1. A scientific spell checker.
2. A filter for Creationists.(eg latest neanderthal post).
3. Moderation is good but sometimes arguments are cut off a little too early; long before flame status. Perhaps just a gentle pull on the reins rather than closing an active thread may be more appropriate.
4. An easier way of posting pictures-something simple, intuitive and fool proof -you know Mac like.
5. More smilies. The new ones are good although the moving ones I find distracting.
6. More varied scientific articles and more of them.
7. The reputation thing is clever. Basically Skinnerian psychology. Hypography staff should seek out posts that approach "desired behaviour" and give more rep points. Others should be encouraged from the start to use the system. It took me an age to find out what the funny little green box was for.
8. A "
How to use hypography" ( and all its features)" tutorial for newcomers. Advice, for example on how to break up blocks of text to make it readable. How not to infringe copyright. This should be easily seachable as no one is going to read it at the start
9. Perhaps you should encourage old, retired has-beens like me to come and help younger members. I have been thinking of suggesting the site to an old, opinionated, retired math teacher friend. I also know others who would be interested. Perhaps you could reward the recruiting of new members or encourage it in some way?
Writing clearly about science, or your opinions, is not a universally abundant skill. Perhaps science teachers should encourge science students to hone their skills here?
Do you advertise or send press releases on what you offer to World Science Magazines?
The welcoming process is important but as a very new member sometimes I feel a bit silly doing it-
I have cross linked some threads to encourage others interested in the same topic to sign on (eg Terra preta)
10. Do anything you can to encourage a sense of community and loyalty to hypography. (No suggestions on
how to do this, sorry.)
11.I use
Google Alerts to keep me informed of new articles on selected topics I am interested in (eg
Terra preta; Obesity). Sometimes this works and more discussion and people come. Other times I feel as if I am "
a voice in the wilderness"(eg DDT) (Although the amount of hits on
Obesity and lack of posts must mean someone is
at least reading my posted links.) Do you want to encourage this sort of posting? If so, should moderaters be "feeding" threads with fuel from the latest journals etc?
12 A better search engine. The present one needs some fine tuning. I am often fustrated by it. I vaguely remember a post and have trouble finding it again. Try to find/search DDT for example.
Good luck
michael