|
View Poll Results: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
|
|
no
|
  
|
8 |
47.06% |
|
no
|
  
|
9 |
52.94% |
 |
|
08-09-2005
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
¿42?
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rockytriton
maybe I should have made it "no" and "absolutely not".
|
or "absolutely not" and "positively not"....
----------------
Clay
Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
Add yourself to Hypography's Frappr.
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
|
|
|
08-09-2005
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Resident White Hat
Location: I am nowhere... Yet I am everywhere... All at once!
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by C1ay
or "absolutely not" and "positively not"....
|
I like that better  .
----------------
Dark Mind ...
Hypography Science Forums
Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
-Unknown
|
|
|
08-09-2005
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Resident Slayer
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
I voted "no" although a moment later I thought I should have voted "no". Its so hard to decide, I think it could be no or no, but I'm not sure.
Decidedly Undecided,
Buffy
----------------
"If you do not agree with anything I say, I'll not only retract it, but deny under oath that I ever said it!"
__________________________________________________ ______________-- Tom Lehrer
"No Robbie, not Europe!"
Forum Administrator
Hypography Science Forums - Science for Boys and Girls! Its not for nothing that we hang out here.
|
|
|
08-09-2005
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Existing
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Right now, the poll is tied, 5-5
It will be interesting to see whether or not people are more apt to choose the first, or the second. However, no - intelligent design is not scientific, and thus should not be taught in school, unless to point out the massive flaws.
----------------
Hypography Forum Administrator
|
|
|
08-09-2005
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Resident White Hat
Location: I am nowhere... Yet I am everywhere... All at once!
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Buffy
I voted "no" although a moment later I thought I should have voted "no". Its so hard to decide, I think it could be no or no, but I'm not sure.
Decidedly Undecided,
Buffy
|
Correction...
Decidedly null,
Buffy

----------------
Dark Mind ...
Hypography Science Forums
Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
-Unknown
|
|
|
08-10-2005
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Coincidence of Molecules
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Being that I like to waste as little movement as possible, I hit the first no I saw...
----------------
Don't walk behind me; I may not lead. Don't walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend.
Albert Camus
|
|
|
09-16-2005
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Thinking
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rockytriton
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
|
Since design detection is already taught in archeology, forensic science, cryptology, and copywright infringment, are't we already 4/5 of the way there? There's hope that biology will catch up in a decade or two.
----------------
"Would it not be strange if a universe without purpose accidentally created humans who are so obsessed with purpose?" Sir John Templeton
"Not guilty your honor, by reason of billions of years of evolutionary selection toward aggressive behavior" Unknown
|
|
|
09-16-2005
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Coincidence of Molecules
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lolic
Since design detection is already taught in archeology, forensic science, cryptology, and copywright infringment, are't we already 4/5 of the way there? There's hope that biology will catch up in a decade or two.
|
All of these examples a known creator is the thing to be compared against. "Design detection" is also more likely patern recognition..not a theologically based dogma. 
----------------
Don't walk behind me; I may not lead. Don't walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend.
Albert Camus
|
|
|
09-18-2005
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Thinking
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fishteacher73
All of these examples a known creator is the thing to be compared against. "Design detection" is also more likely patern recognition..not a theologically based dogma. 
|
The "known creator" is generally termed an intelligent agent. Design detection compares the output of Chance, Natural law, and an Intelligent Agent and determines in any given instance which of the three is the cause. (did that piece of rock get shaped that way by chance, or did an intelligent agent shape it?) (did that person slip and fall or were they pushed) (did that functionally integrated, irreducibly complex micro machine arise by chance or was an intelligent agent involved?) All look at the observable data and draw a conclusion. Agreed, this is not theologically based dogma.
I wouldn't however confuse pattern recognition with design detection. Natural forces can produce ice or salt, but these repetitive, non information/non message bearing patterns are not the result of intelligent design.
----------------
"Would it not be strange if a universe without purpose accidentally created humans who are so obsessed with purpose?" Sir John Templeton
"Not guilty your honor, by reason of billions of years of evolutionary selection toward aggressive behavior" Unknown
|
|
|
09-18-2005
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Hypographer
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Moved to the theology forum.
----------------
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator
Want to lose the advertisements? Become a Sponsor!
Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter
Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|