid Princes Diana's driver to crash...

And once again, don't take me wrong on this, i am not a pro anything person, i like to look at things rationally, and sometimes find myself pondering the rationality of those decisions to not be too byist(sp?), for hours, till my nose starts bleeding... (literaly)
So, i try not to be too byist in this thread, i did start off by attempting to describe that there is more likely then not, another planet with creatures of a sort there. But first of all, when i read the name of this thread, i could not help to think
"Why do UFOs spin?" .... "maybe aliens are trying to get that spinning sensation?".

I see your frustration of not being taken seriously, but you have to understand that this is a science forum, we don't believe anything until proven, by default, not a case of innocent till proven guilty, no; guilty, until mathematically proven that innocent makes sense, and guilty just does not work in the current model...
Reply With Quote
  #31  
By paigetheoracle on 05-31-2008
Cool Re: Why do UFO's spin?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexander View Post
I won't discuss this topic, like politics, unless you are going to approach it with an open mind, if you really want to go into it, pm me.

(1) I might just do that.

lol, i assure you they are not the only ones who are

(2) I know that too.

The again, Russians picked up the scram jet project, they are still developing ekranoplans, hopefully still developing ever-more reliable rocket boosters, and still make some of the most innovative and, call me byist, best, in terms of reliability and performance, weapons, in the world.... Those crazy bastards

(3) Yes they are because , like every military dictatorship, they ruin their own economy by pursuing defence, to the detriment of nearly everything else in their economy. Look at Burma's fear of letting in aid at the moment - they'd rather let the whole country die from the disaster, than risk it being exploited by outsiders.

lol, perhaps, though practice shows, sometimes the solution so much simpler then it has ever believed to have to be... also, whoever says that they propell themselves with advanced systems anyways? they could just jump from one point in the universe to another (according to quantum mechanics, its possible and apparently happens on the quantum level all the time anyways)

(4) Both these points are brilliant - the latter has been proposed before in UFO circles and as for the former, the blindingly obvious is usually the answer and missed because people are expecting/ wanting something else (You can lead Horst to slaughter but you cannot make him think). To me, I always found rockets fired straight up into space primitive (since the sixties at least) and am amazed that spiral trajectories are not used for vehicles going up (like planes) as well as coming down: Think of the fuel needed to defy gravity by this method, compared to what a conventional craft uses to reach the upper atmosphere as in test flights to the outer edges of space (Reasonable people will give you excuses why it has to be this way (defence of the old) and why the novel (new/pioneering) way is impractical but only experience belies the truth).


yes, well problem is that science describes things, if a scientiffic investigation explained the phenomenon, perhaps it was not, as those open minded people may think, what it was though to be... I find more open minded people believe in all sorts of conspiracy theories, and it seems that you can make them believe those theories rather easily. You are talking about the same group of open minded people, who believe that the twin towers were a covered up CIA operation, and that somebody paid Princes Diana's driver to crash...

(5) Well that's not me - I believe in human foibles (pilot error) and folly in most cases (drunk driver/ poorly designed building) and it is in the interest of those involved to cover up their mistakes, to keep up public belief in their abilities (George Bush/ The original Brinks Mat robbery).

And once again, don't take me wrong on this, i am not a pro anything person, i like to look at things rationally, and sometimes find myself pondering the rationality of those decisions to not be too byist(sp?), for hours, till my nose starts bleeding... (literaly)
So, i try not to be too byist in this thread, i did start off by attempting to describe that there is more likely then not, another planet with creatures of a sort there. But first of all, when i read the name of this thread, i could not help to think
"Why do UFOs spin?" .... "maybe aliens are trying to get that spinning sensation?".

(6) Maybe I should have entitled the thread "Why do 5.4% of UFO's appear to spin?"

I see your frustration of not being taken seriously, but you have to understand that this is a science forum, we don't believe anything until proven, by default, not a case of innocent till proven guilty, no; guilty, until mathematically proven that innocent makes sense, and guilty just does not work in the current model...
(7) That's certainly how it should be but see the human foible quote above. Also this applies to the mind or subjective reality as well as nuts and bolts reality - what tactics work and how? Are we kidding ourselves/ being kidded? Does the car work or have we been sold a lemon? In society the equivalent of scientific thinking is lawful, reasoned thought as opposed to criminal (Does this idea and its execution work, making society a better place or is it a fallacy, the equivalent of a rickety bridge, once stood on that will collapse, revealing nothing underneath to support the proposition? Engineering of the mind - creative or destructive, progressive or regressive?).

