Antigravity Does Not Exist

[BSG CORP]

ANTIGRAVITY DOES NOT EXIST
Bert Schreiber

Abstract: Several experiments in the field of antigravity research by different individuals and or groups
showed that rotating masses (gyroscopes) apparently showed antigravity effects. The two results were:
Weight loss. Gyroscope(s) falling slower or measured gn changed. These results and conclusions were
false due to poor methodology and failure to understand exactly what the parameters of a gyroscope are.
Furthermore, antigravity (as a force/field) cannot exist, as there is no morphological (table) position for
them to exist at. Simply, an antigravity (Riemann Mirror Image of the gravity force/field) force/field
would self-destruct.

1. INTRODUCTION:
Over the past years various experiments by H. Hayasaka [1], V. G. Labeysh [2] and many other
of a similar nature, apparently showed the existence of an antigravity effect.
The work by Hayasaka only will be considered, as the end result is likewise applicable to all of
the other experiments. Within reason, Hayasaka eliminated, to the best of his ability, all of the
other possible causation’s such as the Coriolis’ force, change of gn with Earth’s surface tides,
temperature, etc.
However, to the best of the author’s knowledge, none of the experimenters considered the
absolute speed and direction of the Earth through space that changes (vectors) constantly.
However, it has no measurable effect and so is eliminated. Likewise, all of the experiments were
done in the Northern Hemisphere between restricted latitudes.

2. THE GYROSCOPE:
Unfortunately, the author must digress at this point. The majority of the readers of this paper will
probably not be familiar with the simple experiment shown in the old physics textbooks as such
have been removed from almost, if not all, current textbooks. A person holds a gyroscope (a
spinning bicycle wheel with the axle extended a few inches, in ones hands, arms extended at
right angles to their body while standing on a “lazy Susan”. When the person attempts to tilt the
wheel, their body rotates. In addition the wheel exerts a strong force against the tilt apparently
becoming “heavier”. Moving the axis laterally has no effect. Likewise, moving the whole axis up
or down vertically or even in a “horizontal” arc has no effect

3
The author is not aware of such experiments being done in the Southern Hemisphere as all of the
current experiments were done in the Northern Hemisphere and at latitudes above roughly 40
degrees.
Obviously, if ever done on the Moon, no effect as the rotational rate of the Moon is below
measurable effect.

4. NO ANTIGRAVITY FORCE EXISTS:
The author has offered a $2000.00 reward [3] starting over two years ago (EASY MONEY,
1998) to anyone who can show that there are more than three forces: Gravity, electric, and
magnetic. The morphological process did this. To date, not one single person has responded.
In addition, the author has a new a theory [4] that totally destroys all current physics theories. It
has been (was even in the past) that the Gravitational Constant is only a constant of
proportionality, consisting of two parts, and therefore just a number. The author has also shown
that any constant of proportionality can be eliminated in any equation it so appears in. The
Gravitational Constant is not required (and never should have been) in the first place to calculate
the force of gravity between masses. This is also in the reward along with the true equation for
gravitational attraction and the effect that requires only one mass to calculate it, i.e., a/the
singular gravitational force exists.

5. CONCLUSION:
A spinning mass does not create antigravity. The wrong conclusions were applied to poorly
performed experiments as all of the experimenters forgot the three primary simple facts on
gyroscopes to start with.
There is no place in the Laws of the Universe for antigravity, as it cannot exist.

[Tormod]

Originally Posted by BSG CORP

There is no place in the Laws of the Universe for antigravity, as it cannot exist.

I realize that your post is a cut-and-paste from elsewhere, especially since it refers to research which is not clarified nor linked to.

But this final statement above is by no means proven in the text. If this is your conclusion we need much more evidence to evaluate your theory (which is only mentioned in passing).

Moving this thread to physics.

[snoopy]

Im not that sure we can rule out anti-gravity just yet our understanding of gravity is not that good.

There is no 'graviton' particle yet that has formally been discovered and until that happens I have to reserve judgement.

I understand there has been experiments with super cooled superconductors that show weak anti-gravity effects.

If anti-gravity does exist its likely to be a very weak effect for theoretical reasons.

Cosmologists are growing in number that are postulating that there must be some anti-gravitational effects or at the very least there must be something that opposes gravity.

So for these reasons I would postpone judgement on this until there is more evidence on what gravity truly is.

Peace