| ||||||
![]() |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Article Tools |
|
Published by C1ay 12-09-2005
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| | ||||||||||
|
#1
By
Turtle
on
12-09-2005
|
| Can ya' here me now? |
|
#2
By
Bio-Hazard
on
12-10-2005
|
| Re: Texas A&M electrical engineer says simple scheme can stop electronic eavesdropper i figured this is what he was talking about. If i were still into digital communications i would probably care about this, but i've never had a cell phone. I suspect someone will figure a way to hack it once more. I do like their calculators though. I like the concept though because it resembles picking up a phone and listening into someone's convo but you hear the change in audio current. I'm sure someone will figure a way to alter it though. The negative feedback does take a whack at phreaks. |
|
#3
By
C1ay
on
03-08-2006
| |
| Update From my inbox, Quote:
| |
|
#4
By
cwes99_03
on
09-08-2006
| |
| Re: Update Two problems 1) Quote:
2) Any full time monitoring of the wire will result in a immediate knowledge before any conversation starts of what size resistor is plugged in on each end. The article above seems to be pointing to an evesdropper who tries to connect in after the other two were already connected. (Any good spy knows that with old analog this usually caused a short but noticeable click on the line due to a voltage spike when another receiver was picked up.) A sizeable resistor on the line used by the eavesdropper should minimize any change in current or voltage due to a new connection on the line. | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« Plasma assisted engines fuel efficient, cleaner
|
Deep-sea oil rigs inspire MIT designs for giant wind turbines »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Article Tools | |
| |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00 PM.