Last edited by paigetheoracle; 06-05-2008 at 07:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
By paigetheoracle on 06-05-2008
Cool Re: Why do UFO's spin?

To finish off this subject, I shall make some odd points.

Firstly, science is about analysis, not reaction. it is easy to dismiss an argument by saying it doesn't make sense because it means you don't have to search further for answers. Reaction is shutting the door on enquiry (ignoring the facts). To quote Sherlock Holmes ' When you've eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, 'no matter how improbable', must be the truth'. Reaction stops you learning as analysis is being open and letting in the light of experience (fresh ideas/ data). Innocense allows progress (creativity/ discovery/ invention)), guilt (knowledge) stops it - Alexander please note: Scientific method or defence of the faith? (The Inquisition and Gallileo).

All we can be sure of is effect. The cause of things can be many and various in appearance (All roads lead to Rome/ You have the corpse or injury but who or what caused the condition/ situation, how, when, where and why have yet to be disclosed and proven - that is the (forensic) science of it/ the scientific detective story that must be unearthed ('And yet it moves' Gallileo).

Experiencers 'know' there is something in the subject - armchair critics don't because their data is second hand. ('Any truth is better than indefinite doubt' Sherlock Holmes again): Theory versus reality. 'It is easier to know it than to explain why I know it. If you were asked to prove that 2 and 2 made 4, you might find some difficulty, and yet you are quite sure of the fact' (Sherlock Holmes). 'It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts'.

Conspiracy theorists doubt man landed on the moon and how are you going to convince them otherwise, unless you stick them in a rocket and blast them up there yourselves, and even then they could convince themselves it was a trick, done to deceive them (It's all belief): The photo's shown to the public could be fakes, made in a studio, either because the quality of the ones shot in the lunar landscape weren't very good or didn't come out. The photographic arguments, like those for Lee Harvey Oswald's shot of him holding a rifle sound convincing (shadows in wrong direction for his face when compared to rest of picture).

With regards to the magnetic flux argument, Linda Crystal in her books, insist only hers are genuine because of this force field effect, saying only fogged pictures are real because of this effect (If it's clear, it's faked being her argument).

You say this is a science site and physical proof needs to be provided. What I and others like me are saying is that the nuts and bolts argument misses the philosophical one and that is that 'belief' holds a prominent part in what is held up as true or dismissed as false, which has nothing to do with the facts of the case but is surely behind what people do with them.

The effect of UFO interaction leaves people overawed or traumatized, like a car accident. To ask them to prove something genuine occurred is like a policeman trying to get the facts from a witness. They may be so thrown by the incident that they can't give you the details and maybe not even recall them because of the way such things throw the mind into confusion. Clear thought is the prerogative of the calm and unruffled, not the worn torn or shocked.

As for the effects generated by such sitings - immersive thrill rides or Imax 3-D screenings of films, could explain why they seem so real but may not be or even tell us something about what we assume reality truly is (The Matrix/ Hindu 'Maya'). For all we know, we could just be reality junkies, lost in the illusion that the tricks our minds are playing, actually mean what we are perceiving is genuine, when it isn't
Reply With Quote
  #33  
By Moontanman on 06-05-2008
Re: Why do UFO's spin?

I think the question "Why do UFOs spin" is a flawed question to begin with. I am not a true believer but I do think the UFO phenomenon needs to be investigated. Why is it a flawed question? Mainly I see no evidence in UFOs that they all spin or that even a majority spin. Even the ones that are described as disk or oval shaped seldom are described as spinning. I can think of a reason for disk shaped craft to spin but that doesn't mean they all spin or even most.

I do think the UFO phenomenon is so full of BS and people who are also filled with BS it's difficult to winnow out the wheat from the chaff. The is the main reason it's so difficult to take a fleeting sighting at face value.

