Dot-Wave Unified field theory

[Roadam]

You still haven't answered my question about that velocity. How do you know atoms expand? Because if atoms were getting bigger even the meter would get bigger so we wouldn't notice it.

Dont throw in a big text of explanations. Tell how you got to it and from what. The basics.
But I guess you don't want to be proven wrong.

The purpose of engineers is making new things and making our dreams a reality. But unfortunately you cannot shape the inner workings of the universe.

So keep your dreams, I am going to bed.

[jerrygg38]

[quote=Theory5;242921]First off, please do not change what I say or put in my quotes.

JG response: I am not sure what you mean by that. I put JG for my responses. Should I put quote in front of your words?

Second no other companies were mentioned in the making of the aegis system, only lockheed martian.In my research I meant to say.

JG response: To the best of my knowledge Lockheed Martin bought out the military section of the Unisys company. Sperry Gyro at Lake Success NY was basically destroyed. I believe the Trident system went to Lockheed Martin in Uniondale N.Y. and the Gun system group went to Pennsylvania. I could call my ex-shop steward for the basic facts.

JG: That is what you believe. Why do you believe this??? In order to find truth you must deny everything. Then you must build up truth slowly. You make a statement that everything has mass.
I say that is wrong. Everything has energy. The dot by itself has no mass. It only has momentum and energy. It has charge but no mass.[/qoute]

Einstin said that mass = energy
Also he said that Mass and Energy are the same thing.
And if you want to go around disproving einstin then you better have the math to prove it.

Photonics isnt a type of energy as I said before it is the science of generating, controlling, and detecting photons


TV? TV doesnt have many correct science "facts".
You should purchase some newer text books and read up on those if you are using your outdate book from 1960. A lot has changed since then.

JG response: My work is breaking the code. The textbooks may be good for people with large memory ability. I have a calculating brain not a memory brain. The big trouble is data overload. There are so much information that the brain gets overloaded and cannot function. Why flood my brain with things I am not interested in. I read the elegant universe. Most of it is funny. The pictures are quite funny.

[jerrygg38]

Originally Posted by Roadam

You still haven't answered my question about that velocity. How do you know atoms expand? Because if atoms were getting bigger even the meter would get bigger so we wouldn't notice it.

JG: You are correct we are dealing with common mode expansion. That is why people cannot measure the expansion. that is why people do not understand the simple force of gravity.

Dont throw in a big text of explanations. Tell how you got to it and from what. The basics.
But I guess you don't want to be proven wrong.

JG: I am very happy to be proven wrong. The big problem is that I am my own worst judge. I was horrified in 2006 to realize that Doppler Space Time had a major flaw in it. I had three sister solutions. I chose the first one and worked on that for years. I replaced that with the second for Doppler Space Time. Then I realized that the third sister solution was the correct one. Two years have passed since 2006 and I have not found any fault with this last solution. I deny the truth of everything every day. It is tough. If you come up with an idea which will deny my latest solution, then I am out of luck because this is my last choice.

The purpose of engineers is making new things and making our dreams a reality. But unfortunately you cannot shape the inner workings of the universe.

So keep your dreams, I am going to bed.

JG: Have a good nights sleep. My brain does not sleep. It works all night long. When I awaken I study the new answers I conceived overnight.

[jerrygg38]

Hopefully I have answered all the questions so far. Let us now look at the universe from a wave perspective. We use the MRS system. this system has the units of meters, radian, and seconds. Thus everything in the universe can be described in terms of meters, radians per second, and seconds.

Coulombs are radians per second. Thus DC coulombs in this system are a simple angular rotation. The simple point charge is actually a spinning wave. It spins 360degrees in all planes. It spins slowly but billions of little dots produce a faster and faster net spin. Thus we see the summation of very slow spins which produce complex total spin patterns.

Kilograms are also radians per second. However we have to add a plus dot spin and a minus dot spin together to produce a more complex AC type spin. It is the more complex spin that has the property of mass.

