Science and Religion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2006
Creating

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,445
ughaibu is a splendid one to beholdughaibu is a splendid one to beholdughaibu is a splendid one to beholdughaibu is a splendid one to beholdughaibu is a splendid one to beholdughaibu is a splendid one to beholdughaibu is a splendid one to beholdughaibu is a splendid one to behold
Re: Science and Religion

A date and time needs to be set for this.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2006
Turtle's Avatar
Pasquinader
Latest blog: manadag
Platinum Subscription
Sponsor
Arrow Re: Science and Religion

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadow
Dear Turtle,
You're on dude. An angel of death for you. Don't worry, he'll just vist. He's not taking you anywhere.
You can laugh now. I don't know about later.
shadow
Dearest Shadow,
I am a mirror, and shadows are not immune to my reflection any more than the light. I haven't been laughing; I have been crying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ughaibu
A date and time needs to be set for this.
Since this is smoky's experiment & I am always in the same place sceduling is of no consequence to me. I do appreciate the offer to act as my second.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boerseun
So - Turtle, be ready for the Angel of Death's 'visit'. Make sure you have all kinds of recorders, writing pads, cameras, etc.
I have these bits always at hand; you know me like a pamphlet Sir.
I propose that the proof needed is not for me, but rather for shadow. So shadow's further experiment is to question his ghosty when it returns on some particular feature of my environs. What sits on the upturned flowerpot in my yard?
__________________
Nemo me impune lacesset. ~Unattested
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006
Turtle's Avatar
Pasquinader
Latest blog: manadag
Platinum Subscription
Sponsor
Exclamation Re: Science and Religion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle
I have these bits always at hand; you know me like a pamphlet Sir.
I propose that the proof needed is not for me, but rather for shadow. So shadow's further experiment is to question his ghosty when it returns on some particular feature of my environs. What sits on the upturned flowerpot in my yard?
So much for that experiment, and on to some new ones that shed light on the 'shadow people', spirits, angels, and such ilk as people claim are visitations from supernatural beings.


Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmosmagazine
“Electrical stimulation repeatedly produced a feeling of the presence of another person in her extra-personal space,” said Olaf Blanke, co-author of the study conducted by a team of researchers from University Hospital in Geneva, Switzerland.
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/686
__________________
Nemo me impune lacesset. ~Unattested
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006
InfiniteNow's Avatar
Suspended

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,378
InfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Science and Religion

From the link above:
Quote:
When a region of her brain called the left temporoparietal junction was electrically stimulated, the woman described encounters with a ‘shadow person’ who mimicked her bodily movements.
Stimulation of subregions in the brain in close proximity have also been strongly associated with a feeling of well-being.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006
Turtle's Avatar
Pasquinader
Latest blog: manadag
Platinum Subscription
Sponsor
Talking Re: Science and Religion

Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteNow
Stimulation of subregions in the brain in close proximity have also been strongly associated with a feeling of well-being.
Close proximity to the left temporoparietal junction do you mean?
Not all the experiences of the subject seem to have engendered feelings of well-being.
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/686
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmomagazine
... During a language task, in which the seated patient held a card in her right hand, she described the person sitting next to her and trying to interfere with the task. "He wants to take the card … he doesn't want me to read," she said.
The Baba Yaga Hag stories/myths/experiences we discussed at length in the DMT & the Pineal thread have many of the hallmarks of the experiences described by this subject. ( posts #35 and on: http://hypography.com/forums/chemist...-pineal-4.html ) I add to that experiences of/with aliens, demons, angels, gods, spirits, blah blah yada yada.
__________________
Nemo me impune lacesset. ~Unattested

Last edited by Turtle; 09-28-2006 at 11:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
paigetheoracle's Avatar
Thinking

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 775
Blog Entries: 3
paigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to all
Re: Science and Religion

Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteNow
Explain to me scientifically how Jesus was born from a virgin in pre-genetic manipulation times?

How a boat was filled with two of every animal?

How... whatever. One is faith, the other is observation.
Playing Devils Advocate here - how about if the ark description isn't to be taken literally? Also how about if it was literal, God was an alien and the boat was a spaceship that held gene banks of the entire, present population? (Would also explain virgin birth or is this virgin on the ridiculous?).

