 |
|
01-09-2009
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
i think this is a revarsal on the current line of thought on the subject
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
01-09-2009
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
based on this line of thinking
i hypothesize that if we could fill a chamber with hydrogen and strip all the electrons from them
then we have 3 choices of experimentation
either add nuetrons to a small amount of the stripped hydrogen
see if it destabalises and creates electrons that then create hydrogen again
keep drawing electrons out, see if more electrons are created
hence the more we draw electrons out the more electrons are created until the fuel source (hydrogen) is gone
or
condense the stripped hyrogen and wait to see if it produces electrons naturally(although we may be waiting a long time, but it may destabalise the process of the proton function to react faster, and we may be able to use this as a energy source)
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-09-2009 at 02:49 PM..
|
|
01-10-2009
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
Quote:
Originally Posted by belovelife
ok for my perception let me start over
lets start with a cloud of dark matter defined by matter that does not have any electrons connected to any proton
assumptions:
dark matter = nucleus = (ether --->m/am------>ether----->m/am.......etc)+or-(nuetron)
matter = nucleus + electron
ether = primordial form of energy
--------(constantly creating matter/antimatter pairs that are highly unstable
--------so they annialate and form m/am pairs constantly [possibly thousands of
--------times a second])
now for the billions of years the ether did its thing until its first decay
and what i mean by that its first change, similar to electricity changing to photons
but on a harder change level, more similar to natural decay of potassium
now when the first decay occured the proton was now shielded with electrons, and the ether reaction process was stabilized more
as the elctrons were at the same time attracted and repulsed by the continuing formation and annialation of the m/am pairs and the magnetics accociated with it
and since the energy was in ether form more often then m/am pairs
its effect is gravity, observed as a weak force since the energy within the proton is rarely m/am pairs in relation to the amount of time it is ether

|
ether-->m/am= impetali
derived from esperanto
impet- energy
ali- change
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-10-2009 at 12:07 PM..
|
|
01-10-2009
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
now for the billions of years the impetali did its thing until its first decay
and what i mean by that its first change, similar to electricity changing to photons
but on a harder change level, more similar to an electric stove changing electricity to heat
(easy to change to heat, harder to change back)
now when the first decay occured the other impetali was now shielded with electrons, and the impetali reaction process was stabilized more
as the elctrons were at the same time attracted and repulsed by the continuing formation and annialation of the m/am pairs and the magnetics accociated with it
and since the energy was in ether form more often then m/am pairs
its effect is gravity, observed as a weak force since the energy within the proton is rarely m/am pairs in relation to the amount of time it is ether
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-10-2009 at 12:13 PM..
|
|
01-11-2009
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
i have thought on this subject also
although you throw a new light on the subject
putting the 2 together i get a picture.
ok for sun spots, i have been pondering fusion of the sun
now say you take it like sediment layers
each layer being heavier as you get to the core
now with the heat and pressure together, this causes fusion
for a solar flare, this is like having one part of a rocket engine heating up more than another, causing a localized fusion to occur,
sun spot?
(the new matter formed creates a vacume effect because the fusion process was more eficient then you would think thus taking in heat energy to form the matter) ?
either way (i'm not sure if the vacume for that one in particular is possible because it would then imply that the heat is directly changed to matter)
(this acts like a lightning bolt in reverse pulling heat energy to equalized the affected area)
but for the sun1 -> to sun2
good idea
say in our suns growth, there was a line of growth drawn
at this line, a certain amount of super dense matter was created ( fusion of heavy elements),
then it pulled (gravity) the rest of the sun inward so fast
that the outside (or specific "sediment"layer) cooled enough to harden for a moment, like a shell
when the pressure and heat equalized, it exerted pressure on the the shell
causing a pulse (windows breaking)
although i still see our solar system as a 3 star system
2minor
1 major
and neptune is huge also
just a line of thought
thats where i am
Ideas?