The universe of radians per second for coulombs is a strange universe. We like to look at charge as a point. The whole basis of our understanding tends to be point charges and somewhat solid masses. The minute we move to wave theory we start to move away from our ordinary senses.

The solution coulombs equals radians per second comes from studying conversion charts and looking for the best solution. You have to pick the best fit and then study it. It took me from 1981 to 1989 to produce one solution. Then it took many more years to produce the Doppler Space Time solution. It takes a huge amount of time to study many possibilities and forever to study them all. It is only from 2006 to the present that I am studying the latest solution.

Anyone can produce charts of possible solutions. Computer people most likely can use computers to produce the best fit solutions. All I have is a TI-30X hand calculator. This is better than the slide rule I started with.

It takes me years to study a solution. Let us now look at the MRS solution.

The bipolar dot is spinning. This means that the dot itself enlarges in time. It means that at big bang, the dot itself is very small. Later the dot becomes larger.
Does the universe drive the dot or does the dot drive the universe. In string theory the string wind or unwind (as I understand it from Brian Greene)

The same thing is happening with the dots. when they spin faster they are smaller. When they spin slower they are larger. Thus we could consider that the dots oscillate from min to maximum on their own.

Many possibilities exist. We can also say that there is a driving function which controls the dots. Thus:

R(dot) = (1.85533E-33) e^-9.3611Cosine@ (11-37)

In equation 11-37 we have the dot radius varying as an exponential sinusoid being driven by the driving function @. this means that the entire universe could be synchronized by a higher driving function. This ensures that all galaxies explode simultaneously at over one billion black holes.

We could argue that the size of the dot is driven by the universe. However the alternate is that a higher level of the universe drives our light speed C universe. I do not know which is correct. Both are possible.

[Theory5]

Its Simple.
If you cant understand the basic equations that govern the laws of space and time then you cant make theorys about the laws that govern space and time.
I think I am done here.

[jerrygg38]

Originally Posted by Theory5

Its Simple.
If you cant understand the basic equations that govern the laws of space and time then you cant make theorys about the laws that govern space and time.
I think I am done here.

JG: The electrical solution I understand. The MRS system meters, radians, and seconds is not easy to understand but does present an additional avenue to study. The MRS system has only been studied by me the last 3 months. The MCS system meters coulombs seconds has been studied by me for over 20 years.

Anyway thanks for your comments although you appear too negative for me. I guess negativity is part of your nature. Your symbol is very negative. Try to balance your self with some positive thoughts. Life is not all down and out!

[CraigD]

In reading your posts, jerrygg38, A couple of questions come to mind:

• If the unit of charge in your theory is +/-7.062e-39 e, how does it explain the absence of any directly or indirectly measured elementary particle with charge other than 0, +/-1/3, +/- 2/3, and +/-1 e? (source: wikipedia article “list of particles”)

More important, however, is the following question:

• Does your theory make any testable predictions different than well-accepted theories, such as standard particle physics or classical mechanics and electrodynamics? If so, what is such a prediction?

When posting at hypography, members need to follow the site rules, the first of which is

In general, back up your claims by using links or references.

This means that when you make claims such as

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Einstein believed that mass and charge were sisters

you must back them up with links or reference to credible sources.

Also, you mustn’t make up terms without explaining them in conventional terms.

As a general rule, you should avoid criticizing well accepted theory by calling it “silly”. You should not attempting to support your claim by bragging that you have solved problems that engineers were unable to solve, leading them to “believe you used witchcraft”, or that you have “solve the rubic cube by merely spinning the sides without any thought whatsoever”. In addition to being incredible and unsupported (problems that you could rectify by posting links or references to credible literature describing your apparently supernatural abilities, or, say, a youtube video of you solving a Rubic’s cube), such arguments are examples of a logical fallacy, which, as is also stated in the rules, are to be avoided.

If you are consistently unable to follow the site rules, your posting privileged at hypography will be suspended.

