Genetic engineering wrong?

View Poll Results: Is genetic engineering wrong?
Yes 3 15.79%
No 15 78.95%
it is wrong on humans only. 1 5.26%
it is wrong on Plants/animals only. 0 0%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2006
chamilton333's Avatar
Thinking

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Amerika
Posts: 21
chamilton333 is an unknown quantity at this point
Genetic engineering wrong?

why is genetic engineering considered for the most part unethical? i am catholic myself and catholics are against genetic engineering. i, myself, am all for it. genetic engineering humans is wrong, i think, but because god tells us we are the only animals with souls. is genetic engineering plants wrong? animals wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2006
Thinking

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in a house
Posts: 81
Vagabond -SC2- is on a distinguished road
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

I guess it would depend on your definition of genetic engineering. On one hand do you consider the use of gene therapy to cure a hereditary disease like hemophilia genetic engineering? As for on plants and animal we have been doing that for centuries if you consider selective breeding/growing and there are some modified crops being grown already.

Now on the other hand if you pick and chose the entire genetic make up of your unborn/conceived child --- well that could lead to the master race.
Have you ever seen the movie GATTCA?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2006
chamilton333's Avatar
Thinking

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Amerika
Posts: 21
chamilton333 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vagabond -SC2-
I guess it would depend on your definition of genetic engineering. On one hand do you consider the use of gene therapy to cure a hereditary disease like hemophilia genetic engineering? As for on plants and animal we have been doing that for centuries if you consider selective breeding/growing and there are some modified crops being grown already.

Now on the other hand if you pick and chose the entire genetic make up of your unborn/conceived child --- well that could lead to the master race.
Have you ever seen the movie GATTCA?
No, whats the plot?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2006
InfiniteNow's Avatar
Suspended

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,378
InfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

Here's what always gets me...

So according to the scriptures, God is this all powerful mofo. So, uhh... if this deity did not want genetic engineering (insert any other hot button issue too), then it wouldn't be possible anyway.

It's happening. Deal with it. Let's just try to make sure it's used responsibly.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2006
Tarantism's Avatar
son et lumire

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In Dark Trees
Posts: 2,044
Tarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to Tarantism
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

while genetic engeneering is a great advancement in human society, i think that we must resist the idea of playing god, no matter how good it sounds.
__________________
-tarantism


Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2006
Edella's Avatar
Questioning

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 312
Edella is a glorious beacon of lightEdella is a glorious beacon of lightEdella is a glorious beacon of lightEdella is a glorious beacon of lightEdella is a glorious beacon of lightEdella is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

Quote:
Originally Posted by (((tartanism)))
while genetic engeneering is a great advancement in human society, i think that we must resist the idea of playing god, no matter how good it sounds.
What constitutes playing God?As Vagabond -SC2- noted,for thousands of years farmers and herders have been selectively breeding their plants and animals to produce more useful hybrids.This is in essence Genetic engineering.When do you think it becomes playing God?Was Gregor Mendel playing God?
__________________
place clever observation here
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2006
Southtown's Avatar
Still Learning

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cascades
Posts: 1,507
Blog Entries: 1
Southtown is a name known to allSouthtown is a name known to allSouthtown is a name known to allSouthtown is a name known to allSouthtown is a name known to allSouthtown is a name known to allSouthtown is a name known to all
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

Genetic engineering is great, provided we know what we're doing. But we don't. We're just experimenting.

Otherwise, genetic engineering would be a powerful tool in controlling the adverse biological aspects of the rich.

I for one will almost enjoy seeing the above two aspects of GM culminate into a final outcome.

Wise is the Almighty. Hallelu YAH!
__________________
“Welcome to the desert of the real.” -- Morpheus

Last edited by Southtown; 04-21-2006 at 07:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2006
Tarantism's Avatar
son et lumire

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In Dark Trees
Posts: 2,044
Tarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to Tarantism
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

in my opinion it becomes playing god when you begin to use the same techniques as the farmers to selectivley breed humans.
__________________
-tarantism


Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2006
Zythryn's Avatar
Creating
Platinum Subscription
Sponsor
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

Quote:
Originally Posted by (((tartanism)))
in my opinion it becomes playing god when you begin to use the same techniques as the farmers to selectivley breed humans.
We already do and have for thousands of years.
Many (not all) mates are chosen because they have an advantage which others lack. The makes it more likely for those who have a certain trait to pass it along. Beauty is the main trait I am considering here. While the definition of beauty changes, many marry others based on this (especially younger couples).

Just as farmers select seed from the most robust or tasty crops, so do many humans choose partners the same way.

And, how about the idea of eliminating a hereditary disease (as mentioned earlier). Would that be 'playing god'. If so, is creating lenses so those with poor eyesight can see also 'playing god'?
How about the person that engineered the first wheelchair, are they playing god?

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2006
Boerseun's Avatar
Holy cow!
Hypography Staff Member
Moderator

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hartbeespoort, South Africa
Posts: 4,658
Blog Entries: 3
Boerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Genetic engineering wrong?

Every successful conception is an act of genetic engineering, seeing as the genetic make-up of the child will be different from both the mother and the father. Granted, the outcome is not determined by either of the parents.

Sex was an invention of nature to speed up evolution as organisms moved into new niches. Humans are one of the results of primitive organisms bonking for millions of years. Nature has now invented genetic engineering, using humans as its agent, to speed up evolution by several orders of magnitude. It is now possible for Nature, via Man, to genetically engineer organisms able to live on Mars, and other planets. We can technically build a lichen-like organism to inhabit Mars and create oxygen there. If we had to wait for Nature to come up with these kind of animals through normal sexual reproduction, we would've waited for millions of years still. Nature also invented rockets via Man to take these seed animals to new planets.

I think its great.

But being a New Technology, the ethical issues still need to be sorted out. It's almost like inventing a knife, and bitching about a knife being unethical, 'cause it can kill someone. Yet people hardly frown upon knives these days.
__________________
Hypography Forums Moderator

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII



Bovinely blessed be thee.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wrong!!!!! Merek Books, movies, games 8 02-04-2006
is it wrong inside the sun Philosophy and Humanities 5 01-09-2006
Engineering? Yes or no? jschroet25 Computer Science 5 04-25-2005
Mechanical Engineering eyoussefi Watercooler 2 05-24-2002

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 63.64%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 9.09%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 9.09%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 9.09%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 9.09%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network