Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadam
Where did you get Bohr expansion velocity, or at least who else uses it?
Even if it is true, this would mean that atoms are getting bigger, and so the universe is getting bigger and we are getting bigger, and thus we cant measure the difference of the size of an atom.
|
JG: From 1981 to 1989 I studied the numerical relationships between the constants of the universe. I had a lot of free time at Sperry. In general my job was to design great systems and solve the problems others could not solve. I did not have the regular job like the regular Engineers. With 1500 Engineers, scientists, and mathematicians there were at least 50 like myself (BSEE summa cum laude) or alternate. Thus weeks at a time I could devote myself to my studies and discussions with my fellow workers.
Many people got paid even when they had no work. One Engineer who had no work for several years was told by his boss that he had to work overtime. This excited him and he asked the boss what great job he was going to do. The boss told him "Do what you are doing now but more of it".
It was funny, When I worked at Arma for a short time they had a whole group of people who were ordered to do nothing. If they were caught doing some company business they would be fired on the spot. The government would come along to inspect to insure they were absolutely doing no work.
Then one day they had a problem with the LEM. The whole team went from standby to working hard to solve the problem.
So I had plenty of time since 1981 to 1993 to discuss dot wave theory with some extremely brilliant minds all day long at times. Now it is true we do not belong to the physics club. Thus this is my hobby.
Anyway it is my belief that the Bohr orbit is correct. A lot of other people believe it as well. (The Sperry club). When we look at the dot-wave at present, the size of the dot wave is:
Rn = 1.31959E-15 (radius of the neutron as a perfect sphere)
Volume of neutron = (4/3) pi (Rn)^3
Volume of Dot = (4/3) pi (Rd)^3
#dots per neutron = 2.28198E41
Therefore the size of a dot according to physics solutions for atoms
Size of dot today
Rd = Rn / (#bipolar dots)^0.3333
Rd = 2.15941E-29
When we go to the big bang, the dot size shrinks. The ratio of the mass of the proton today to the proton right after big bang is
Ratio = 1.35465E8meters
Therefore the size of the dot at big bang is
Rd = 2.15941E-29 / 1.35465E8 = 1.59407E-37meters
This should be the same size of the dot within a black hole.
As the dots expand, space expands. The center of the galaxies have black holes and in general are a constant distance apart. The galaxies expand as the dots expand. Thus at big bang (over a billion simultaneous explosions around the universe- not a single point), the forming galaxies were 1.35E8 smaller. They have expanded but the photonic wavefront of the universe moved at the speed of light to a radius of 15.9 billion light years.
Thus the physical universe does not change size. We exist from 15.9 billion years to 31.8 billion years for the photonic field. at full expansion this field compresses and erases the present universe. In the future it will be an antimatter universe.
The Indian picture of the snake eating its tail is true for the universe. The present universe will be eaten by the future universe forever. It is foolish to believe the far galaxie are moving at the speed of light away from us. This is against Einstein. They would have infinite energy if that was true. Thus Hubble & Company interpreted the red shift incorrectly. Radar Engineers have no problem understanding that. The mathematicians can go astray because they do not need to have physically realizable solutions.
Engineers need practical solutions. Thus an Engineering solution to the universe must be practical and must work. Galaxies flying apart at the speed of light is not physically realizable. It really does not matter because it was Engineers who got us to the moon using Newtons equations.
I am sorry to hurt the feelings of many great physicists but a time comes when people must look at the universe from a practical physically realizable viewpoint. The Quantum Mechanical solution based upon the double slit experiment is false. The great professor Fenn.... (forgot his name for the moment) said no-one could explain the double slit without quantum mechanics was foolish. The physical nature of the physical universe does not require the strange solution he proposed. It is funny. Engineers laugh at his solution. And they laugh at an expanding universe at light speed.
The radar data in the secret library verified Einsteins basic equations quite well. So we know that originally his non-expanding universe makes sense. He was just led astray by the Hubble data which he accepted. Sad.........
The Hubble data is true but all it shows is that the photonic field from the galaxies is expanding and that the field centers at the center of each galaxy. We then read the red shift because the photonic field of the far galaxies has expanded and in doing so lost energy per unit distance.
Oh well to answer your question, we are getting bigger and bigger common mode. This is why gravity exists. The expansion of the Bohr orbit encounters the dot-waves of space which push back upon it. The electrical equation of gravity is one solution. The more complex solution is a general gas type solution in which the dot wave hit the atoms continuously producing Heisenberg uncertainty reactions which continually change electrical energy into mechanical energy.
However this solution is for physicists. When we change the coulomb and the AC coulomb-kilogram into spins of radians per seconds, this is beyond my ability as an EE to write equations or describe the universe. Once the physicists understand the true physical nature of the universe, then they can write better equations from a scientific viewpoint then myself. Thus in the end the great mathematical and physics mind of millions of people can produce the final equations. All I do is reach into the beyond to produce the engineering solution.