[jerrygg38]

[quote=CraigD;243230]In reading your posts, jerrygg38, A couple of questions come to mind:

• If the unit of charge in your theory is +/-7.062e-39 e, how does it explain the absence of any directly or indirectly measured elementary particle with charge other than 0, +/-1/3, +/- 2/3, and +/-1 e? (source: wikipedia article “list of particles”)
  
  JG: Firstly my studies involve the smallest subparticle in the universe, the dot. This means it cannot be measured. The question of why you get 1/3, 2/3, and 0, and 1 is a question of large scale high energy physics rather than basic fundamental smallest particle physics. Things are different. Since this is New Theories I assumed that people would be interested in a theoretical theory. If they want proven theories then it should have been "existing modifications to proven theories." I study what cannot be seen or measured. As far as the 1/3 is concerned, that is a different area of study. My analysis of the proton specifies that it is made up mainly of three major ingredients. If you chop the proton apart you will chop the total charge into 3 parts. If the charge to mass ratio is constant, then you will get Q=1/3.
  Thus it seems quite likely that 1/3 is a good number for the charge. But that is not the basic interest in the dot theory.
  According to my calculations there are 1.416E38 positive dots in a proton. For 1/3 there are 0.472E38 dots for 1/3 charge.
  How can you measure these dots? Light is composed of plus and minus dots. Thus the dots show up in the photons. For every level of energy of a photon, the number of dots can be calculated.
  Dots also show up in the electrical field. The field itself is composed of space dots each one has q=1.13E-57Coulombs. The electromagnetic field is dots in motion.
  

More important, however, is the following question:

• Does your theory make any testable predictions different than well-accepted theories, such as standard particle physics or classical mechanics and electrodynamics? If so, what is such a prediction?
  
  JG: I just explain the theories by my dots. My theory does not replace the other theories. I just add into them.
  

When posting at hypography, members need to follow the site rules, the first of which is

JG: Ok. I will hit the color blue I answer. Are other colors okay?


In general, back up your claims by using links or references.

This means that when you make claims such as you must back them up with links or reference to credible sources.

I present a complete theory so I have no sources other than myself. It is my theory. Doppler Space Time is my book. When I use data from my physics books I refer to them.

Also, you mustn’t make up terms without explaining them in conventional terms.

Ok I will try my best.

As a general rule, you should avoid criticizing well accepted theory by calling it “silly”.

Okay. Sorry to hurt feelings. It is very upsetting to people to have their beliefs damaged. I will just say I disagree and state why.



You should not attempting to support your claim by bragging that you have solved problems that engineers were unable to solve, leading them to “believe you used witchcraft”, or that you have “solve the rubic cube by merely spinning the sides without any thought whatsoever”.

JG: Ok I will try to restrain my personality and humourous comments. It is true but what I think is funny others may be horrified at.

In addition to being incredible and unsupported (problems that you could rectify by posting links or references to credible literature describing your apparently supernatural abilities, or, say, a youtube video of you solving a Rubic’s cube), such arguments are examples of a logical fallacy, which, as is also stated in the rules, are to be avoided.

ok



If you are consistently unable to follow the site rules, your posting privileged at hypography will be suspended. [/QUOTE
COLOR="blue"][/color]
ok. We will see how it goes. Most groups that I have dealt with do not want to hear any new ideas. So they throw me out. I undestand that.

The only good thing is that I have a small group of readers who always want a copy of my latest work. Some colleges do put my books in their libraries and some students email me and thank me for my ideas. This is very small but I feel the right ideas into the right mind will achieve advancement for mankind.

[jerrygg38]

I have spent the last week rewritting my manuscript. I seem to be failing to bring my theory to light to others. I have reformated it to present the most important point first. Then as the book progresses I reinforce the points up front.
I will now post the new introduction in chapter 1. I would appreciate all comments both good and bad.

CHAPTER 1- THE DOT WAVE THEORY
SECTION 1-0 INTRODUCTION

In this chapter, the Dot-Wave Unified Field theory will be introduced. The theory is based upon the proposition that the entire universe is composed of a multiplicity of three basic things. The first is a positive dot-wave of charge 1.13144E-57 coulombs. The second is a negative dot-wave of charge 1.13144E-57 coulombs. The third ingredient for the structure of the universe is a bipolar dot-wave of mass 7.33982E-69kilograms. Every particle, sub-particle, and photon is composed of the dot-waves. Empty space itself is packed with dot-waves.

The Dot-Wave theory specifies that the universe operates upon a very simple principle that electrical energy transforms into mechanical energy and visa versa. Thus a positive dot-wave and a negative dot-wave combine to produce a bipolar dot wave. The positive and negative dot-waves have electrical energy and momentum. They do not possess the property of mass. Bi-polar dot waves have zero net DC charge. They have the property of mechanical energy and mass.

The Top equation of the universe is a transformation equation. Two opposite dot-wave charges combine to produce a bipolar dot-wave mass. Thus:

QD + (-QD) = MD (1-1)

In equation 1-1 we see that a positive dot-wave and a negative dot-wave transform to produce a massy dot-wave. Equation 1-1 is the Top Equation of the Universe. Although coulombs and kilograms appear as different properties, they are related by energy equations and are also related by the above transformation equation. Thus coulombs and kilograms are sister transformational units.

2.26288E-57 coulombs = 7.33982E-69kilograms (1-2)

1 coulomb = 3.24357E-12 kilograms (1-3)

Therefore:

1.60218E-19 coulombs = 5.19678E-31kilograms (1-5)

In equation 1-5, when a proton with charge +Q combines with a neutron with an electron with charge –Q to form a neutron, the gain of mass from electrical energy is:

Mass increase = 2 x 5.19678E-31 = 1.039356E-30kg (1-6)

Some of the mass increase of the neutron comes from the conversion of electrical charge to mass. Only a small amount of energy comes from the neutrino in the press. Thus the proton loses plus dot-waves while the electron loses minus dot-waves when the neutron is formed. The result is additional bipolar dot-waves are produced in the process.

We can also express the kilogram in terms of coulombs. Thus:

1 kilogram = 3.08302E11 coulombs (1-7)

In equation 1-7 we find that if we take one kilogram of material and completely convert it into photonic energy, we will obtain 3.08302E11 coulombs of dot charge in the form of plus dot-waves and minus dot-waves. The sun is continuously converting kilograms of matter into photonic energy. In the process many protons and electrons themselves are reduced to pure photonic energy. Thus the main engine of the sun is the destruction of the protons and electrons into photonic energy.

The bipolar dot-wave energy is:

EBIPOLAR DOT = MDC2 = 6.59668E-52 (1-8)

Each individual dot-wave has an equivalent electrical energy of half the bipolar dot-wave energy. Therefore:

ED = 3.29834E-52 (1-9)

The interaction between the dots within the particles and the dots of space produce the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle. They cause the Double slit experiment results. This will be explained in later chapters. The above calculations will be explained in this chapter and chapter 2.

Since mass and charge are transformations of each other, we can replace mechanical equations for gravity with sister electrical transform equations. This will enable us to calculate the time of the universe since big bang. It will enable us to calculate the radius of the photonic wave since big bang. This coincides with the outer radius of the universe.

The transformation equations for gravity enable us to understand the reasons for gravity. Thus we can produce an electrical sister equation for the gravitational constant. The mechanical gravitational equations are the result of interactions between the dot-waves of one mass, the dot-waves of a second mass and the interactions of the space dot waves. This produces very complex wave type equations which are beyond the scope of this book. The electrical equations are Thevenin type transformation equations. These equations provide a dual solution to the mechanical wave type solution.

As will be shown later coulombs and kilograms are transformations of each other and both can be replaced by a wave unit of radians per second. Thus the electrical world and the mechanical world can both be described in terms of wave motion.

I hope that this helps clarify what I am saying.

