Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Alternative theories > Strange Claims Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-18-2006   #51 (permalink)
KickAssClown's Avatar
A Person


Location:
Here and now
 
KickAssClown is a name known to allKickAssClown is a name known to allKickAssClown is a name known to allKickAssClown is a name known to allKickAssClown is a name known to all
Send a message via MSN to KickAssClown Send a message via Yahoo to KickAssClown
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: New Relativity

What I ment was:
The gamma of it is calculated off of the body relative to the observing body. The m_0 was denoted, as the ground state of the mass. As per standards.


----------------
There are no truths in science, only the falsifiable hypotheses and explanations of the people who test them.

Hyper Physics
Hyper Math
Wikipedia
Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2006   #52 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: New Relativity

I decided to place this here to keep it a little cleaner around here.

Here below we have two images. Image 1 is the Einstienian version of dialtions occuring at near light speed travel.

The second image is the possible version of what occurs at near light speed travel. That I wanted to get some opinions on.



This is sketch of the typical relativistic diagram that displaces the observations between two reference frames with near light speed travel occuring.

The top section of squares is showing what the observer at rest see's. As the photon travels a much further distance, it will tick the clock at slower rate and display a much slower counting of the clock.

The bottom section is the path of the photon for the person inside the moving reference frame. The photon travels up and down inside the apparent rest , reference frame.

A simple representation, but I think it will do.



This second image is what I propose is possibly the correct display that would occur.

To describe what is happening here. The circle is the observer (at rest) of a fast moving near the speed of light reference frame.

Instead of a single photon we are using a stream, or otherwise a lazer beam. As the light shoots out of the source inside the fast moving reference frame it begins bouncing between the walls causing a tick on a clock each time it contacts a side.

The observer at rest sees the lazer beam traveling along. The moving frame is about 10 light seconds distance away as the experiment begins. As the light makes its way towards the observer to display both the lazer beam and the ticks on the clock. The source of the lazer beam continues on an equal in distance path. As far as the observer is concirned it has no idea what is directly happening on the ship. The observer however, views only that of which the light can display as it traverses towards him.

The red lazer describes the distance and posistion of the lazer according to the observer at rest. The blue part of the lazer is the hypothetical distance the lazer travels on the ship of the moving reference frame. The blue is the part of the lazer and 'data' which has not yet reached the observer at rest.

Eventually all the data of the experiment will reach the observer but at a later time in comparison to the reference frame in motion.

So What I predict is happening here is there should not be any time dialtion. The clock will send the same flow of time to the observer at rest, but instead of it slowing down, it will instead reach the observer at rest at a different time, in a sense, sending information from the past, however it is what makes up the very present of the observer at rest. The ship (moving reference frame) is in fact in a posistion further ahead than the rest observer is able to measure or detect.

What occurs at distance is irelavent to what presents itself as the observation made in the present of an observer.

You see we are Stuck inside that which hits us as information (light, data). Everything remains in the grand scheme (the same time) however, we can only measure that which is connected to us, or the observers atoms themselves.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Theory of Special Relativity for the Totally Confused Beginner Damo2600 Strange Claims Forum 30 08-04-2006 07:59 PM
A Flaw of General Relativity, a Fix, and Cosmological Implications Zanket Physics and Mathematics 17 01-30-2006 08:14 PM
Putting relativity to the test C1ay Science News 0 10-08-2005 08:56 AM
Special Relativity HydrogenBond Physics and Mathematics 2 09-06-2005 01:46 PM
Einstein's Special Relativity Fails? Mac Physics and Mathematics 264 05-20-2005 08:11 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network