Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Philosophy Forums > Theology forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-09-2008   #261 (permalink)
Overdog's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Virginia
 
Overdog is a splendid one to beholdOverdog is a splendid one to beholdOverdog is a splendid one to beholdOverdog is a splendid one to beholdOverdog is a splendid one to beholdOverdog is a splendid one to behold
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by ughaibu
I reckon there are three essential components in any god concept,
1) gods are assumed to control, but are distinct from, one or more natural phenomena
2) gods are assumed to have mainly autonomous volition
3) gods are assumed to be influenceable or controllable by humans.
I think the first three words of each of your components are sufficient to explain the concept.

"Gods are Assumed"
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008   #262 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
M.C. Grillmeister

Moderator
Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
ATL, GA, USA
Latest blog entry:
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by ughaibu View Post
I dont think this is true. If you accept my essential features of any relevant god:By number 3 god should be testable, using the question 'does prayer work?'. Fortunately we can save ourselves the trouble, as the experiment has been running for thousands of years, due to the persistence of millions of volunteers. The result seems to be quite clear, either god doesn't exist or, if it does, it's irrelevant.
I think we're on the same page. The problem with testing prayer is that it doesn't work like a causality experiment (this is what believers will tell you). So to a scientist, yes you can ask someone to pray for something and see if they recieve it or not. They recieve it, prayer works, they don't, it doesn't work. But to a believer, prayers being answered is at the whim of god. It can always be explained away.


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008   #263 (permalink)
Mike C's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Mertropolitin Detroit MI US
 
Mike C is infamous around these partsMike C is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman View Post
How about locusts, or red tides? The only reason you don't see animals destroying their environments is because you choose not to see. I can show you the light but you have to open your eyes.
There are a lot of such happenings in Nature.
The Creator GOD herself has created the carnivores, diseases, poison plants,
the food chain in the oceans and seas to prevent anyone specie from exploding in numbers and possibly other such controls.

Mike C
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008   #264 (permalink)
ughaibu's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C View Post
to prevent anyone specie from exploding in numbers
There's a rather obvious counter example to this.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008   #265 (permalink)
Mike C's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Mertropolitin Detroit MI US
 
Mike C is infamous around these partsMike C is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by ughaibu View Post
There's a rather obvious counter example to this.
You mean the 'people bombs' that the OT promotes with the Islamic religion as an example?

Mike C
Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008   #266 (permalink)
freeztar's Avatar
M.C. Grillmeister

Moderator
Editor
Basic Subscription
Sponsor

Location:
ATL, GA, USA
Latest blog entry:
 
freeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond reputefreeztar has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C View Post
You mean the 'people bombs' that the OT promotes with the Islamic religion as an example?

Mike C
Nope, try again.


----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan

"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008   #267 (permalink)
InfiniteNow's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
Austin, TX
 
InfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Some people have views of God that are so broad and flexible that it is inevitable that they will find God wherever they look for him. One hears it said that 'God is the ultimate' or 'God is our better nature' or 'God is the universe.' Of course, like any other word, the word 'God' can be given any meaning we like. If you want to say that 'God is energy,' then you can find God in a lump of coal.
~Steven Weinberg, Nobel-prize winning physicist in Dreams of a Final Theory
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008   #268 (permalink)
Southtown's Avatar
Bury, then water


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by ughaibu View Post
There's a rather obvious counter example to this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C View Post
You mean the 'people bombs' that the OT promotes with the Islamic religion as an example?
Mike C
Um, natural selection?


----------------
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008   #269 (permalink)
InfiniteNow's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
Austin, TX
 
InfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nature as GOD

Grab a beer and pop some corn. It's worth the watch.


Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defying Nature! Govind Websites 2 05-17-2007 01:33 PM
Contemplating about the nature of the God hallenrm Theology forum 20 02-08-2007 12:59 AM
Nature and Nurture HydrogenBond Biology 13 08-29-2006 02:47 PM
Nature boy 3 orbsycli Earth science 5 05-30-2006 12:45 PM
Nature does it better. Edge Biology 1 11-19-2005 01:46 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network