[Garry Denke]

and called their name Adam

0000 years - 4004 BC - Adam Adam
0130 years - 3874 BC - Eve Adam
0105 years - 3769 BC - Seth Adam
0090 years - 3679 BC - Enos Adam
0070 years - 3609 BC - Cainan Adam
0065 years - 3544 BC - Mahalaleel Adam
0162 years - 3382 BC - Jared Adam
0065 years - 3317 BC - Enoch Adam
0187 years - 3130 BC - Methuselah Adam
0182 years - 2948 BC - Lamech Adam
0600 years - 2348 BC - Noah Adam
----------
1656 years - 2348 BC - The Date ark Built at Stonehenge Shipyard

English Heritage timeline

Noah Adam built the ark at Stonehenge Shipyard in 2348 BC (see timeline). Salisbury Plain Coal Prospect ditches had been explored (excavated) and cursed. Digging for shallow coal had ceased after Cretaceous / Carboniferous limestone differences were learned at Stonehenge Mining College athletic field. LORD Fellow of Woodhenge cursed the land because his Prospect was barren of shallow coal. The Healing Stones (Bluestone) had failed and were returned to South Wales Coalfield.

4 'Station Stones'; Shipwright's 4 main hull braces
4 'Postholes at A'; Shipwright's 4 dock door piers
56 'Aubrey Holes'; Shipwright's 56 support beams

Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 01; Pitch angle (25 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 02; Pitch angle (30 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 03; Pitch angle (35 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 04; Pitch angle (40 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 05; Pitch angle (45 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 06; Pitch angle (50 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 07; Pitch angle (55 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 08; Pitch angle (60 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 09; Pitch angle (65 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 10; Pitch angle (70 deg) increase
Noah Adam SS 91 ark main hull brace (vertical)
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 11; Pitch angle (75 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 12; Pitch angle (80 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 13; Pitch angle (85 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 14; Pitch angle (90 deg) greatest
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 15; Pitch angle (85 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 16; Pitch angle (80 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 17; Pitch angle (75 deg) decrease
Noah Adam SS 92 ark main hull brace (vertical)
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 18; Pitch angle (70 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 19; Pitch angle (65 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 20; Pitch angle (60 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 21; Pitch angle (55 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 22; Pitch angle (50 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 23; Pitch angle (45 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 24; Pitch angle (40 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 25; Pitch angle (35 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 26; Pitch angle (30 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 27; Pitch angle (25 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 28; Pitch angle (20 deg) least
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 29; Pitch angle (25 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 30; Pitch angle (30 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 31; Pitch angle (35 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 32; Pitch angle (40 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 33; Pitch angle (45 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 34; Pitch angle (50 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 35; Pitch angle (55 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 36; Pitch angle (60 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 37; Pitch angle (65 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 38; Pitch angle (70 deg) increase
Noah Adam SS 93 ark main hull brace (vertical)
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 39; Pitch angle (75 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 40; Pitch angle (80 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 41; Pitch angle (85 deg) increase
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 42; Pitch angle (90 deg) greatest
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 43; Pitch angle (85 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 44; Pitch angle (80 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 45; Pitch angle (75 deg) decrease
Noah Adam SS 94 ark main hull brace (vertical)
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 46; Pitch angle (70 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 47; Pitch angle (65 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 48; Pitch angle (60 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 49; Pitch angle (55 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 50; Pitch angle (50 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 51; Pitch angle (45 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 52; Pitch angle (40 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 53; Pitch angle (35 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 54; Pitch angle (30 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 55; Pitch angle (25 deg) decrease
Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 56; Pitch angle (20 deg) least

Live Oak below Heel Stone

Woodhenge Dockyard salvaged Stonehenge Shipyard remains,
sometime after 2348 BC (see timeline) at the lower elevation.

Quercus virginiana

Garry Denke

[quantum dot]

I don't really get this

[freeztar]

Originally Posted by quantum dot

I don't really get this

Don't worry, nobody does...

[REASON]

What do you mean? Isn't it obvious?

[freeztar]

Everything about it is obvious except for this part:

Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 56; Pitch angle (20 deg) least

Everyone knows that it was: Pitch angle (19 deg) least

I don't get it, where'd he get 20 from?

[REASON]

Originally Posted by freeztar

Everything about it is obvious except for this part:


Everyone knows that it was: Pitch angle (19 deg) least

I don't get it, where'd he get 20 from?

Yes, but in circumstances when rounding is required I think the rule-of-thumb is, "it's better to round up" on pitch angles.

[freeztar]

Originally Posted by REASON

Yes, but in circumstances when rounding is required I think the rule-of-thumb is, "it's better to round up" on pitch angles.

Oh, ok. I get it now.

[Garry Denke]

Woodhenge Oil & Gas Prospect

The Ancient geologic structure map of Woodhenge constructed out of Quercus virginiana (Live Oak) wood from Noah Adam's ark built at Stonehenge illustrates the Lower (Early) Carboniferous (Mississippian Period) Limestone Reef existing below Woodhenge, the same prospective of oil and gas production. Without getting too technical here, simply compare the two (2) geologic structure maps following:

It's a gusher!
http://www.geomore.com/images/Struct...with_Fault.gif

Let's drill it!
http://www.megalithicsites.co.uk/images/Woodhenge.gif

(nobody cares about this area anyway,
just look at that carpark visitor centre)

So let's start drilling!

Regards,

Garry W. Denke
Geologist/Geophysicist
Denke Oil Company (DOC)
Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488
Plano, Texas 75086-6488
Tel: 972-422-8268
Fax: 972-422-7868
Cell: 972-768-4631
DOC: 570-788-5282

Garry Denke
Denoco Inc.

[Euclidean-Paradox]

Stonehenge was a not a shipyard. It is speculated to have been used a either a calendar (or astronomical observatory), or as some sort of religious site. Second, Stonehenge was built over hundreds of years.

[Euclidean-Paradox]

Originally Posted by Garry Denke

Regards,

Garry W. Denke
Geologist/Geophysicist
Denke Oil Company (DOC)
Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488
Plano, Texas 75086-6488
Tel: 972-422-8268
Fax: 972-422-7868
Cell: 972-768-4631
DOC: 570-788-5282

Garry Denke
Denoco Inc.

Gee, you actually think you validated your own competence by posting that information? First off, even if we take your claims at face value, your qualifications are not entirely useful for interpreting archaeological data.

And second, I took a look at your so-called company, and curiously there seems to be only three employees, and it sure doesn't look like an area where you would place an oil facility. I wonder why that is....