Every scientist has to make a living. So isn't this going to corrupt the results of science when the scientist, who has to continue making a living, gets results that won't be to their employer's favour?
Whilst developing a new drug, if results come back saying the new drug is useless, aren't the developers risking the sack if their truthful, cause they really are saying 'we failed'? Bosses want results. If the scientists tell the bosses what they want to hear they'll continue to get paid. But they have to live with the problem and will most probably be found out later.
I guess this all says, if your going to be a scientist, you've got to be a successful one! How many unsuccessful scientists lie drinking in the rubbish bin?
Or in the real world does only 1 out of 100 scientists come up with good results, and have the bosses come to realize this and accept this?
Maybe it's easy to be creative and progress science along the path? Mabey being a scientist is easy............if done in little steps?!!!!!
Kizzi
