I came across this..
http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/v...hro.skinq.html
I found it interesting, BUT!
I keep reading on and on about theories and studies. Yet these ideas and official like theories never seem to contimplate or explain the fact that there is anything anywhere to begin with. I mean simply any concept you can give me.
*taking a moment to explain my though process here*
....
Absolutly, positivly, no single notion of existance of any one thing can occur without an intellectual thought or presence to agree in reason that it has and/or is.
This means in simple terms, a thing as grand as a universe or an atom can not concieve itself out of nowhere or nothing, and so a concept of nothing could not exist and never has existed.
Now, "never has" is a branch part of infinite concept. Time is an irrelevent concept in an infinite structure, such as a circular path, no start no end. The conceivement of time is from dichomety type of reality where our intellectual thought and presence currently presides, in more or less this sector rather than this time frame.
So I plan to re-theorize the current concept of what a god is, or what most people consider a god. The current approach of creationism, creates alot of problems because of this concept we have of a god.
(It is difficult to expand our minds anywhere further than anything different we currently experience. For example, if you were able to float out of your body, the presence of yourself is what I am refering to, and take a re-look at the universe and the world. There is no up, down, left, right, center, outside, close, far, hot, cold, or any kind of dichotomy aspect (that seems to be stuck in our mind existing on a planet) but thats really how everything is when expanding to contimplate everything as one however large it may be)
So what I mean about -It is difficult to expand our minds anywhere further than anything different we currently experience- is its hard to look at a creator as something different than an bearded old man, or something that speaks like we do, or something that is not seperate or other than us.
I consider ourselves as much the same thing of what a god is, as god is itself or an atom is of a god. We are not a god, but we are fragments of whatever a god is as is everything that can be for nothing can be without it. This is not an idea based out of pure imagination. I didnt mean to get into this so deeply, but I can describe experiments and evidence that I are good evidence towards such theory as to WHY anything is what it is.
Spiritual Beings having a human experience not humans having spiritual experiences.
