[MySiddhi]

Originally Posted by Reaper

So, he's not all powerful then? Does this mean that, gasp, he isn't really a God!

I gave you my answer that is based on my proof and the scientific definition of power. It does resolve the paradox but whether you can comprehend it is another question.

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by MySiddhi

I gave you my answer that is based on my proof and the scientific definition of power. It does resolve the paradox but whether you can comprehend it is another question.

I presume you are still referring to your misrepresentation of zero point energy?

[C1ay]

Originally Posted by MySiddhi

I see you are allowed to make illogical claims that I clearly have refuted yet I am still supposed to prove God within your illogical system. LOL

What a joke!

You started this thread with a claim to prove god and you've provided no proof at all. Instead you want to endlessly try to prevaricate by claiming somehow that I or anyone else must claim anything we've said first when they are simply diversions from your inability to back up your claim. There's nothing illogical about the system at all.

[MySiddhi]

Originally Posted by C1ay

You started this thread with a claim to prove god and you've provided no proof at all. Instead you want to endlessly try to prevaricate by claiming somehow that I or anyone else must claim anything we've said first when they are simply diversions from your inability to back up your claim. There's nothing illogical about the system at all.

The OP is the proof. And you have sought to disprove the foundations of my proof by claiming I cannot define and thus prove God.

But your argument was completely destroyed! Can you handle that?

[Reaper]

Originally Posted by MySiddhi

I gave you my answer that is based on my proof and the scientific definition of power. It does resolve the paradox but whether you can comprehend it is another question.

It's pretty amazing how far one can delude themselves. I could tell you that the physical principles used were not the correct ones, but why bother? You don't seem interested in learning anything new.

[Reaper]

Originally Posted by MySiddhi

The OP is the proof. And you have sought to disprove the foundations of my proof by claiming I cannot define and thus prove God.

But your argument was completely destroyed! Can you handle that?

Yeah right. From post one, all you have done was preach.

[C1ay]

Originally Posted by MySiddhi

The OP is the proof. And you have sought to disprove the foundations of my proof by claiming I cannot define and thus prove God.

But your argument was completely destroyed! Can you handle that?

Your OP proved nothing and you've had 86 posts to get one posted and failed.

Thread closed!