| | #1 (permalink) | ||
| Dibbler ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | A guy in Chile built this robot & makes the claim it is capable of finding mineral, bodies, & what have you at depths of hundreds of feet. Quote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...22-robots.html ![]() ---------------- Who doesn't want to use words that will stun people into silence? ~ShaYou gonna eat that? | ||
| |||
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Resident USSRian | Re: Geo Radar Robot darn, so now i can't just burry the weapons, i gotta burry them to over a few hundred feet deep? that wont make my taking the world over again as simple of a task... ---------------- And remember that great question that Pierre-Simon Laplace and Sir Isaac Newton, Andrei Markov and David Hilbert, Richard Feynman and Enrico Fermi, Albert Einstein and Edmund Halley did not come to ask throughout all of their dedication and work: "Who the hell is IMing me?" This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. ![]() | |
| ||
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Creating | It’d be nice if Salinas would drop the “industry secret” line a little, and be a bit more direct in saying just what his machine is and is not. The brand “Geo-radar” implies that it’s some sort of ground-penetrating RADAR. The account of “Arturito” being used to find a body hidden under a few meters of concrete suggest this – GPR, a pretty mature technology, while it can only effectively penetrate about a meter of wet soil, can penetrate over a dozen meters of dry, porous materials like concrete – several times the depth of the body Arturito found. This is not to downplay its potential goodness – a robot that can systematically use a GPR all day with little human supervision is a great idea, and an big improvement on the manually-positioned ones I’ve seen used. Salinas also says his machine “searches for materials based on their atomic composition”, which sounds a lot like some sort of MRI, or maybe some kind of acoustic imaging. MRI is good for nowhere near the hundreds of meters Salinas claims, so acoustics seem more likely, perhaps something involving acoustic resonance. Acoustic techniques can penetrate thousands of kilometers, though they can’t, to my knowledge, directly detect specific elements. Perhaps it’s a hybrid system, combining several imaging approaches. Or perhaps it’s an elaborate, conspiring scam, intended to swindle investors out of mountains of cash. Time will likely tell. ![]() ---------------- Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies ![]() | |
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« -
|
iriver clix »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Waggle dance controversy resolved by radar records of bee flight paths | C1ay | General Science News | 1 | 05-14-2005 11:09 AM |
| Mars Express radar to be deployed | C1ay | Space News | 2 | 05-09-2005 09:09 AM |
| New X-Ray/Radar System? | Killean | Computer Science | 3 | 01-20-2005 05:11 AM |
| I, Robot | GAHD | Philosophy and Humanities | 12 | 07-20-2004 07:25 AM |
| Build Your Own Robot | Tormod | Computer Science | 4 | 06-21-2002 05:15 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:44 PM.









Who doesn't want to use words that will stun people into silence? ~Sha









