Quote:
|
Originally Posted by InfiniteNow
Funny the passion I feel toward this. Never did I expect anyone to question the logic of my proposition.
When voting, a percentage is representative of the total number of voters being in the denominator. When one voter can make multiple selections, the pertage loses it's meaning because the calculation is no longer standardized. One voter might vote for one thing. However, if another voter chooses five, they are represented more and the percentage shown is skewed. This also allows the total to be greater than 100%, which is nonsensical.
The question that a poll's percentages are meant to answer is, "Out of those who voted, this percentage of voters chose this option over all others." When they have multiple choices, the percentages cease to mean anything.
|
Right IN, which is why no 1 category can exceed 100%!!
But with
multiple choice you vote can vote more than 1 category!
like with the latest multi-vote poll...
50% have cats
50% have dogs.
But there are also other pets.
50% have cats, and out of those, some have another animal...say a Tarantula. (11%)? and/or a dog.
I don't know why this is difficult for you to understand...
I must be missing something.
If you were the only one voting on a multi-vote poll...example:
What fruit(s) do you "like"?
Apple
Orange
Banana
say you voted Apple and Banana:
it means 100% (you) of the voters(so far) like Apples and Bananas
Apple...100%
Orange...0%
Banana...100%
shaking my head...
