Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Alternative theories > Strange Claims Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2009   #11 (permalink)
maddog's Avatar
Creating


Location:
Akron, OH
 
maddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Cool Re: New Big Bang theory

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha elämuni View Post
Red shift (no doppler) proofs, photons expanding/exploding and emit/radiate energywaves and with this energywaves, photons pushing themselfs same way what phtons expanding/exploding!

Later, when phtons are old, they start pushing themselfs faster what they expanding/exploding and thats why old light it is redshifted!
Thats why you dont have a theory of everything!
Space dont expanding at all.
Looks like a variation on the Old "Tired Light" I remember from a class on Astronomy from college. Though now, I am finally understanding what you are saying in the other posts
(at least a little better).

I will have to look this up. What I remember this theory lost favor after satellite data didn't corroborate. Give me a day to get back to you.

maddog

... I'm back!

Here is a link from Wiki ...

Tired Light Theory

Last edited by maddog; 06-04-2009 at 10:42 AM.. Reason: Added Wiki Link found
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009   #12 (permalink)
buddha elämuni's Avatar
Thinking


 
buddha elämuni is infamous around these partsbuddha elämuni is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: New Big Bang theory

"If I understand you correctly, you are claiming that particles change size ?"

Yes!

Also nucleus of atoms change size!

Also your body change size!

Also earth change size!

Also Sun change size"

Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009   #13 (permalink)
buddha elämuni's Avatar
Thinking


 
buddha elämuni is infamous around these partsbuddha elämuni is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: New Big Bang theory

Heart *
According to this new idea, the heart expands rhythmically in beats, but it does not contract by itself. Instead, while the heart is not expanding, everything adjacent to the heart continues to expand at an evenly accelerating pace. The heart is thus affected by an external pressure which makes the still expanding blood inside the heart push its way out of the heart.

Blood flows in the veins due to pressure fluctuations. The blood flowing back to the heart does not have enough space to expand normally as it rubs against the valves. After this friction blood expands faster than usual, which results in a vortex closing the valve. And now the heart starts to expand again in a pulse.

Then how can it be explained that you can see it with your own eyes how a heart contracts during heart surgery?

This is in fact a three-dimensional illusion, which is based on the pulsating expansion of the heart and the evenly accelerating expansion of everything surrounding the heart.

Addition on April 10, 2007

The sinuatrial node emits an electric pulse, in other words, an energy wave whose separate energy bunches take with them energy waves released by the atomic nuclei in the heart (atoms included in the molecules that the cells consist of). Therefore, the energy waves cannot penetrate the surrounding atoms and get into their nuclei, and this is why the heart stops expanding for a while. Simultaneously, external pressure helps the heart to contract in relation to the other organs. After that, the heart expands in a pulse, as the energy waves make their way into the atomic nuclei in the adjacent cells, forcing the energy in them to be released in a pulsating manner.

Arrhythmia is caused when the energy pulse released from the sinuatrial node cannot make its way through a certain area, and so it cannot sweep the energy away from the space between cells, molecules and atomic nuclei in the walls.

When the organ is physically strained, for instance, the concerned area becomes positively charged, that is to say, there are denser energy waves moving between the nuclei of the atoms within that area. During exertion the sinuatrial node, too, pulsates denser energy waves containing a higher amount of energy, and so they are able to penetrate the area.

After the exertion the sinuatrial node settles faster, and the electric pulses released from the node cannot make their way through the charged area quickly enough.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009   #14 (permalink)
maddog's Avatar
Creating


Location:
Akron, OH
 
maddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Thumbs down Re: New Big Bang theory

Quote:
If I understand you correctly, you are claiming that particles change size ?" <-- [maddog]
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha elämuni View Post
Yes!
Also nucleus of atoms change size!
Also your body change size!
Also earth change size!
Also Sun change size"

Uh... No. These do not change size.

maddog
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009   #15 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: New Big Bang theory

If everything changed size, then, no change in size relative to things would occur... except for space between sizes.

Is this what you mean?

If you mean, relative to space getting larger, things get smaller?


----------------
When you go, you may take nothing with you except that which can be held in your heart. Fill it wisely.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009   #16 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
M.C. Grillmeister

Moderator
Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
ATL, GA, USA
Latest blog entry:
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: New Big Bang theory

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha elämuni View Post
Heart *
According to this new idea, the heart expands rhythmically in beats, but it does not contract by itself. Instead, while the heart is not expanding, everything adjacent to the heart continues to expand at an evenly accelerating pace. The heart is thus affected by an external pressure which makes the still expanding blood inside the heart push its way out of the heart.

Blood flows in the veins due to pressure fluctuations. The blood flowing back to the heart does not have enough space to expand normally as it rubs against the valves. After this friction blood expands faster than usual, which results in a vortex closing the valve. And now the heart starts to expand again in a pulse.

Then how can it be explained that you can see it with your own eyes how a heart contracts during heart surgery?

This is in fact a three-dimensional illusion, which is based on the pulsating expansion of the heart and the evenly accelerating expansion of everything surrounding the heart.
Besides having nothing to do with a new big bang theory, afaict, the above is flat out wrong. The heart muscles contract, they do not expand. The "expansion" is the relaxation between contractions.

heart

If you continue to post in such a way, you will continue to receive infractions. Make a claim, support it with legitimate references, and be coherent and on-topic. As I said before, please feel free to send me a PM if this doesn't make sense or you don't understand the rules. If I don't hear from you I will assume you understand the rules. If you still continue to post incoherent strange claims with no support, then you will continue to receive infractions which can limit your ability to make posts here.


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009   #17 (permalink)
buddha elämuni's Avatar
Thinking


 
buddha elämuni is infamous around these partsbuddha elämuni is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: New Big Bang theory

Quote:
Originally Posted by arkain101 View Post
If everything changed size, then, no change in size relative to things would occur... except for space between sizes.

Is this what you mean?

If you mean, relative to space getting larger, things get smaller?
I prophecy, big bang theory people going to make that knd of tehory later. New big bang thweory where space can expanding some area different faster. i donyt like theory who say, space expanding.

If space changes in any way, space post to be some place, where space can change some way.

Best, easy, and simple theory win. Only energy density changes in space who dont change at all.

i just wonder, what is this force, who keeping this energy inside nucleus of atoms same density?

How nucleus of atoms interactive with electrons, if nucleus of atoms stay in same density all a time?

how atoms interactive?

No way, i think, this energy who is inside nucleus of atoms, just expanding/exploding all a time.

Sun dont take a round, even it is looks like sun take a round.

Things who falling down, looks like they moving to direction who is middle of earth, but this things moving other direction, but not so fast what expanding earth skin moving.

Kopernikus was King and i am new King.

Now we have to wait new Galileo Galilei who proof that!

See you!

Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009   #18 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: New Big Bang theory

If black hole frozen in time when we look at it. How it expand or contract if it look frozen?

Same go for energy or light, it expand on its travel? Does it grow same speed as atoms?


It seem very hard to prove such idea.

(talking in his version of english, maybe better communication)


----------------
When you go, you may take nothing with you except that which can be held in your heart. Fill it wisely.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Origin of the Universe,,,,Bang or no Bang Harry Costas Astronomy and Cosmology 860 07-17-2009 07:32 AM
Big bang vs Einstiens theory of reletivity? Moadib Astronomy and Cosmology 4 02-22-2009 01:38 AM
Origin of the Universe: No Bang, Splash! (New theory) SlipString Astronomy and Cosmology 11 02-22-2007 04:07 AM
The Gravity Model vs Big Bang Theory W.Davidson Astronomy and Cosmology 43 06-25-2006 10:10 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:56 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network