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-11-2009 at 04:51 PM..
|
|
01-11-2009
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
let me rephrase that
more like a lightning bolt
less like a tornado
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
01-11-2009
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
now talking about this from my view of dark matter
our galaxy may be the effect of this
each star/solar system a "bubble" if you will
that was "burped" by this process going on
in the center of the galaxy, whereas our center
would not be a black hole in the traditional scence
more like one of those spinning firecrackers that
spin and shoot sparks every where
each spark a solar system
each star, this process happening,
where periodic similar pulses (sparks)
would eject matter into the solar system (solar flares)
in the same respect as the spark that form stars
if so
then our star would be powered by "dark matter"
a black hole would be dark matter
and the light from the sun would be the process itslelf
of the reaction in post #14
then a sun spot, would be the draw of electron fast enough
to create denser matter within the dark matter reaction crystal
edit:
sorry my idea did not come across clear
i meant the sun spot was the effect of
a small enough clump of impetali crystal
was at a periodic stable state (based on size and equal divisible state
[impetali crystal volume = 27 cubic units
impetali--->element x 27units]
then it would be the process of stripping nuetral state element of electron
causing the formation of molcules to stabalize the outer electron shells
of the effected area
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-12-2009 at 04:04 PM..
|
|
01-12-2009
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
Quote:
Originally Posted by belovelife
a black hole would be dark matter
and the light from the sun would be the process itslelf
of the reaction in post #14
|
now what if the impetali was itself a expantion
like this (as far as crystal densities inrelative terms goes)
ether -> impetali ->hydrogen
(not the best description but it will suit for this purose)
where in the core of a blackhole, the ether
is held still by the crystal, then as the crystal density lowers
it reacts but initiating impetali
(ether->m/am)
then as that reaction occurs, other change in energy form are allowed
like impetali->electron+photon+radiation
whereas a black hole would be stable and solid eccept on the outer edges
and photons traveling at it would have a different reaction
then a star may be a chunk of ether core
then a layer of impetali
then heavy metals (periodic table elements>100)
then metals (periodic talble elements<100)
all "popcorning" which is the process of fundimental energy form
to the current galaxy we observe
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
01-13-2009
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
01-17-2009
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Belovelife's unification Theory
This article forms galaxies from Dark Matter, and based on this hypothesis, a Blackhole is active Dark Matter.
The basis of this concept considers Dark Matter as a fundimental form of energy in the universe. Any and all elements in the universe are formed from its effects.
The Dark Matter would be a crystal of aether, at the core. Being heavily compacted, the Dark Matter would also have layers. At the core it would be Aether that, being compacted, is in a stable aether state. As you get to the second layer of a Dark Matter crystal,the aether intiates impetali. this would be because the density allows the movement of the aether.
As the Dark Matter Crystal gets less dense, it allows for change to even lighter forms of energy. this would include
(but not limited to):
electrons
radiation
photons
When the process of impetali attracts an electron (in the instance of hydrogen), the impetali process is stabalized. This makes the hydrogen atom its properties.
On the basis of this theory, Dark Matter would be continually emiting hydrogen until it reaches a highly reactive state.
We observe this as galaxy formation. At this time, it would ignite, causing matter to be thrown. Photons, electrons, radiation, etc. would go in all directions. Matter in many forms would also go in all directions.
Since a availible size of Dark Matter that began a reactive state, could concievably have a massive magnetic field, it would react by forming a disc with "arms" at the most reactive points of the Dark Matter crystal.
At the same time it would, during the reactive process, also emit chunks of Dark Matter possibly containing stable aether, but definately containing impetali. These would in turn react themselves and form stars.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
assumptions:
dark matter = ether + impetali
black hole = active Dark matter
matter = Impetali + electron
aether = primordial form of energy
A Dark Matter crystal core would be pure aether. The next shell would initiate impetali.
This would be what the collider recorded,in the case of the collider pictures (see ref.2),
The reason that there are more matter particles than antimatter particles would be the particle
was in direct line with the colliding particles at that moment.
For the billions of years the aether did impetali until its first decay.
That is its first change, similar to electricity changing to heat using iron.
Now when the first decay occured the proton was instantly shielded with electrons. The aether reaction process was stabilized as the electrons were at the same time attracted and repulsed by the continuing formation and annialation of the m/am pairs, and the magnetics associated with it.
Since the energy was in aether form more often then m/am pairs its effect is gravity,
observed as a weak force since the energy within the proton is rarely m/am pairs in relation to the amount of time it is aether.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our galaxy would be the effect of this reaction. Each star/solar system a spark from the original Black Hole.
Each spark a solar system each star,the change of dark matter to matter.
Periodic similar pulses (sparks) would eject matter into the solar system (solar flares), on a relative level to the size of the dark matter formation.
All the energy that the sun emits would be the impetali process combined with nuclear fission occuring.
Now a nuetron would be the aether that change to a magnetically nuetral state, which allowed stabilization of the aether in a solid state.
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-17-2009 at 05:38 AM..
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|