Quote:
Originally Posted by DFINITLYDISTRUBD
|

The devil's in the details, ain't it.

To whit, if you could or care to, and other readers as well, please try and find out for your local area what percentage of pets requiring a license actually have it. As I earlier said anecdotally (wasn't able to find the story online) one of my local news stations reported that in Portland Oregon only 10% of dogs and 3% of cats are licensed contrary to the laws. Of course I presume that licensing your pet is part & parcel of "good" pet ownership (it certainly is indicative of bad citizenship to disobey the laws) so on this little schema then the vast majority of dog & cat owners in Portland are "bad" pet owners.
So it goes.
addendum: What's good for the goose is good for the gander they say, so I flew off & had a look in my area. I did not find anything yet for my specific county, but I did for other areas in the State:
Untitled
Quote:
Based on a formula used to estimate total pet population, Table 3 shows that 13% of the cats and dogs in Pierce County are licensed. The percentage is much lower than in Tacoma and King County (which, as mentioned earlier, serves 20 cities), but it is a little higher than in Snohomish and Kitsap counties. Thus, it could be argued that Pierce County’s estimated number of licensed pets is in line with the experience of comparable jurisdictions.Best PracticesPierce County and other jurisdictions have used a number of approaches to increase the number of pet licenses. These include employing people to canvass areas, increasing the number of locales where licenses can be purchased, and marketing through inserts, 1The AVMA pet calculator is at http://www.avma.org/reference/market...culator.aspThe [note: link is dead ]Pierce County Auditors Office uses the AVMA formula to aid in its work. ...
|