 |
|
03-22-2009
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
conceptual science
correct me if i'm wrong
now in my perception of the life of matter
in the view of life of a photon
the photon has to move through the prescence of matter
so in gasses its not the hard, because the density of the protons is not much
so there are less protons in a given area squared to influence the photon
now as a given batch of matter gets more and more dense
there are more availible protons to block the photon
then as you get heavier and heavier nucleus of the atom, it effects the proton in a diferent way
(so if there is a full spectrum photon, we only see its energy in one dimention but it may be leaking into other dimentions [or spectrums of the universe] via the transfer of energy of matter when specific intensity of the magnetism of the proton absorbes and transduces?)
either way, when the photon is travelling throught the universe
from point a to point b, the the intial electron shell jump that produces a photon,
starts its path, depending on the elements within the star, and at which point in the star is producing photons, we get a unique spectrum of light at different intesities of point spectrum, on the scale of the observable spectrum of a photon (since law of conservation of energy states that energy can only chance forms, not disappear)
this would be becasue the nucleus of the atom is transducing the photon in some way shape or form (i use the word transduce because it is changing one form of energy to another), now, while the surface of a star produces mabe full spectrum because at the surface the photons have less dense matter to travel through, so less of the full spectrum of the photon is absorbed and transuced (by the magnetic field of an atom) now closer (to the core of the star)the matter is also having electron shell jumps producing photons
now the heavier the elemement or molecule, metal alloy (in specific elemental forms or { heat values the add energy to electron shells that amplify the maagnetic fields of the atom to accelerate the patricles away in a bouncy magnetic field sort of way, and define wheather the magnetic field structure of the specific density of nuclei are in a solid pattern, liquid[still bouncy] or air not gravitationally held together }) , and in the process
of the life of a photon, some of the energy is instantly lost into the aplification of the magnetic field of the atoms the surround the instance of the electron shell jump.
so in this case the conservation of energy is, the potential expantion of energy of the magnetic field of the atom vs the level which an electron is produced which creates the atom in a magnetically unstable state which drops the extra electron, which is emmitted at the poles of the atom and changes back to a photon
where the energy of the photon is absorbed and trasduced by the magnetic field of the specific magnetic intensity of the atom that it is appraoching directly or just glansing the nucleus
the different magnetic properties of the nucleus of the atom along with the possible transducing properties of the nuetron, change how the photon moves, so one isotope may differ slightly than another depending on the amount of nuetrons invloved
so the effect of the nuetron is changing the photon in a specific way?
based on this line of thinking, the electron and the photon are +1 0 -1 of one direction of the universe
where as you approach 0 you can curve the magnetic properties to trave a different direction (i wish i could use blender on this site to embedd a moveable picture)
but like on a 3d graph where the straight line +1, -1 of energy back and forth through the universe in these directions, would be traveling on the x,y axis, going to another form would be like going to the z axis, so it would be 90deg from the polar +1-1, (electron to photon)
then you have 3 availible combinations
xy, xz, yz, which energy is in all of these patterns because of this
so in this case, the life of an electron can be changed to the life of matter, it would just travel a different poalrization of the fundimental energy (i call it aether from the old greek word)
x <-|->y axis = electron to light
x <-|->z axis = matter antimatter pairs (impetali)
y <-|->z axis = ? space-time ?
EDIT:
this is poetry
a poem
in scientific language
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 03-25-2009 at 05:40 AM..
|
|
03-22-2009
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
oh yea, mabe its as you approach 0,0,0 you are becoming more and more magnetism
so mabe the other axis is space itself
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
03-22-2009
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
anyway, if you take the planar value of [x,z][ y,z] of energy, then you get the change in matter by the intensity if the magnetism
so a more acurate model would be a circle with hydrogen in the center and the heavier metals being on the ouside in a straight line representing the spectrum of magnetic intensity based on how many protons are in the nucleus of the element , and also flucuations on a metered numbers of protons measured in the vector of nuetrons {database style} the amount of nuetrons would meter the spectrum in one direction of the existance of energy
so harmonic rings of this visual portrayal have similar qualities because of the magnetic field of that amount of protons in the nucleus, thus we get the noble gasses
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 03-22-2009 at 04:24 PM..
|
|
03-22-2009
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
Belovelife's unification Theory
this would be the [x,z] [y->z] axis
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 03-22-2009 at 04:22 PM..
|
|
03-22-2009
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
03-22-2009
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
then the [x<-|->y],[x<-|->z] plane would be perpendicular to the time flow
and the present would be each specific version of the universe at one point on the time acess
so at the beginning (or big bang) could be just the action of space traveling through space time
mabe a beginning, mabe no beginning no end, just change
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
03-22-2009
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
so on the x<-|->y axis
electron photon
at the instace of
-1
+1
+1 being photon
-1 being the electron
+1 would be the stopping of time, where the movement of space through time drags the electron
along
-1 would be time accelerated where the magnetism of the impetali reaction holds it in place ?
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 03-22-2009 at 11:11 PM..
|
|
03-23-2009
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
According to this, each specific element would emit a specific frequency when excited, and it would be opposite of the spectrum it absobes, and changes to magnetism. Where magnetism can be exchanged through atoms via their magnetic field. That we know as heat transfer. but when too much magnetic energy is appied in a given amount of time, elemental state (ie gas, liquid, or solid), The atom releases a photon in the opposite frequency that it absorbes.
So in the picture above, when the intensity of the photon is 0, then the deltaV of the energy has completed and it is in different form. Some bouncing to magnetism, some bouncing to an electron, some creating potential energy in the form of movement.
So different magnetic fields of atoms and molecules aims the energy in specific directions of the energy form direction.
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 03-23-2009 at 06:35 PM..
|
|
03-23-2009
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
say #8 was just a slice of the spectrum
where the electron would travel in both directions on the z axis, but the photon would have a band in the positive direction on the z axis based on wavelength structure of the photon
while this as all in the negative y axis (you would need to flip the pic in post #8 )
then in the positive y axis you would have
2 sin waves representing the flow of impetali
but it would be constantly at +1 on the plane, because all other points would be magnetism
each point on the graph representing the current point where the string is at (vs magnetism)
and the +1, -1 of both being the point where matter and anti matter are formed
where the plane of impetali would be at
+1 on the y
and fluctuate between 1 and -1 on the xz plane
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 03-23-2009 at 08:58 PM..
|
|
08-06-2009
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: conceptual science
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|