| | #31 (permalink) | |
| Holy cow! | Re: Genetic engineering wrong? I guess we've stopped evolving - for the time being. Any genetic change acquired by homo sapiens gets diluted very quickly, because of our large population numbers and physical mobility. There are no genetically isolated pockets of humans any more. We'd have to go through some catastrophic population bottleneck for any serious changes to become commonplace. What with oil running out, and the US and China about to slug it out for the few drops that are left, we might even see it in action. The same is true for sharks. They fit their niche so well, that their population figures have been pretty high for millions of years - with no major evolutionary changes for hundreds of millions of years. They predate the dinos, and outlived them. For humans to evolve, we need to kill 99.9% of 'em. Give it another ten or twenty years, or so... ---------------- Hypography Forums Moderator IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Bovinely blessed be thee. | |
| ||
| | #32 (permalink) | ||
| Creating | Re: Genetic engineering wrong? Quote:
![]() Guess that's what Osama's interested in... Don't Panic! ---------------- ronthepon, capitals avoided. ![]() And don't ask me why. | ||
| |||
| | #33 (permalink) | ||
| Explaining | Re: Genetic engineering wrong? Quote:
In any location where many children die before they have a chance to reproduce, evolution will still have a hand. Lands with large scale famine and no infrastructure to deal with it come to mind. Traits can evolve from this, and be distributed into the global genetic mix. I suppose your right though, the effect would be pretty small. Even the evolution of a favorable trait such as reduced requirement for water or food would not present a genetic advantage to the rest of the world population. ---------------- Thank goodness science is based on "survival of the fittest" rather than being a Democracy! Buffy Evolution is a hoot if you are one of the survivors. UncleAl | ||
| |||
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| Game Designer | Re: Genetic engineering wrong? I just want to get clear on something before I really comment on all this. Are we talking about: Eugenics Cloning Gene-Engineering Gene-therapy Transhuman Posthuman Or what? once this is answered to satisfaction I will cough up MHO about this. ---------------- "Anymore I am only interested in pets whom can make me coffee." -My Mom Hyper Physics Hyper Math Wikipedia Member of: IGDA YouTube MySpace Wikipedia:KickAssClown The Forge | |
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wrong!!!!! | Merek | Books, movies, games | 8 | 02-04-2006 08:45 PM |
| is it wrong | inside the sun | Philosophy and Humanities | 5 | 01-09-2006 04:34 PM |
| Engineering? Yes or no? | jschroet25 | Computer Science | 5 | 04-25-2005 08:14 AM |
| Mechanical Engineering | eyoussefi | Watercooler | 2 | 05-24-2002 09:51 AM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 PM.



