[jedaisoul]

Hi Jerry, I've enjoyed reading your ideas, but I have a few comments that I hope you will take in the manner they are intended:

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

The big problem is that in order for man to survive upon this earth he must replace obsolete energy sources with proton to photonic converters.

This is an unsupported claim. When the non-renewable energy sources are depleted, if we have not found some other source of economically viable energy, we will have to make-do with nuclear and renewable energy sources. There is no reason to assume that man will cease to survive upon the Earth, That is just an attention grabbing sound bite with no logic to support the claim. I'd expect that of the media, but not from someone who claims to have a serious interest in the subject.

What is true is that it will be unlikely that we will be able to afford tio be so profligate and thoughtless in our use of energy. The same applies to the other non-renewable resources. But these lessons have been learned, and ignored, many times before. For example, farmers who continually take more out of the soil than they put back, either have to move on or end up living in an arid desert.

So mankind will have to change his attitude to non-reneable resources of all kinds. That is very different from claiming that we will cease to exist.

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

The dot theory shows the dot structure of the proton from an Einsteinian energy viewpoint which shows that 3.482MEV added spherically to a proton will produce 938.272MEV of photonic energy. This is not added by linear accelerators but by spherical pulsating electromagnetic fields.

Have you had the opportunity to build such a machine on a test scale?

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Our spaceships can travel on a beam of light. The beam is dangerous when in operation but once it is shut off the photonic engine is non-radioactive. Thus any fuel such as water or iron can be used.
We can get to the moon in 3.5 hours. We will ride the light beam at constant acceleration of G. Halfway to the moon we will reverse to a deceleration of -g. Thus except for a reversal of one minute, we will never be weightless. The photonic fuel cell is a very gentle method of space travel.
In Doppler Space Time 2000 we can get to Mars or Venus in a little over 2 days. Pluto requires 25 days. We can also get to Alpha Centauri in reasonable time.

These claims seem unrealistic, but I admit I have not done the maths. How do you get from the Earth to the moon in 3.5 hours at only 1 G? Even if that is true, how much energy (in the form of light) will need to be expelled to drive a spaceship, say 1,000 kilograms, at 1 G? Won't that have an effect similar to setting off a nuclear bomb (in terms of the light output)?

Note: I believe that the photon drive is already being developed, to take unmanned probes to the outer reaches of the solar system (and beyond) using the energy from the sun to provide the propulsion. But the accelleration is extremely slow and the time taken is in decades.

I find the following comments condescending:

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Someday the scientists will realize that they most go to the basics. They will then discover the dots.
[snip]
The scientists went astray when they omitted the Einsteian energy increase from the Bohr model.

I thionk you also need to reconsider the following:

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

I have been banned by so many groups over the years.

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Unfortunately most people are preconditioned to believe the status quo. That is fine. This will not produce the photonic engine. Perhaps in another hundred years the powers that be will realize that the universe is a simple place. Then we can move forward. On the other hand global warming may destroy everything before then.

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Oh well. Most people give me three seconds. They they decide what I say does not agree with what they have been taught. I understand that. They cannot overcome their programming. Few people have the ability to do that.
They cannot think on their own. We are only programmed robots. We do not compute! A few of us think beyond our programming.

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Most groups that I have dealt with do not want to hear any new ideas. So they throw me out. I undestand that.

You might benefit from reconsidering the reasons why you have been banned so many times. Saying: "They cannot think on their own" and "Most groups that I have dealt with do not want to hear any new ideas. So they throw me out. I undestand that" just reveals how little you understand. I find that groups like this are interested in new ideas. Indeed that is a major reason why the groups exist. But there are rules. You get thrown out for repeatedly breaking the rules, not for expressing revolutionary ideas.

Lastly:

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

So there is hope for man. They have gone astray for the last fifty years. My work will go out and things will change. Many will deny me but eventually man will come to understand the truth of what I say.

This is simply messianic. It shows you in a very poor light. You need to consider not how closed minded people are, but how open minded they are to even listen to your ideas when they are interspersed with such egotistical nonsense.