As for the flood legends around the globe - sounds like record keeping of a known phenomena and one through global warming we might see again. How would future generations react to our version of events? (Liars? Misinterpreters of the truth?).

Personally, I believe if you aren't there (place/time), you can't know only speculate. It's like the story of the confederate general, who said 'They couldn't hit a barn door at this- "
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
paigetheoracle's Avatar
Thinking

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 775
Blog Entries: 3
paigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to allpaigetheoracle is a name known to all
Re: Science and Religion

I thought science was nuetral? As for the explanations - loads exist but the phenomena itself still exists (life/existence) and most of what people say is just hot air. The bible is full of speculation and facts, recorded by people much like us - some logical and scientific, others dreamers and charlatans. As a guide to morals, it has its merits. As a historical record, some use. As inspiration - whatever turns you on but don't be surprised if it turns others off or that they move on to other 'good books'.

As for death - we all flip this mortal coil and no argument or discussion means anything when compared to the actual experience of it for us as individuals (Others can tell you it's terrible/ wonderful/ boring) but only our own position to it at the time will decide how we react at the time (Rollercoaster Ride effect).

We are all either innocent blunderers, doing our best to understand and therefore control the world or deliberate trouble makers, out to destroy the world and everything in it - what would you rather believe? To me our attitude creates or destroys our links with the world and this is the science in Religion. It is an attempt to bring cohesion, where there is none as politics is its true counterpart, not science (divide and conquer). You could say it is the science of the soul and like a large percentage of anything, consists of cul-de-sacs and blunders.

It is the predecessor of psychology, sociology, history and other art subjects and is the best thing we had at the time to get us where we are today (Yesterdays Model T of the spirit). It is the holding onto what no longer works or has been found to be in error, that is the problem - not the original attempt to codify life itself. Everything starts off vague and generalised but experience hones our perception, so that we can sharpen our act and work down to the details of reality. As they say in Zen "The answer lies at your feet - walk on"

Last edited by paigetheoracle; 09-29-2006 at 02:39 AM. Reason: Needed to check something for suitability then get back
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
InfiniteNow's Avatar
Suspended

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,378
InfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Science and Religion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle
Close proximity to the left temporoparietal junction do you mean?
Exactly. I was mostly referring to an area called the entorhinal region, and how it's amazing that moving the electrical stimulus just a few mm in one direction or another can vastly change the sensation.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006
catholiboy's Avatar
Thinking

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London, apparently
Posts: 51
catholiboy is on a distinguished road
Re: Science and Religion

Just visiting this forum-
Wow, there sure are a lot of narrow minded scientist types among you, aren't there?
You would not be ill advised to look up some epsitemology...

Sorry, the entire point is that you cannot verify what you believe. At the same time, science cannot verify ANYTHING outside human experience...
See Kant, and the noumenal world...MAN IS THE LIMIT TO HIS OWN KNOWLEDGE.
Not, of course, that I endorse hardline doctrinal religion of any form.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006
cwes99_03's Avatar
Suspended

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,587
cwes99_03 is a jewel in the roughcwes99_03 is a jewel in the roughcwes99_03 is a jewel in the roughcwes99_03 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Science and Religion

Too Turtle's eternal chagrin, I will most likely follow up this post and begin discussing some of the earliest points of this now 30 post long thread. Some of the earliest points were wrong, or went unanswered, so I'd like a crack at correcting them.

I don't pretend to know everything about history, religion, or how certain things could have happened in the Bible. However, it has been my experience that some scientists are materialists, like our friend turtle, who insist for anything to be scientific we must have a material object to observe. However, much of science deals with phenomena that can't be explained at this time, but assumptions are made as to how it might be explained. Many of these very things occur in quantum mechanics and have been theorized and studied for 50 plus odd years.

Before I do so however, I would like all people who claim to be christians to weigh in on a few things. I'm off to lunch right now, but will bring them up when I return.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Science or Religion NORMANBOND007 Theology forum 37 06-24-2007
Science Cannot Replace Religion Antti Theology forum 50 06-14-2006
Will science ever overtake religion? hallenrm Community Polls 92 05-30-2006
Evolution: Religion or Science? Erasmus00 Biology 291 08-20-2005
New forum for science/religion debates Allen Biology 6 06-14-2005

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 63.64%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 9.09%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 9.09%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 9.09%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 9.09%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network