Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip Small
Look forward to seeing folks build on this theme of using the smoke and the heat generated in some beneficial way. |
thanks Phillip.
I came away from the IAI conference feeling that commercial pyrolysis is still away off. No-one wants to be first. All the engineering problems have been done. Now the bean-counters are doing their sums. Using of course, economic models that have always been suspect and poorly predictive. (GW? Whats that? Just a runaway train that is about to mow you down, thats all)
There is a recent article in the Economist apparently that suggests we cut down
all the trees. I think the guy has been smoking too much "supply and demand"
I now know why I gave up studding economics - despite topping my school in it.
Anyway, I feel that we all need to be able to make our own charcoal.
Let the pyrolysis char makers worry about their markets when they finally consider them. We don't have time to wait.
So the problem becomes one of what do you do with dixonis and other poisonous bio-gasses in a home burn situation.
You obviously need to collect them or burn them.
Biogasses probably also contain a lot of oily resssiny material that is important to soil microbial life. So it would be nice to keep these.
Gary Larson has a STOVES list that might be helpful (same place as Terra preta list-bio energy lists).
I have been told by experts that it is possible to make your own char with not much more pollution than starting up an SUV.
There was a guy at the IAI Conference with a char maker about the size of a little fish-smoking box. I have to track him down. He was surrounded by people when I tried to talk to him.
I will certainly be looking at ways of making my own char this year.