[Moontanman]

Originally Posted by REASON

Maybe our solar system is really just an atom that is located along a fold of God's sphincter.

Somehow that wouldn't come as a real big surprise!

[Thunderbird]

Maybe we are points of conscious light of an ever evolving neural network, expanding outward into the cosmos,the ground of all being.

Are maybe where just assholes. Depends on your particular point of view.

[modest]

Originally Posted by Thunderbird

A red blood cell, after dropping of his load of oxygen is ask by a neuron in the brain . “You have traveled the world blood cell, is there a God ?” The blood cell replies. Every cell has its function in the ecosystem, this is clear, this is what I see. I pick up and deliver oxygen, why do you ask me, anyway, aren't you are the governors that control this world?
“I don't control or create anything, I just pass on signals, this is my function, I wish I could make sense of it all, sometimes I feel like we are all part of something larger, you know ?

Then a virus came along and killed them both horrifically?

-modest

[Thunderbird]

And they called it Satan.....

[Garry Denke]

You rang?

When the Lords Gods created Particle Physics...

Old story, New names

Rev. 4

1 god is 1 rock.

4 beasts are 4 charges.
father charge .333... e (spin)
son charge .666... e (spin)
ghost charge .999... e (spin)
spirit charge .000...1 e (spin)

24 elders are 24 fermions.
father charge .333... e quarks
(1st gen) down quark - down antiquark (spin 1/2)
(2nd gen) strange quark - strange antiquark (spin 1/2)
(3rd gen) bottom quark - bottom antiquark (spin 1/2)
son charge .666... e quarks
(1st gen) up quark - up antiquark (spin 1/2)
(2nd gen) charm quark - charm antiquark (spin 1/2)
(3rd gen) top quark - top antiquark (spin 1/2)
ghost charge .999... e leptons
(1st gen) electron - positron (spin 1/2)
(2nd gen) muon - positive muon (spin 1/2)
(3rd gen) tau - positive tau (spin 1/2)
spirit charge .000...1 e leptons
(1st gen) electron-neutrino - electron-antineutrino (spin 1/2)
(2nd gen) muon-neutrino - muon-antineutrino (spin 1/2)
(3rd gen) tau-neutrino - tau-antineutrino (spin 1/2)

Rev. 6-8

4 horses are 4 forces.
white charge .999... e higgs force
red charge .999... e strong force
black charge .999... e electro .000...1 e weak force
pale charge .999... e gravitation force

144,000 seals are 144,000 particles.

7 spirits are 7 bosons.
white charge .000...1 e higgs (spin 0/1)
red charge .000...1 e gluon (spin 1/1)
black charge .000...1 e photon, Z boson .999... e W,-W bosons (spin 1/1)
pale charge .000...1 e graviton (spin 2/1)

Rev. 21

1 great city is 1 standard model.
12 gates are 12 particles
12 foundations are 12 antiparticles

Rev. 22

1 rock is 1.

...Why did the Lords Gods create only 7 stars?

Seven stars (7 stars*)
1) dark temperature: [(hbar*c^5/G)^1/2]/k = 4.2903353(04) x 10^31 K
2) electric current: e/[(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2] = 9.8137286(29) x 10^24 A
3) dark matter: (hbar*c/G)^1/2 = 6.5907305(98) x 10^-9 kg
4) amount of substance: [(hbar*c/G)^1/2]/M = 1.6605387(82) x 10^-24 mol
5) dark length: (hbar*G/c^3)^1/2 = 4.8943724(18) x 10^-36 m
6) luminous intensity: [(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2]/alpha = 2.2372317(89) x 10^-42 cd
7) dark time: (hbar*G/c^5)^1/2 = 1.6325869(07) x 10^-44 s

I mean ...Why not 8?

G - D

[Mike C]

Originally Posted by InfiniteNow

How can you make such ludicrous comments and still take yourself seriously?

I consider my science to be realistic because it complies with the LoPh's, Experiments and observations.

On tne other hand, the BBT has no real science for its support?
Do you take the BBT seriously?

Mike C

[Mike C]

Originally Posted by C1ay

A suggestion Mike. I am generally against most litigation but I think you should consult with an attorney if you have any diplomas or degrees because you did not get you money's worth of education in this area. You should sue your previous academic institutions for both malpractice and dereliction of duty.

Ha ha.

I would then have to sue all the accredited authors of the large volume of books that I have.
They teach the basic physics I believe in and the other power science I disregard.

Mike C

[Mike C]

Originally Posted by REASON

Mike,

First of all, never underestimate the value of a Neutron.

Secondly, what do you think Protons are made of?

This is where I would stop probing any further.
This material is so dense that it just does not suggest any solution except one, There is NO space within its composition.

Mike C

[freeztar]

Originally Posted by Mike C

I consider my science to be realistic because it complies with the LoPh's, Experiments and observations.

It's too late Mike, you've already shown everyone here that your "science" is most certainly not realistic.

On tne other hand, the BBT has no real science for its support?
Do you take the BBT seriously?

This is not a thread on BBT.

[nutronjon]

Originally Posted by Thunderbird

Maybe we are points of conscious light of an ever evolving neural network, expanding outward into the cosmos,the ground of all being.

Are maybe where just assholes. Depends on your particular point of view.

Several people have held this point of view, that we are points of consciousness. I think this makes sense, considering reality is more than matter. I am not convinced subatomic particles are matter.

I wish I had time to read the whole thread. Nature as we know it is rocks, plants and minerals and I see no reason why God can not manifest in these ways. However, what goes with this is a sun, and that could also be a very important God function, connected with the center of the universe. I think we do consider this to be an expanding cosmos.

Especially Hindus hold that all is consciousness. The Monad, becomes divided like cells divide and we have the dyad, which leads to the triad, and so on, leaving us with atom particles that attract and repell each other and many forces that keep everything in motion.