Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Humanities Forums > Theology forum
Become a science forums sponsor today
View Poll Results: Is genetic engineering wrong?
Yes 3 15.79%
No 15 78.95%
it is wrong on humans only. 1 5.26%
it is wrong on Plants/animals only. 0 0%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2006   #31 (permalink)
Boerseun's Avatar
Holy cow!

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator

 



Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

I guess we've stopped evolving - for the time being.

Any genetic change acquired by homo sapiens gets diluted very quickly, because of our large population numbers and physical mobility. There are no genetically isolated pockets of humans any more. We'd have to go through some catastrophic population bottleneck for any serious changes to become commonplace. What with oil running out, and the US and China about to slug it out for the few drops that are left, we might even see it in action.

The same is true for sharks. They fit their niche so well, that their population figures have been pretty high for millions of years - with no major evolutionary changes for hundreds of millions of years. They predate the dinos, and outlived them.

For humans to evolve, we need to kill 99.9% of 'em. Give it another ten or twenty years, or so...


----------------
Hypography Forums Moderator

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII



Bovinely blessed be thee.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2006   #32 (permalink)
ronthepon's Avatar
Creating


 



Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boerseun
For humans to evolve, we need to kill 99.9% of 'em. Give it another ten or twenty years, or so...


Guess that's what Osama's interested in...

Don't Panic!


----------------
ronthepon, capitals avoided.
And don't ask me why.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2006   #33 (permalink)
Kayra's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boerseun
I guess we've stopped evolving - for the time being.

Any genetic change acquired by homo sapiens gets diluted very quickly, because of our large population numbers and physical mobility. There are no genetically isolated pockets of humans any more. We'd have to go through some catastrophic population bottleneck for any serious changes to become commonplace. What with oil running out, and the US and China about to slug it out for the few drops that are left, we might even see it in action. ..
Well, that is not entirely so.
In any location where many children die before they have a chance to reproduce, evolution will still have a hand. Lands with large scale famine and no infrastructure to deal with it come to mind.

Traits can evolve from this, and be distributed into the global genetic mix. I suppose your right though, the effect would be pretty small. Even the evolution of a favorable trait such as reduced requirement for water or food would not present a genetic advantage to the rest of the world population.


----------------
Thank goodness science is based on "survival of the fittest" rather than being a Democracy!
Buffy

Evolution is a hoot if you are one of the survivors.
UncleAl
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006   #34 (permalink)
Tarantism's Avatar
son et lumire


 



Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

thats it! im building a treehouse inthe amazon. i give it 10 or 20 years before they cut it all down and find me. by then maybe i will have been eaten by something.


----------------
-tarantism


Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006   #35 (permalink)
KickAssClown's Avatar
Game Designer


 



Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

I just want to get clear on something before I really comment on all this.

Are we talking about:
Eugenics
Cloning
Gene-Engineering
Gene-therapy
Transhuman
Posthuman

Or what? once this is answered to satisfaction I will cough up MHO about this.


----------------
"Anymore I am only interested in pets whom can make me coffee." -My Mom

Hyper Physics
Hyper Math
Wikipedia

Member of:
IGDA
YouTube
MySpace
Wikipedia:KickAssClown
The Forge
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wrong!!!!! Merek Books, movies, games 8 02-04-2006 08:45 PM
is it wrong inside the sun Philosophy and Humanities 5 01-09-2006 04:34 PM
Engineering? Yes or no? jschroet25 Computer Science 5 04-25-2005 08:14 AM
Mechanical Engineering eyoussefi Watercooler 2 05-24-2002 09:51 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network