|
Published by C1ay 04-09-2005
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| | ||||||||||
|
#3
By
Dark Mind
on
05-17-2005
| ||
| Re: Timing nature's fastest optical shutter Quote:
Quote:
| ||
|
#5
By
Fishteacher73
on
05-19-2005
|
| Re: Timing nature's fastest optical shutter Perhaps it has to do with the crystaline structure of the solid. If it is a complex structure, a small change could propagate quickly and have a reasonable effect on the physical properties of the material. |
|
#6
By
Dark Mind
on
05-19-2005
|
| Re: Timing nature's fastest optical shutter Well that still doesn't answer the question, it more reiterates what is in the article. I was wondering whether or not the two quote I have above are supposed to be the same, like E=mc^2 and E=m(299,792,458 m/s)^2... I'm wondering if quote 1 is "c" and quote 2 is another way of writing it... |
|
#7
By
Fishteacher73
on
05-19-2005
|
| Re: Timing nature's fastest optical shutter Speed of sound in various mediums. 4560 m/s at 20 C is the velocity of sound in vanadium (not dioxide.. could not find that info.) Air at 20 °C 343.4 m/s Thats about 10 times the speed of sound in air or the rate one would expect phase changes. |












