Go Back   Science Forums > General Science Forums > Philosophy Forums > Theology forum
Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old 06-21-2006   #11 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: time is human dymension

This I can agree on.

If we begin taking away parts of our existence, we are left with a model in our mind of a universe unmeasured. It will persue like a flash and an enternity, completely un-precidented. However it should follow the laws of physics in that process.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006   #12 (permalink)
cwes99_03's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
Central Illinois
 
cwes99_03 is a jewel in the roughcwes99_03 is a jewel in the roughcwes99_03 is a jewel in the rough
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: time is human dymension

Quote:
Originally Posted by amrit
time is a human dymension
there is no time in the universe
in the universe there is only motion
motion itself is a-temporal
universe itself is an a-temporal phenomena

time enters into existence when we start measuring it
in the unıverse there is no past no present and no future
they belong to the human mind only

yours amrit
So who's mind does time belong to? If time does not exist outside of the human mind, then why do things keep moving on when you are asleep, in a coma, dead? Why reincarnate? Time has no meaning then, so why reincarnate as anything other than what you already are? Why die?
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006   #13 (permalink)
Jehu's Avatar
Questioning


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: time is human dymension

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwes99_03
So who's mind does time belong to? If time does not exist outside of the human mind, then why do things keep moving on when you are asleep, in a coma, dead? Why reincarnate? Time has no meaning then, so why reincarnate as anything other than what you already are? Why die?
It is a common misconception that Buddhists hold time to exist in the human mind. The central doctrine of Buddhism teaches that the nature of reality is essentially cognizant (awake), and hence the title Buddha (awakened one). In the doctrine of emptiness, the Buddha taught that all things (i.e., ideas, objects, activities, etc., that may be perceived or thought about) were not real, but merely contingent. Everything then is like a shadow, arising and persisting as a result of external causes, and so having no innate properties of its own. He taught that there were five elements (space, water, earth, fire, and wind), however, these were not the elements of a substantial reality, but those of a cognizant one. These five elements correspond to the five fundamental concepts that are the foundation of modern physics (space, time, matter, energy, and motion/change). The three latter elements (matter, energy, and motion/change) he taught were mere illusions, while first two (space and time) he taught were neither real nor illusory. By this he meant that neither space nor time can be said to exist independently of the other. In truth, space and time are merely concepts that we use to describe the true elements of this cognizant reality, awareness and knowledge. This is why it is written that it is not what the eye can see that is the true reality, but that whereby the eye is able to see. This is also why the Buddha taught that the true nature of reality was not one, and not two. So you see, in the Buddhist doctrine, nothing exists in the mind of man, for man, like everything else is devoid of any self-abiding properties, including cognizance. Whatever cognizance we may appear to exhibit, is not our own, but merely a reflection of our true nature. Thus we are like the people in a dream, we see, hear, feel, think, and interact, but we have no substance – there is only the eternal dreamer.

Jehu
Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006   #14 (permalink)
cwes99_03's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
Central Illinois
 
cwes99_03 is a jewel in the roughcwes99_03 is a jewel in the roughcwes99_03 is a jewel in the rough
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: time is human dymension

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jehu
This is also why the Buddha taught that the true nature of reality was not one, and not two. So you see, in the Buddhist doctrine, nothing exists in the mind of man, for man, like everything else is devoid of any self-abiding properties, including cognizance. Whatever cognizance we may appear to exhibit, is not our own, but merely a reflection of our true nature. Thus we are like the people in a dream, we see, hear, feel, think, and interact, but we have no substance – there is only the eternal dreamer.
Jehu
Sorry, Jehu (hmm a Hebrew Biblical name) but all I got out of that was a bunch of double-speak. Guess I'm not aware, so I must also not be knowledgable.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006   #15 (permalink)
Jehu's Avatar
Questioning


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: time is human dymension

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwes99_03
Sorry, Jehu (hmm a Hebrew Biblical name) but all I got out of that was a bunch of double-speak. Guess I'm not aware, so I must also not be knowledgable.
Very well put Sir, couldn't have said it better myself.

P.S. Jehu is also a Welsh name, as well as being my name. (hmm)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://hypography.com/forums/theology-forum/5273-time-physics-time-buddhism.html
Posted By For Type Date
PhysOrgForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums -> TIME EXPLAINED v2.1 This thread Refback 12-20-2006 02:00 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Does Time Fly? Antti Astronomy and Cosmology 65 10-10-2009 11:27 PM
Creationism--Proof ? questor Theology forum 138 02-14-2006 03:06 PM
Time Dilation kamil Physics and Mathematics 60 08-15-2005 07:10 AM
Beyond the Singularity pihunter Astronomy and Cosmology 3 03-08-2005 10:44 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network