Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Science News > Technology News
Become a science forums sponsor today
Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools
HydrogenBond's Avatarhttp://hypography.com/forums/ relativity and chaos
HydrogenBond
Posted 05-05-2008
This idea came to me this weekend. I was trying to figure out how statistics fits into Einstein's claim that the laws of physics are the same in all reference. If we have time dilation within a moving reference, does that mean that the frequency of chaos will get less relative to a stationary...
  #20  
By CHADS on 06-11-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

A photon in warped space travels through distorted space to the observer .... ok .... the Photon wants to get to the observer in a straight line not through the warpage of space ~ that is why you see red/blue shift becuse the photon has to traverse but dosnt want to take the long way.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
By Overdog on 06-11-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHADS View Post
A photon in warped space travels through distorted space to the observer .... ok .... the Photon wants to get to the observer in a straight line not through the warpage of space ~ that is why you see red/blue shift becuse the photon has to traverse but dosnt want to take the long way.
Well, remember that light has properties of particles AND properties of waves. When we are talking about the redshift, we are talking about light as a wave which has a frequency and a wavelength. As the wave travels through space over thousands of years, the wavelength gets stretched longer because of the universe expanding. Does that make sense?

Image:Wavelength.svg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redshift - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote
  #22  
By CHADS on 06-12-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

Sorry people are leaving in disgust ... Obviously not a Proffessor.
Yes i understand .... thanks for not bailing out on me ....
The point im trying to make .. and im sorry for not making it clearer is that :

The Light wave You Describe That becomes Red/Blue Shifted over Thousands of Years because of expansion .. I can appreciate.

Now a Rock travaling through An exspanding space that reaches us ... is still a rock its not red/blue shifted. My point is that the Waves/Photon want to travel in a single direction not 3 dimensions ... just one or 2d flat space ...

The is why you see shifts .. becuase of the properties in light . A Rock cannot redshift .

I was Answering HydrogenBonds Questions:
1.How Do you get red shift at infinite dialation?
2.How does it create the Wonderful Things in the lab?

Hope this gives you a different Perspective HydrogenBond.

Please Tell me if my interperatation fails Anywhere and Please bare with me:

Draw a large Circle on paper this is the passage of time on earth .
Draw a smaller Circle inside this large circle and this is the passage of time at 99.9% Speed of light.
Now a Clock moving in the small circle at 99.9% of c for 3 years would return to the Larger Earth Circle and The comparson in Time Dialation would be 210years on earth clock for every 3 years on the clock at 99.9% speed of light!

This is the crucial Point!! Now actually at c You cant draw a smaller circle ... You must draw a dot in the centre of the small circle .. which is an abstract 1 dimensional point .

If you draw this out on paper and try to grasp what i have said you will see that Light Waves Want to travel in 1 dimension and if they never they couldnt red shift They would be like rocks in space.
Please anyone challenge me on this .. I dont like making people leave in disgust.

This should explain all the Wonderful things you see in the lab.
Last edited by CHADS; 06-12-2008 at 05:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
By Overdog on 06-12-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHADS View Post
The is why you see shifts .. becuase of the properties in light . A Rock cannot redshift .
Are you sure about that?

Quote:
Through the work of Albert Einstein, Louis de Broglie and many others, current scientific theory holds that all particles also have a wave nature.[1] This phenomenon has been verified not only for elementary particles, but also for compound particles like atoms and even molecules. In fact, according to traditional formulations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, wave–particle duality applies to all objects, even macroscopic ones; we can't detect wave properties of macroscopic objects due to their small wavelengths.[2]
Wave–particle duality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote
  #24  
By CHADS on 06-12-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

Please Educate me Overdog ,... thats why i am here ... Can you explain why the Interpretation is Wrong ?.. and thanks again for being civil.
Rocks do have wave propreties in thier constiuents but i hear the photon is massless.When a rock arrives at earth it dosnt seem stretched or shrunk It is the source and wants to traval towards its own centres toward c.
Last edited by CHADS; 06-12-2008 at 05:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
By Overdog on 06-12-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHADS View Post
Please Educate me Overdog ,... thats why i am here ... Can you explain why the Interpretation is Wrong ?.. and thanks again for being civil.
I appreciate that you are here to learn. That's why I'm here, too.

I think what the current theory is saying is that the rock does have both a particle and wave nature, just like the photons in light. It's just that with large objects like a rock, the wavlength is so short that we currently don't have the technology to actually measure it. But we have been able to measure it in smaller objects, such as atoms and molecules.

So, we are able to measure the redshift in light simply because it has a much lower frequency than the rock to begin with. But if we had the technology, we would see that the frequency of the rock is stretched out by the expansion of the universe as well.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
By Overdog on 06-12-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

Here's a couple more things you can check out...

Edwin Hubble - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Expanding Universe
Reply With Quote
  #27  
By Little Bang on 06-12-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

Time dilation is seen only to an observer outside the frame of reference. Example, if I have two clocks set to the same time and I take one into orbit then i can see that the one on the ground is running slower than mine. I'm outside the ground clock's frame of reference.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
By Jon13 on 06-12-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

um, it's in it's really basic stage, so i can't offer any evidence to support this, unfortunately, but my previous post was incorrectly stated. here's how it's supposed to be. since achieving the speed of light is impossible, the object, would have to be transfered to another plane of exsistence. briefly. once again, this is barely in my commitee's agenda.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
By CHADS on 06-16-2008
Re: relativity and chaos

Understandig cosmic expansion ... So there is a natural red shift tendancy?

Rocks cant travel at c.

My point was in understanding relativity and space time after revision remains the same :
Space is Essentailly 1 dimensional (c and the absence of all gravity) Are 1 dimensional and time makes it 2 dimensional ....... Without the Quality of 1 d space then you would not see Red shift.

Atoms making a rock make 3d space ..... Their constituents Want to travel at c (1d) always but cannot .... and it is this Direction toward the 1 dimensional that makes gravity.

Abeit the wave properties of particles differ the fundemental urge is toward the 1d is the same..... if you remove the time component from the wave you are left with a displacement component and distance travelled component that cant change.
C is 1 dimensional it dosnt move its a constant value that is Absolute.
The Tendancy is to believe that c moves quick but it dosnt move at all its just a reference.
Light moving through a heavier medium Is still c (1d) but its the mediums distortion in 3d that slows down the speed of the light but it dosnt slow down C.

What I argue with you is that if the particles/Waves never wanted to diverge on a 1d point(C) then redshift could not Occur and neither the wonderful things you see in the lab.

If it didnt want to move toward a 1d point then All could move at C through any medium and there would be no red shift just a constant timeless equilibruim or You could measure C in two similar mediums to be different values.

Even the expanding universe(cosmic Expansion) is expanding into a 1d point .
Last edited by CHADS; 06-16-2008 at 10:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
Nothingness and chaos HydrogenBond Physics and Mathematics 5 10-31-2007 04:32 PM
Chaos as mathematics Pyrotex Physics and Mathematics 11 05-26-2006 01:24 AM
The Chaos Theory Edge Physics and Mathematics 10 11-27-2005 04:49 AM
Chaos Theory Jonahtan Physics and Mathematics 9 12-13-2004 09:01 AM
Chaos theory question Kelddath Physics and Mathematics 5 12-08-2002 11:49 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:15 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008