|
Published by xersan 08-13-2008
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | ||||||||||
|
#1
By
xersan
on
08-13-2008
|
| Re: The COLLAPSE of SR (Special relativity) The collapse of SR [2] I want to give some secondary or preparatory information. 1- The theory of SR has consistency and it is defensible due to its postulates. 2- Every determination is produced and correct by its own references. Also, all references (and their sub/chaining references) have accordance with science or paradigm. But the roots of them are axioms or postulates. And postulates usually were not constituted by scientific procedure; they are recorded by satiated perceptions in local conditions. 3- Master-key is a postulate what has been rebuilt by scientific methods. It is very simple. And you may see complete picture of light kinematics. 4- After my information; you may think that `this is similar of Galileo event". In my opinion: It is second Galileo event. 5- The theory of SR will take part in science history as an idol for weakness of human's performance and mysticism. 6- In schools SR will use as an example for human's linear thinking instead of the nature's secret. 7- All publications about SR will be trash. And new publications will grow. 8- The space-time can be analyzed without deformation of units of dimensions due to rules of new concept. 9- I am very sorry by being the reason of a sensation. Please activate your attention and follow. |
 |
|
#2
By
Boerseun
on
08-13-2008
| |
| Re: The COLLAPSE of SR (Special relativity) Quote:
Big words, indeed. Just make sure your proposed theory cater for dimension contraction, time dilation and mass increase as the object under discussion approaches the speed of light - for those peculiarities are not merely hypothetical; they are proven and validated to a very, very small margin as predicted by SR. | |
| |
|
#3
By
xersan
on
08-14-2008
| |
| Re: The COLLAPSE of SR (Special relativity) Quote:
I said exactly that the space-time can be analyzed by classical methods due to new some definitions and re-activated scientific principles. I tell a different course. As you know everybody was just sure that the sun turns around the earth; because there was visual proof. It was as a postulate; had clarity, it was never discussed. Copernicus and Galileo had had a STRANGE theory*. But human learned the alternative mechanism (If the sun is chosen for reference system instead of the earth). And we were cloyed this format. Indeed I know some experiments of SR. But there was visual proof for the sun. The supportive experiments of a wrong theory are as caricature/humorous. For example muon (µ meson) experiment for time dilation. Its interpretation has a serious disinformation: The muon which produced in laboratory had been chosen as a reference system; and the velocity of reference muon had been supposed "ZERO". But it is never zero. The value of the speed of reference muon is similar value with natural muon's, certainly. The interpretation of the experiment is ad-hoc (They see what they want to see). Please investigate. thanks again for the chance of this information. | |
|
Last edited by xersan; 08-14-2008 at 03:39 AM.
|
|
#4
By
Boerseun
on
08-14-2008
|
| Re: The COLLAPSE of SR (Special relativity) There are plenty evidence towards Relativity, not even remotely as subtle as the muons you mentioned: 1) Look at a star behind the sun during a solar eclipse. The star moves. This points to the curvature of space. 2) Synchronize two atomic clocks. Load one up on a jet and fly it around the world. Keep the other one stationary. Bring them back together and measure the time difference. They differ exactly to the amount as predicted by SR. 3) In a particle accellerator, centripetal forces try to push the accellerated atoms into the outer wall of the particle accellerator. But not as much as you would expect, given the weight of the particle under discussion. The speed at which these particles are moving around and around, is trying to squeeze the particles into the wall with a much greater force than merely their weight - because of the velocity they're travelling at, relativistic features come into play and they actually increase in mass, increasing the outward push of the centripetal force beyond that expected from their mass. Thank God that scientists knew about that before they built the accellerators, else they would all blow their sides as the accellerated particles tear out the sides of the machine. So, if you propose an alternative to SR, we won't stop you. Please go ahead. But just keep in mind that you've got lots and lots of bases to cover, which SR currently plugs very neatly. |
| |
|
#5
By
xersan
on
08-15-2008
| |
| Re: The COLLAPSE of SR (Special relativity) Quote:
In my opinion the performance of human is not sufficient yet for space-time. SR is the first offer. First propositions have a chance credit naturally, because nobody knows anything. And a definition is better than nothing. The SR contradicts the experiment of synchronize two atomic clocks. The relativity has the rule of reciprocity. This rule requires the clocks will indicate the same time. Because, If the clock B has the value Vba of relative speed according to the clock A; It means that the clock A has also the value Vab (Vba = Vab) of relative speed according to the clock B. If we bring them back together, their measurements the time must be same. Unfortunately we suppose that the earth is stationary. But this is an illusion. We can isolate the clocks in space by thinking. We must pass over the locality. Besides, if we analyze the clocks A and B according to a third reference system, we will find different results. Anyway, the world will has two methods of solution for space-time. It may be better to use the both of them. And it can be tested the harmonious of natural reality. | |
| |
|
#6
By
xersan
on
08-17-2008
|
| Re: The COLLAPSE of SR (Special relativity) We are on the earth. Human suppose the earth and himself as an absolute reference system without consciousness. Indeed, it is naturally for everybody and nobody is offended. Locality is dominant. But we must see complete of the picture for the events about universe. For example the orbit of moon is circle, if the earth is reference system. If the sun is chosen as a reference, the orbit of the moon is like helical spring. Then if Milky Way is chosen, the orbit becomes as the form of helical spring with spiral axle…. And according to external system it becomes similar a rope or the twisted form of DNA. If we can look from out of universe, we see this form the orbit of the moon. The form of circle is wrong or not perfect. The circle form is result of locality. The proceeding of SR is similar the circle orbit of the moon. It claims universality, but it does not isolate the locality. |
|
Last edited by xersan; 08-17-2008 at 04:14 AM.
|
|
#8
By
xersan
on
08-17-2008
| |
| Re: The COLLAPSE of SR (Special relativity) Quote:
But SR takes the source of light as inertial reference frame for velocity of light. I will submit an alternative definition for inertial reference frame for velocity of light. I will interpriate prefering the source as reference of light. Please follow me. | |
| |
|
#9
By
modest
on
08-17-2008
| |
| Re: The COLLAPSE of SR (Special relativity) Quote:
~modest | |
| |
 |
| Bookmarks |
« Boston physicists celebrate first beam for Large Hadron Collider
|
The twins example of the special theory of relativity »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Article Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Article | Article Starter | Category | Comments | Last Post |
| Special Relativity | matrixscarface | Physics and Mathematics | 9 | 04-03-2006 01:09 AM |
| Special Relativity | nhobe84 | Physics and Mathematics | 0 | 09-09-2005 12:08 PM |
| Special Relativity | HydrogenBond | Physics and Mathematics | 2 | 09-06-2005 01:46 PM |
| Special Relativity | Aki | Physics and Mathematics | 0 | 12-31-2003 12:00 AM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 PM.
