Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Humanities Forums > Theology forum
Become a science forums sponsor today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2006   #11 (permalink)
TheBigDog's Avatar
Doing the Impossible

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator
Gallery Curator

 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abstruce
For the sake of argument we will edorse the views of mainstream science.

** QUOTE **

I do not understand what you are asking here.
There are conflicting views within mainstream science, with smart men competing to prove what is true and what is false. Who will get picked as living in reality and who will be picked as living in fantasy when mainstream science doesn't agree? How much concensus will you need to qualify as being 'main stream science'?

Also, reality is what it is. Science can clarify our understanding, but it does not change what is and is not real.

Bill


----------------
aka TheBigDog - Hypography Full Freaking Moderator
Become a Hypography sponsor!
The truth is incontravertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end there it is. - Winston Churchill

TheBigDog's recommended reading: The Science of Success - Charles G. Koch

A neutron goes into a bar and asks the bartender, "How much for a beer?"
The bartender replies, "For you, no charge."
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #12 (permalink)
Abstruce's Avatar
Questioning


 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southtown
I think he's referring to the fact that "mainstream science" is perpetually disputed, correct BigDog?

According to your gospel, we should follow the majority of scientists' interpretation of evidence, regardless of whether they are correct or not.

Or is it that we shouldn't question their authority? LOL
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking if we are to believe that Science is perfect knowledge?

No you should not believe that Science is perfect, as it is not.

I encourage you to prove Science wrong.

If you can do this then you have just created Scientific fact.

We will then believe you until you are proven to be in error.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #13 (permalink)
Abstruce's Avatar
Questioning


 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

Quote:
Originally Posted by webenton
There are conflicting views within mainstream science, with smart men competing to prove what is true and what is false. Who will get picked as living in reality and who will be picked as living in fantasy when mainstream science doesn't agree? How much concensus will you need to qualify as being 'main stream science'?
Rember that the basis of Faith in Reality is, accepting the fact that we will not know all the answers to everyting.

Some things will never be known. Some things previously unknown will be discovered.

Not all facts are perfect. Perfection is not a reality it is only myth.

If ever Science doesn't agree with Reality, this I would like to see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by webenton
Also, reality is what it is. Science can clarify our understanding, but it does not change what is and is not real.
I agree.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #14 (permalink)
orbsycli's Avatar
bike


 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

if you are starting a religion
SO WILL I
mine will be better
and i will KILL all of your members.


----------------
"Rome falls nine times an hour"
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #15 (permalink)
C1ay's Avatar
¿42?

Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor

 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

I think it's better to just teach people to think for themselves and instruct them to question everything. No religion required.


----------------
Clay

Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
Add yourself to Hypography's Frappr.
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #16 (permalink)
orbsycli's Avatar
bike


 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

I agree with clay 100.73486%


----------------
"Rome falls nine times an hour"
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #17 (permalink)
Abstruce's Avatar
Questioning


 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

Quote:
Originally Posted by orbsycli
if you are starting a religion
SO WILL I
mine will be better
and i will KILL all of your members.
Isn't that already being done today with other Religions?

Good Luck!!!!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #18 (permalink)
Abstruce's Avatar
Questioning


 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

Quote:
Originally Posted by C1ay
I think it's better to just teach people to think for themselves and instruct them to question everything. No religion required.
I disagree Clay. There needs to be a social structure for normal people who do not here voices in there head.

Why should the insane people have all the fun?
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #19 (permalink)
Abstruce's Avatar
Questioning


 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

Quote:
Originally Posted by orbsycli
I agree with clay 100.73486%
Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006   #20 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Re: "NEW" Religion seeking members

Im with you but you have to understand we are not all on the same page. We are not all homo sapiens per say. We have humans not so evolved and their consciousness is much different than others. We can only respect others perceptions for you can only know what you know. However Im with you in the sense that we should begin in looking into new interpratatoins of things since our interpratations have changed.. and in fact we are.
However, we can and never will be able to get everyone to conform to one way.. this has no purpose, it is not anyones right or purpose.. and we can only truthfully be excited about our own paths and try to make sure it follows a pretty simple rule of being benificial to one and all.

Live and die, live and die... dont bother to cry, we all live and die..
We ask why, we ask why... you only get the answers that your mind can apply
Whats it all for, whats it all for? If your playing your tune, your an intrusment of its own symphony.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intelligent design pgrmdave Theology forum 640 07-18-2006 02:18 PM
Science Cannot Replace Religion Antti Theology forum 50 06-14-2006 12:22 PM
Evolution a religion? cwes99_03 Theology forum 74 12-27-2005 09:01 PM
An Examination of Religion Wizdumb Theology forum 83 10-22-2005 03:07 PM
Creating a Religion NoBigDeal Philosophy and Humanities 13 06-01-2004 12:33 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network