Having said that there are indeed some sightings that flat out defy explanation, they have a huge amount of data from impeccable witnesses and are detected on radar, have pics, multiple witnesses in the air on the ground and some trained military observers.

While the fleeting lone person type sighting may really be true it's impossible to really make a call on such a sighting. Far to many skeptics concentrate on any sighting than can be explained away easily or resort to ridicule to destroy the credibility of the witness.

Far to many skeptics are so ignorant about celestial objects I rate them on the same level as the guys who see very light in the night sky as alien visitors.

I am almost completely sure something important has to be at the root of UFOs, it may indeed be alien visitors or something natural or even something about the human mind, but something is going on. We need to give it serious study to find out. Pointing fingers and making claims and accusations will not prove anything.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
By paigetheoracle on 06-11-2008
Cool Re: Why do UFO's spin?

One last interesting question:-

If not all UFO's spin, do all celestial bodies and if so why? I've noticed that if you kick something along the ground, it rolls or spins, unless there is reduced friction as on ice. Could it be that this is the material worlds way of dealing with resistance to ensure movement continues?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
By Moontanman on 06-12-2008
Re: Why do UFO's spin?

Real spinning flying saucer, really cool.

New Flying Saucer Runs on Plasma | LiveScience
Reply With Quote
  #36  
By Turtle on 06-13-2008
Arrow Re: Why do UFO's spin?

This is not an UFO, but it is a spinning flying saucer. Spin means stability, although the article does not mention the spin other than in the opening.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LiveScience
...Roy applied his experience doing U.S. Air Force-funded plasma research to develop the propulsion system devoid of typical aircraft parts such as propellers and engines. Here is how it works: Electrodes lining the vehicle’s surface ionize the surrounding air. This creates plasma on the vehicle’s exterior. An electrical current sent through this plasma generates a force that not only produces the necessary lift and momentum. It also stabilizes the vehicle in windy conditions. ...
New Flying Saucer Runs on Plasma | LiveScience

If this turns into a large scale workable aircraft, perhaps some UFO's utilize the same principles.

PS Just saw Moontan's previous post. I'll leave this as the quote is good.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
By DFINITLYDISTRUBD on 06-14-2008
Re: Why do UFO's spin?

Quote:
But the path from concept to production may not be smooth. Flying in Earth’s air requires a thrust at least 10 times greater than in outer space where drag and gravity are lower. And the plasma necessary to fly also obstructs wave transmission used for communicating with a remote source.
Quote:
Roy also envisions the craft in other atmospheres, such as that of Saturn’s moon Titan,
Quote:
Electrodes lining the vehicle’s surface ionize the surrounding air. This creates plasma on the vehicle’s exterior. An electrical current sent through this plasma generates a force
It would seem to me that it wouldn't work at all in space as air is a rather scarce comodity in space
Reply With Quote
  #38  
By paigetheoracle on 07-02-2008
Re: Why do UFO's spin?

This may sound a little silly but could flying saucers be shaped the way they are for the same reason foam is spun into discs by whirlpools? I saw a program on TV about the Bermuda triangle, where oceanographers said that mounds on the sea bed caused spirals above them, through the action of tides and currents (Think of a fire stick and the backwards and forwards movement of each hand, to generate spin on the stick itself). This made me wonder if the same thing occurred with mountains and air? Could the Egyptians have latched onto this and could this explain the design of the pyramids, for what purpose I can't even speculate at this time but maybe it has to do with kites and thermals? Maybe Flying Saucers use these thermals to glide to Earth too, manipulating local conditions? (Energy saving manoeuvre, even if it couldn't be used for take off).
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Question: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Question Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Question Question Starter Category Comments Last Post
New idea about UFO's! Moontanman Space 80 04-14-2008 05:10 AM
UFO's in space, apollo 11 Moontanman Space 27 03-04-2008 08:59 AM
Spin orbsycli Psychology 10 11-30-2007 05:46 AM
how to visualise the particles of spin 1/2,3/2----- gccbhu Physics and Mathematics 2 01-31-2005 06:54 PM
particles with spin 3/2 sanctus Physics and Mathematics 1 01-30-2005 10:45 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008