| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Guest | Dark aether Apparently this is what the universe is filled with Now...I dont know a lot about dark aether, but from what ive read and been told it is matter with mass but no properties, it seems to pollute the universe entirely with its blankness I like to think of dark aether as a stem cell I have a theory (which requires a lot of INSANE stuff but bear with me) that dark aether is made by aliens think about it matter with no properties, no properties effectively means no energy in many scientific contexts, You cannot destroy matter/energy only transfer it what if dark aether is the result of a fuel which by ALL of the energy is transferred to the ships? I mean come on, whats more efficient than a fuel that burns all of the atoms ENTIRE energy for propulsion and only propulsion? and the end result is matter with no energy etc etc. It's a wild idea but i believe in aliens (i dont think theyve been to earth personally...not....for abductions etc anyway, maybe as a flyby visit LOL) To not believe in aliens is like saying only 1 garden on planet earth will have a colony of ants...I like that analogy...made it myself well i didnt hear it before so i made it myself, whether im the first to make it myself is up for a vote lol | |
| ||
| | #2 (permalink) | ||
| Visions of grandeur | Re: Dark aether Quote:
How can dark aether be compared with a stem cell? And which aliens, the ones in your nightmares? Give us all a break. ---------------- Tolstoy wrote; "men only learn when they're suffering". The question is; how much do you want to learn? | ||
| |||
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Guest | Re: Dark aether From what i know (which i stated in my before post isnt a lot) about dark aether is that it is matter with no property. a stem cell is a cell with no property No i have no evidence, then again many things have no evidence. Maybe the reason we keep finding so many weird things that cant be explained in space is because we're trying to explain them with the natures of the universe. Considering we're finding that difficult id say that's potential evidence to denote that not everything in the universe has been made by natural selection of the universe as it were. | |
| ||
| | #4 (permalink) | ||
| Visions of grandeur | Re: Dark aether Quote:
Stem cells certainly have properties, They have mass They are composed of protein They have DNA I could go on and on.................... I have a question for you, explain dark aether, this term is unfamiliar to me. ---------------- Tolstoy wrote; "men only learn when they're suffering". The question is; how much do you want to learn? | ||
| |||
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Guest | Re: Dark aether when i say property i mean an attribute towards the body Myocardial muscle is for the heart yet other muscles are not. I obviously know stem cells are MADE of something I have never insulted your intelligence so why insult mine and pick at things anyone would think obvious? Dark aether as i have read it, is aether that is "dark" as it were and that we couldnt explain the universes main mass/distances etc etc without this stuff, of which the universe is FULL of apparently (note the word apparently, meaning this is what i have read) and they can't quite figure out what it is as because its very mysterious Would you like me to elaborate? are you sure you wont attack me again and state the obvious like stem cells are made of matter? I best explain we use the electromagnetic spectrum to usually figure out (USUSALLY FIGURE OUT) a substances electron make-up basically due to electron configuration certain things react and give out different colours within the electromagnetic spectrum, everything in the universe does this apart from black holes obviously as they swallow light (as much as id LOVE to state how black holes work im afraid i only know the basics) but aether or sometimes known as dark aether does not act like this hence it not having a property like NORMAL matter but still has mass LIKE NORMAL matter. For someone who says they don't know much about this subject can sure fire out a lot of arguments against it eh? True i dont know lots about it yet can make a THEORY out of it, but you see....Theres the thing that unfortunately makes me less of a pig its a theory, im not blowing it around wanting everyone to believe it. All i ask is that if it is wrong someone can nicely and politely tell me why it is. In this process-i will learn more, no arguments will break out, someone has the satisfaction of knowing they taught someone something, and it doesnt clog the forums space up with entire rubbish. But no i get called a joke. Funnily enough the greatest scientists were all considered jokes Im not saying i am-far from it all im saying is you sure have a lot to fight against a subject which you say you know nothing of, which is ....stupid really.... I also like the way you only quote the bits that have no explination until later which are then explained, and the main explinations you dont challenge, I know your attitude ive seen it before, you remind me of someone VERY much so in particular call it a hunch but are you by any chance interested in politics, or have been taught politics? | |
| ||
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Hypographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Dark aether If your aether has no properties...then why do we even care what it is? It can't interact, it can't expand, it can't shrink, it can't even exist (another property). So...before you go on with violating our rules, please do as you have been asked and explain your theory. And stop making yourself look like a complete lunatic. At least stop punching Infamous for asking about your theory. Please read our site rules so that you avoid a ban. ---------------- Your Friendly Neighborhood AdministratorWant to sponsor Hypography? Buy a print in our Fall 2008 Benefit Sale Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. - Carl Sagan | |
| ||
| | #8 (permalink) | ||
| Creating | Re: Dark aether Quote:
Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004) http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml No aether http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/ http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7 No Lorentz violation There is no aether to 10^(-15) relative BY EXPERIMENT. Michelson-Morley experiments Brillet-Hall experiments Kennedy-Thorndike experiments Hughes-Drever experiments Ives-Stillwell experiments ---------------- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 | ||
| |||
| | #9 (permalink) | ||
| Hypographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Dark aether Quote:
---------------- Your Friendly Neighborhood AdministratorWant to sponsor Hypography? Buy a print in our Fall 2008 Benefit Sale Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. - Carl Sagan | ||
| |||
| | #10 (permalink) | ||
| Visions of grandeur | Re: Dark aether Quote:
---------------- Tolstoy wrote; "men only learn when they're suffering". The question is; how much do you want to learn? | ||
| |||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do we feel forces of Dark Matter? | randomname12345 | Astronomy and Cosmology | 36 | 02-08-2008 07:06 AM |
| First Dark Matter Galaxy Discovered | C1ay | Astronomy news | 3 | 08-11-2005 09:00 AM |
| Unveiling the high energy Milky Way reveals 'dark accelerators' | C1ay | Astronomy news | 0 | 03-25-2005 09:20 AM |
| Dark matter does not radiate | Aki | Astronomy and Cosmology | 12 | 02-15-2005 04:39 PM |
| Analogy to the Universe and Dark Energy | Moonchild | Astronomy and Cosmology | 4 | 12-07-2004 02:34 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 AM.









Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator




