|
Published by C1ay 03-07-2005
| ||
| ||
| | ||
|
#1
By
Dark Mind
on
03-08-2005
|
| Re: CERN Begins Installation On Largest Collider Great article. I have always found super conductivity as extremely fascinating but I've never really researched it before. I thought super conductivity could be achieved by slightly "warmer" temperatures. And do we know how close we are to this "near light-speed". Anyway, excellent for CERN, now when are they gonna build that SSC (Super-cunducting Super Collider)? |
|
#2
By
Fishteacher73
on
03-08-2005
|
| Re: CERN Begins Installation On Largest Collider A few years ago they were going to build the worlds largest collider outside of Dallas, TX. After a few millions in design and beginning building, the project got scrapped because of funding. We now have a really expensive hole... |
|
#6
By
pie
on
03-10-2005
|
| "super conductivity could be achieved by slightly "warmer" temperatures." - Yes, but how warm? the Universe could be wiped out at astroke. The Universe could warm up to ultra hot if if CERN scientists switch on the super atom collider, and accidentally create vicious particle, a 'killer stranglet' that gobbles up the earth. Our Universe is perched on terrible precipise. Benjamin allanach, a prominent scientist and research associate at CERN, the Geneva based particle laboratory of Europe Martin Rees stated: CERN, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research. - According to Rees, "physicists envisage crashing together an atom of gold and an atom of lead that could result in an unprecedented implosion. There are three possible outcomes, routinely discussed by physicists “with a straight face”. First, a black hole could form, into which we would all disappear. Second, quarks might assemble into an “object called a stranglet”, making the oceans solid. Third, a “phase transition” could occur that would rip the “fabric of space itself”, creating a vacuum that would expand like a bubble and destroy all the atoms in our galaxy." “This,” comments Rees with consummate understatement, “would be a cosmic calamity, not just a terrestrial one.” Some scientists might question Rees’s inclusion of eventualities that are “very, very unlikely”. But the greater the consequence, he reasons, the more we should seek to eliminate the risk. If an experiment has a one-in-50m chance of destroying the world, he argues, we are talking not only of the elimination of the six billion people that inhabit the planet, but the destruction of the countless populations that might follow us. |
|
#7
By
Dark Mind
on
03-17-2005
|
| Re: CERN Begins Installation On Largest Collider I never knew... Wow. That is some pretty interesting stuff there, but it was unclear to me whether or not it was all just theory or if that would actually happen from something like a gold atom and a lead atom colliding together in an atom accelerator. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« Artificial antenna helps 'cockroach robot' navigate
|
Building a better nanoworld, microbe by microbe »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Article Tools | |
| |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:38 PM.













